[RADICAL SEGMENTECTOMY AND WEDGE RESECTION FOR GOOD-RISK PATIENTS WITH PERIPHERAL CT1AN0M0 LUNG CANCERRADICAL SEGMENTECTOMY AND WEDGE RESECTION FOR GOOD-RISK PATIENTS WITH PERIPHERAL CT1AN0M0 LUNG CANCER].

Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi Pub Date : 2016-07-01
Masahiro Yoshimura
{"title":"[RADICAL SEGMENTECTOMY AND WEDGE RESECTION FOR GOOD-RISK PATIENTS WITH PERIPHERAL CT1AN0M0 LUNG CANCERRADICAL SEGMENTECTOMY AND WEDGE RESECTION FOR GOOD-RISK PATIENTS WITH PERIPHERAL CT1AN0M0 LUNG CANCER].","authors":"Masahiro Yoshimura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lobectomy has been and remains the standard surgical treatment for peripheral cT1aN0M0 lung cancer because of the conclusion of the randomized controlled trial performed by the Lung Cancer Study Group in 1995, and limited resection (segmentectomy and wedge resection) is still not the standard treatment for patients who are candidates for lobectomy; limited resection compared with lobectomy was statistically associated with a significantly greater incidence of local recurrence, although no statistically significant difference was identified in overall survival. In 2002, a Japanese prospective single-arm study of peripheral cT1aN0M0 lung cancer revealed no significantly different outcomes between segmentectomy and lobectomy with aggressive lymph node examination using frozen sections and wide surgical margins; the 5-year survival rate was 81.8% and local recurrence rate was 1.8%. Recently, two clinical trials conducted by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) have completed patient enrollment: JCOG0802, a phase III randomized trial of lobectomy versus segmentectomy for small peripheral non-small cell lung cancer; and JCOG0804, a nonrandomized confirmatory study of limited surgical resection for peripheral early lung cancer as defined based on thoracic thin-section computed tomography. The results will be published in the near future, and the standard treatment for peripheral cT1aN0M0 lung cancer may change.</p>","PeriodicalId":19165,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi","volume":"117 4","pages":"278-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lobectomy has been and remains the standard surgical treatment for peripheral cT1aN0M0 lung cancer because of the conclusion of the randomized controlled trial performed by the Lung Cancer Study Group in 1995, and limited resection (segmentectomy and wedge resection) is still not the standard treatment for patients who are candidates for lobectomy; limited resection compared with lobectomy was statistically associated with a significantly greater incidence of local recurrence, although no statistically significant difference was identified in overall survival. In 2002, a Japanese prospective single-arm study of peripheral cT1aN0M0 lung cancer revealed no significantly different outcomes between segmentectomy and lobectomy with aggressive lymph node examination using frozen sections and wide surgical margins; the 5-year survival rate was 81.8% and local recurrence rate was 1.8%. Recently, two clinical trials conducted by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) have completed patient enrollment: JCOG0802, a phase III randomized trial of lobectomy versus segmentectomy for small peripheral non-small cell lung cancer; and JCOG0804, a nonrandomized confirmatory study of limited surgical resection for peripheral early lung cancer as defined based on thoracic thin-section computed tomography. The results will be published in the near future, and the standard treatment for peripheral cT1aN0M0 lung cancer may change.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
【外周型肺癌高危患者行根治性节段切除术和楔形切除术】。
由于1995年肺癌研究组进行的随机对照试验的结论,肺叶切除术一直是并且仍然是外周型cT1aN0M0肺癌的标准手术治疗,而有限切除术(节段切除术和楔形切除术)仍然不是肺叶切除术候选患者的标准治疗;有限切除与肺叶切除术相比,在统计学上与更大的局部复发率相关,尽管在总生存期上没有统计学上的显著差异。2002年,日本一项针对外周cT1aN0M0肺癌的前瞻性单臂研究显示,采用冷冻切片和宽手术切缘进行侵袭性淋巴结检查的节段切除术和肺叶切除术的预后无显著差异;5年生存率为81.8%,局部复发率为1.8%。最近,由日本临床肿瘤小组(JCOG)进行的两项临床试验完成了患者入组:JCOG0802,一项针对小外周非小细胞肺癌的肺叶切除术与节段切除术的III期随机试验;JCOG0804是一项基于胸部薄层计算机断层扫描定义的外周性早期肺癌有限手术切除的非随机验证性研究。结果将在不久的将来公布,外周cT1aN0M0肺癌的标准治疗可能会发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[NEXT STAGE OF NATIONAL CLINICAL DATABASE]. [RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SURGICAL PROCEDURES AND THEIR SURGEON’S FEE]. [PERIOPERATIVE ORAL MANAGEMENT FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER AND LUNG CANCER SURGERY]. [BASIC RESEARCH BY SURGEONS]. [WHAT IS MENTAL PREPARATION OF LEADER TO ACHIEVE GENDER EQUALITY OF IDEAL]?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1