Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan or Chlorthalidone vs. Combined Valsartan and Chlorthalidone in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension: The VACLOR Study.

IF 2.3 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology Pub Date : 2018-09-03 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179546818796482
Fernando Manzur, Andrés Rico, Juan Diego Romero, Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan or Chlorthalidone vs. Combined Valsartan and Chlorthalidone in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension: The VACLOR Study.","authors":"Fernando Manzur,&nbsp;Andrés Rico,&nbsp;Juan Diego Romero,&nbsp;Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez","doi":"10.1177/1179546818796482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of valsartan (V) or chlorthalidone (C) monotherapy in comparison with a fixed combination of valsartan and chlorthalidone (V + C).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 12-week multicenter randomized three-arm open-label study randomly allocated 72 patients to V or C as monotherapy or a combination of V + C. The aim was to measure changes in office systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) from baseline to week 12, in addition to medication tolerability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of patients achieving target BP in office at week 12 was not statistically different for the three groups. However, comparisons of daytime and nighttime 24-hour ABPM values from baseline to week 12 revealed significant differences in nighttime mean SBP for the three groups, due to a significantly greater reduction in the values in patients assigned to the V + C group (-14.7 vs. -8.7 vs. -10.7, <i>P</i> = .042, V+C; V; C, respectively). Although patients assigned to the V + C group also had greater nighttime reduction in mean DBP values compared with those in the other groups, this difference was not statistically significant. The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with hypertension treated with V, C, and both medications combined, the fixed combination of V + C provided a significantly greater reduction of late night to early morning BP values when interventions were assessed with 24-hour ABPM.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT.01850160, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01850160.</p>","PeriodicalId":10419,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology","volume":"12 ","pages":"1179546818796482"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179546818796482","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179546818796482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of valsartan (V) or chlorthalidone (C) monotherapy in comparison with a fixed combination of valsartan and chlorthalidone (V + C).

Methods: This 12-week multicenter randomized three-arm open-label study randomly allocated 72 patients to V or C as monotherapy or a combination of V + C. The aim was to measure changes in office systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) from baseline to week 12, in addition to medication tolerability.

Results: The proportion of patients achieving target BP in office at week 12 was not statistically different for the three groups. However, comparisons of daytime and nighttime 24-hour ABPM values from baseline to week 12 revealed significant differences in nighttime mean SBP for the three groups, due to a significantly greater reduction in the values in patients assigned to the V + C group (-14.7 vs. -8.7 vs. -10.7, P = .042, V+C; V; C, respectively). Although patients assigned to the V + C group also had greater nighttime reduction in mean DBP values compared with those in the other groups, this difference was not statistically significant. The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly.

Conclusion: In patients with hypertension treated with V, C, and both medications combined, the fixed combination of V + C provided a significantly greater reduction of late night to early morning BP values when interventions were assessed with 24-hour ABPM.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT.01850160, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01850160.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缬沙坦或氯噻酮与缬沙坦和氯噻酮联合治疗轻中度高血压的疗效和安全性:VACLOR研究
目的:评价缬沙坦(V)或氯噻酮(C)单药治疗与缬沙坦与氯噻酮(V + C)固定联合治疗的疗效和安全性。这项为期12周的多中心随机三组开放标签研究随机分配72例患者接受V或C单药治疗或V + C联合治疗,目的是测量从基线到第12周的办公室收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)以及24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)的变化,以及药物耐受性。结果:三组患者在第12周达到目标血压的比例无统计学差异。然而,从基线到第12周,白天和夜间24小时ABPM值的比较显示,三组夜间平均收缩压有显著差异,原因是V+C组患者的收缩压值显著降低(-14.7 vs. -8.7 vs. -10.7, P = 0.042, V+C;V;C,分别)。虽然与其他组相比,V + C组的患者夜间平均DBP值也有更大的下降,但这种差异没有统计学意义。两组不良事件发生率无显著差异。结论:在接受V、C和两种药物联合治疗的高血压患者中,当采用24小时ABPM评估干预措施时,V + C的固定组合可显著降低深夜至清晨的血压值。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT.01850160, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01850160。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology
Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Classification of Infiltrative Heart Diseases MORAL-STAGE System. One-Year Prognosis Difference of Myocardial Infarction With or Without Coronary Obstruction in Developing Countries: Insights From the Moroccan Experience. The Impact of a Medication Therapy Management Service on the Outcomes of Hypertension Treatment Follow-Up Care in an Ethiopian Tertiary Hospital: A Pre-Post Interventional Study. Pulmonary Hypertension and Right Ventricle: A Pathophysiological Insight. Influence of Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of 250 684 Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1