{"title":"LA DOTTRINA DELLA DIGESTIONE SECONDO DESCARTES. ITINERARI TRA TESTI, INTERTESTI E CONTESTI.","authors":"Franco A Meschini","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the 17th century, between the second half of the 1630s and the years of the 1640s, the town of Leyden became an important center for the experimentation, discussion, and dissemination related to the discovery of blood circulation and the emerging doctrine of digestion. People such as Jean de Walaeus, Franz de le Boë (Sylvius), and Thomas Bartholinus worked there. No less passionate, in this circle, was the activity of the two printers Jean Maire and Franciscus Hackius. In this context, between 1640 and 1643, also René Descartes sojourned in Leyden, living first in the city and then in the castle of Engeest. Two of Descartes' letters to Henricus Regius, and one to Marin Mersenne, date back tothis period. In each letter, the philosopher, solicited by his intelocutors, responds to issues regarding digestion and tied to the discovery of the venae lacteae (lacteal vessels) on thepart of Gaspare Aselli. Referring with all probability to these letters (and to La description du corps humain). Louis De La Forge, in his commentary on L'Home (1664), is the first to mention the assent of Descartes to the discovery of Aselli and the next one of Jean Pecquet (receptaculum chyli). Prompted by La Forge's commentary, the article examines the three letters mentioned above. Proceeding with the examination of Lespassions de l'âme (a work about whose writing it formulates its own hypothesis) and of La description du corps humain, it reaches the conclusion that in Descartes the doctrine of digestion, while playing an important role in his physiology, nevertheless remains on the margin of the discoveries and of the contemporary debate.</p>","PeriodicalId":82321,"journal":{"name":"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza","volume":"50 1-2","pages":"113-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
During the 17th century, between the second half of the 1630s and the years of the 1640s, the town of Leyden became an important center for the experimentation, discussion, and dissemination related to the discovery of blood circulation and the emerging doctrine of digestion. People such as Jean de Walaeus, Franz de le Boë (Sylvius), and Thomas Bartholinus worked there. No less passionate, in this circle, was the activity of the two printers Jean Maire and Franciscus Hackius. In this context, between 1640 and 1643, also René Descartes sojourned in Leyden, living first in the city and then in the castle of Engeest. Two of Descartes' letters to Henricus Regius, and one to Marin Mersenne, date back tothis period. In each letter, the philosopher, solicited by his intelocutors, responds to issues regarding digestion and tied to the discovery of the venae lacteae (lacteal vessels) on thepart of Gaspare Aselli. Referring with all probability to these letters (and to La description du corps humain). Louis De La Forge, in his commentary on L'Home (1664), is the first to mention the assent of Descartes to the discovery of Aselli and the next one of Jean Pecquet (receptaculum chyli). Prompted by La Forge's commentary, the article examines the three letters mentioned above. Proceeding with the examination of Lespassions de l'âme (a work about whose writing it formulates its own hypothesis) and of La description du corps humain, it reaches the conclusion that in Descartes the doctrine of digestion, while playing an important role in his physiology, nevertheless remains on the margin of the discoveries and of the contemporary debate.
在17世纪,从17世纪30年代后半期到17世纪40年代,莱顿镇成为一个重要的实验、讨论和传播中心,这些实验、讨论和传播与发现血液循环和新兴的消化学说有关。让·德·瓦莱乌斯、弗朗兹·德·勒Boë(西尔维乌斯)和托马斯·巴托利努斯等人在那里工作。在这个圈子里,让·梅尔和弗朗西斯·哈库斯这两位印刷工的活动也同样热烈。在此背景下,1640年至1643年间,笛卡尔也在莱顿逗留,先住在莱顿,后住在恩格斯城堡。笛卡儿写给亨利库斯·雷吉斯的两封信和一封写给马林·梅森的信都可以追溯到这个时期。在每封信中,这位哲学家在他的智力者的请求下,回应了有关消化的问题,并与加斯帕雷·阿塞利发现的乳糜管(venae lacteae)联系在一起。很可能是指这些信件(以及La description du corps humain)。Louis De La Forge在他对L'Home(1664)的评论中,第一个提到笛卡尔对Aselli的发现的赞同,其次是Jean Pecquet的发现。在拉福吉评论的推动下,本文考察了上述三封信。接着考察了《les passpasses de l' me》(它对其写作提出了自己的假设)和《人类的描述》,得出的结论是,在笛卡儿身上,消化学说虽然在他的生理学中起着重要作用,但仍然处于发现和当代辩论的边缘。