Healing Multiculturalism: Middle-Ground Liberal Forgiveness in a Diverse Public Realm.

Philosophia (Ramat-Gan, Israel) Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-10-11 DOI:10.1007/s11406-016-9758-z
Monica Mookherjee
{"title":"Healing Multiculturalism: Middle-Ground Liberal Forgiveness in a Diverse Public Realm.","authors":"Monica Mookherjee","doi":"10.1007/s11406-016-9758-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines debates about political forgiveness in liberal, pluralist societies. Although the concept of forgiveness is not usually taken up by liberals, I outline a plausible conception by exploring two recent approaches. The first, 'unattached articulation', concept requires no real emotional change on the forgiver's part, but rather a form of civic restraint. In contrast, the second version highlights a strong form of empathy for perpetrators. In spite of their advantages, each concept proves too extreme. The problems are revealed by focusing on the case of the Harkis, who fought for the French during the Algerian war. Often still marginalised in French society, their case helps to highlight the conceivability of a 'middle-ground' or moderate concept of political forgiveness. Its core rests on the forgiver's care for the social world. While this concept brings considerable challenges also, and is not inevitable in any particular case, it entails a more plausible combination of emotional and rational shifts in the forgiver's world-view. Although the article does not recommend forgiveness by any person or group, it observes, recalling Arendt's idea of <i>amor mundi</i> or 'love of the world', that political forgiveness may sustain a viable connection between diverse citizens' public and non-public lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":74436,"journal":{"name":"Philosophia (Ramat-Gan, Israel)","volume":"44 4","pages":"1057-1078"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11406-016-9758-z","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophia (Ramat-Gan, Israel)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-016-9758-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article examines debates about political forgiveness in liberal, pluralist societies. Although the concept of forgiveness is not usually taken up by liberals, I outline a plausible conception by exploring two recent approaches. The first, 'unattached articulation', concept requires no real emotional change on the forgiver's part, but rather a form of civic restraint. In contrast, the second version highlights a strong form of empathy for perpetrators. In spite of their advantages, each concept proves too extreme. The problems are revealed by focusing on the case of the Harkis, who fought for the French during the Algerian war. Often still marginalised in French society, their case helps to highlight the conceivability of a 'middle-ground' or moderate concept of political forgiveness. Its core rests on the forgiver's care for the social world. While this concept brings considerable challenges also, and is not inevitable in any particular case, it entails a more plausible combination of emotional and rational shifts in the forgiver's world-view. Although the article does not recommend forgiveness by any person or group, it observes, recalling Arendt's idea of amor mundi or 'love of the world', that political forgiveness may sustain a viable connection between diverse citizens' public and non-public lives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治愈多元文化主义:多元公共领域的中间立场自由宽恕。
本文考察了自由、多元社会中关于政治宽恕的争论。虽然宽恕的概念通常不被自由主义者采纳,但我通过探索最近的两种方法,概述了一个看似合理的概念。第一个是“独立表达”,这个概念不需要宽恕者真正的情感改变,而是一种公民的克制。相比之下,第二个版本强调了对肇事者的强烈同情。尽管它们各有优点,但事实证明,每一个概念都过于极端。以在阿尔及利亚战争中为法国人作战的哈基人为例,揭示了这些问题。他们在法国社会中仍然处于边缘地位,但他们的案例有助于强调“中间立场”或政治宽恕的温和概念的可行性。它的核心在于宽恕者对社会的关怀。虽然这个概念也带来了相当大的挑战,并且在任何特定情况下都不是不可避免的,但它需要宽恕者世界观中情感和理性转变的更合理的组合。尽管这篇文章并不推荐任何人或团体的宽恕,但它回顾了阿伦特的“世界之爱”(amor mundi)的观点,认为政治宽恕可以维持不同公民的公共和非公共生活之间的可行联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How AI Systems Can Be Blameworthy. W. Matthews Grant's Dual Sources Account and Ultimate Responsibility. Taxation in the COVID-19 Pandemic: to Pay or Not to Pay. The Value of Knowledge and Other Epistemic Standings: A Case for Epistemic Pluralism. The Conditional Analysis of the Agentive Modals: a Reply to Mandelkern et al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1