A Rasch Model Analysis of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire.

Journal of applied measurement Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Michael J Ireland, Hong Eng Goh, Ida Marais
{"title":"A Rasch Model Analysis of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire.","authors":"Michael J Ireland,&nbsp;Hong Eng Goh,&nbsp;Ida Marais","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 10-item Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) was developed to measure individual differences in the tendency to use two common emotion regulation strategies: cognitive reappraisal and suppression. The current study examined the psychometric properties of the ERQ in a heterogeneous mixed sample of 713 (64.9% female) community residents using the polytomous Rasch model. The results showed that the 10-item ERQ was multidimensional and supported the two distinct factors. The reappraisal and suppression subscales were both found to be unidimensional and fit the Rasch model. No evidence of local dependence was observed. The five response categories also functioned as intended. Differential item functioning (DIF) was assessed across sub-samples defined by gender, self-report experiencing symptoms of mental illness, regular meditation practice, and age groupings. No evidence emerged of items functioning differently across any of these groups. Using Rasch measure scores, a number of meaningful group differences in person location emerged. Less use of reappraisal was reported by younger adults, non-meditators, and those reporting experiencing symptoms of mental illness. Non-meditators also reported greater use of suppression compared with regular meditators; no other age group, gender, or symptomatic group differences emerged on suppression.</p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"19 3","pages":"258-270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 10-item Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) was developed to measure individual differences in the tendency to use two common emotion regulation strategies: cognitive reappraisal and suppression. The current study examined the psychometric properties of the ERQ in a heterogeneous mixed sample of 713 (64.9% female) community residents using the polytomous Rasch model. The results showed that the 10-item ERQ was multidimensional and supported the two distinct factors. The reappraisal and suppression subscales were both found to be unidimensional and fit the Rasch model. No evidence of local dependence was observed. The five response categories also functioned as intended. Differential item functioning (DIF) was assessed across sub-samples defined by gender, self-report experiencing symptoms of mental illness, regular meditation practice, and age groupings. No evidence emerged of items functioning differently across any of these groups. Using Rasch measure scores, a number of meaningful group differences in person location emerged. Less use of reappraisal was reported by younger adults, non-meditators, and those reporting experiencing symptoms of mental illness. Non-meditators also reported greater use of suppression compared with regular meditators; no other age group, gender, or symptomatic group differences emerged on suppression.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情绪调节问卷的Rasch模型分析。
本研究编制了10项情绪调节问卷(ERQ),以衡量个体在使用认知重评和抑制两种常见情绪调节策略的倾向上的差异。本研究采用多分体Rasch模型,对713名社区居民(女性占64.9%)的异质性混合样本进行了ERQ的心理测量。结果表明,10项ERQ是多维的,并支持这两个因素的显著性。重评和抑制分量表均为单维,符合Rasch模型。没有观察到局部依赖性的证据。五个回应类别也发挥了预期的作用。差异项目功能(DIF)在由性别、自我报告经历精神疾病症状、定期冥想练习和年龄组定义的子样本中进行评估。没有证据表明这些物品在任何一组中都有不同的功能。使用Rasch测量分数,在人的位置上出现了一些有意义的群体差异。年轻人、非冥想者和报告有精神疾病症状的人较少使用重新评估。与定期冥想者相比,非冥想者也报告了更多的压抑;在抑制方面没有其他年龄组、性别或症状组的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validation of Egalitarian Education Questionnaire using Rasch Measurement Model. Bootstrap Estimate of Bias for Intraclass Correlation. Rasch's Logistic Model Applied to Growth. Psychometric Properties of the General Movement Optimality Score using Rasch Measurement. Rasch Analysis of the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale: Evidence for the Abbreviated Version.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1