The Use of Ultrasound Simulators to Strengthen Scanning Skills in Medical Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Pub Date : 2018-09-12 DOI:10.1002/jum.14805
Cathie-Kim Le MD, John Lewis MD, Peter Steinmetz MD, Alina Dyachenko MSc, Sharon Oleskevich PhD
{"title":"The Use of Ultrasound Simulators to Strengthen Scanning Skills in Medical Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Cathie-Kim Le MD,&nbsp;John Lewis MD,&nbsp;Peter Steinmetz MD,&nbsp;Alina Dyachenko MSc,&nbsp;Sharon Oleskevich PhD","doi":"10.1002/jum.14805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluates the use of ultrasound simulators for retaining and improving ultrasound skills acquired in undergraduate ultrasound training.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fourth-year medical students (n = 19) with prior training in point-of-care sonography for shock assessment were recruited for this study. Students were randomly assigned to a study group (n = 10) that followed an undergraduate ultrasound training curriculum, then used a simulator to complete 2 self-directed practice ultrasound sessions over 4 weeks. The control group (n = 9) followed the same undergraduate ultrasound training curriculum and received no additional access to a simulator or ultrasound training. A blinded assessment of the students was performed before and after the 4-week study period to evaluate their image acquisition skills on standardized patients (practical examination). To evaluate the student's clinical understanding of pathological ultrasound images, students watched short videos of prerecorded ultrasound scans and were asked to complete a 22-point questionnaire to identify their findings (visual examination).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All results were adjusted to pretest performance. The students in the study group performed better than those in the control group on the visual examination (80.1% versus 58.9%; <i>P</i> = .003) and on the practical examination (77.7% versus 57.0%; <i>P</i> = .105) after the 4-week study period. The score difference on the postintervention practical examinations was significantly better for the study group compared to the control group (11.6% versus –9.9%; <i>P</i> = .0007).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The use of ultrasound simulators may be a useful tool to help previously trained medical students retain and improve point-of-care ultrasound skills and knowledge.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"38 5","pages":"1249-1257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jum.14805","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jum.14805","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Objectives

This study evaluates the use of ultrasound simulators for retaining and improving ultrasound skills acquired in undergraduate ultrasound training.

Methods

Fourth-year medical students (n = 19) with prior training in point-of-care sonography for shock assessment were recruited for this study. Students were randomly assigned to a study group (n = 10) that followed an undergraduate ultrasound training curriculum, then used a simulator to complete 2 self-directed practice ultrasound sessions over 4 weeks. The control group (n = 9) followed the same undergraduate ultrasound training curriculum and received no additional access to a simulator or ultrasound training. A blinded assessment of the students was performed before and after the 4-week study period to evaluate their image acquisition skills on standardized patients (practical examination). To evaluate the student's clinical understanding of pathological ultrasound images, students watched short videos of prerecorded ultrasound scans and were asked to complete a 22-point questionnaire to identify their findings (visual examination).

Results

All results were adjusted to pretest performance. The students in the study group performed better than those in the control group on the visual examination (80.1% versus 58.9%; P = .003) and on the practical examination (77.7% versus 57.0%; P = .105) after the 4-week study period. The score difference on the postintervention practical examinations was significantly better for the study group compared to the control group (11.6% versus –9.9%; P = .0007).

Conclusion

The use of ultrasound simulators may be a useful tool to help previously trained medical students retain and improve point-of-care ultrasound skills and knowledge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用超声模拟器加强医学生扫描技能:一项随机对照试验
目的本研究评估超声模拟器在保留和提高本科超声训练中获得的超声技能中的应用。方法:本研究招募了19名接受过现场超声检查休克评估培训的四年级医学生。学生被随机分配到一个研究小组(n = 10),该小组遵循本科超声训练课程,然后使用模拟器在4周内完成2次自主超声练习。对照组(n = 9)遵循相同的本科超声训练课程,没有额外的模拟器或超声训练。在为期4周的研究前后,对学生进行盲法评估,以评估他们对标准化患者的图像采集技能(实践检查)。为了评估学生对病理超声图像的临床理解,学生观看了预先录制的超声扫描的短视频,并被要求完成一份22分的问卷,以确定他们的发现(视觉检查)。结果所有结果均调整至测试前性能。实验组学生在视力检查上的表现优于对照组学生(80.1%对58.9%;P = 0.003)和实践考试(77.7% vs . 57.0%;P = .105)。实验组干预后实践测试得分差异显著优于对照组(11.6% vs -9.9%;p = .0007)。结论超声模拟器的使用可能是一种有用的工具,可以帮助以前受过训练的医学生保留和提高现场超声技能和知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
期刊最新文献
A Novel Semi-Quantified Method for Grading Sonographic Severity of Adenomyosis and its Relation With Clinical Symptoms: An Observational Study. Decoding the Echoes: Advancing Ultrasound Habitat Radiomics for Precision Nodal Staging in Breast Cancer. Breaking Bad News in Ultrasound: Perspectives From Radiologists and Radiology Residents From a Developing Nation. A Study on the Characteristics of Sonazoid Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Transitional Phase for Common Focal Liver Lesions and Its Value in Differential Diagnosis. Re: Timor-Tritsch IE, et al. "Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Spectrum." J Ultrasound Med. 2025.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1