Impacts of Related Risk Factors on the Efficacy of Interventional Treatment Towards Intractable Postpartum Hemorrhage.

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine 生殖医学杂志 Pub Date : 2016-11-01
Ningdong Pang, Chao Zhao, Chunming Xie, Minling Yang, Duiping Feng, Yi Chen
{"title":"Impacts of Related Risk Factors on the Efficacy of Interventional Treatment Towards Intractable Postpartum Hemorrhage.","authors":"Ningdong Pang,&nbsp;Chao Zhao,&nbsp;Chunming Xie,&nbsp;Minling Yang,&nbsp;Duiping Feng,&nbsp;Yi Chen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the risk factors that impact the efficacy of interventional treatment of intractable postpartum hemorrhage (IPH).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A total of 64 IPH patients were admitted and received interventional treatment at First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from January 2012 to September 2014, among whom 57 cases were successfully treated (bleeding stopped), while 7 cases failed. The clinical data of the success group and the failure group were observed for the multivariate analysis of the possible reasons that might cause hemostatic failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The univariate analysis of each suspected factor of hemostatic failure showed that history of uterine scar, combined use of uterotonics, uterine inertia, and placenta exhibited statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (p<0.05); the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that history of uterine scar and combined use of uterotonics were the risk factors for the interventional treatment failure of IPH, with OR values of 11.23 (95% CI 1.26~100.22) and 12.83 (95% CI 1.05-156.34), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>History of uterine scar and combined use of uterotonics were the risk factors for interventional treatment failure of IPH.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"61 11-12","pages":"569-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the risk factors that impact the efficacy of interventional treatment of intractable postpartum hemorrhage (IPH).

Study design: A total of 64 IPH patients were admitted and received interventional treatment at First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from January 2012 to September 2014, among whom 57 cases were successfully treated (bleeding stopped), while 7 cases failed. The clinical data of the success group and the failure group were observed for the multivariate analysis of the possible reasons that might cause hemostatic failure.

Results: The univariate analysis of each suspected factor of hemostatic failure showed that history of uterine scar, combined use of uterotonics, uterine inertia, and placenta exhibited statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (p<0.05); the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that history of uterine scar and combined use of uterotonics were the risk factors for the interventional treatment failure of IPH, with OR values of 11.23 (95% CI 1.26~100.22) and 12.83 (95% CI 1.05-156.34), respectively.

Conclusion: History of uterine scar and combined use of uterotonics were the risk factors for interventional treatment failure of IPH.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相关危险因素对难治性产后出血介入治疗疗效的影响。
目的:探讨影响难治性产后出血(IPH)介入治疗效果的危险因素。研究设计:2012年1月至2014年9月,山西医科大学第一医院共收治IPH患者64例,其中治疗成功(止血)57例,治疗失败7例。观察成功组和失败组的临床资料,对可能导致止血失败的原因进行多因素分析。结果:各可疑止血失败因素的单因素分析显示,子宫瘢痕史、联合使用子宫紧张剂、子宫惯性、胎盘在两组间差异均有统计学意义(p)。结论:子宫瘢痕史、联合使用子宫紧张剂是IPH介入治疗失败的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
生殖医学杂志
生殖医学杂志 医学-妇产科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6427
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.
期刊最新文献
Role of Capecitabine in the Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Drug for Two Settings. Comparison of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Using a Ring-Shaped Loop Versus a Right-Angled Triangular Loop. Gene Expression Analysis Identifies Common and Distinct Signatures Underlying Ductal and Lobular Breast Cancers. Analysis of Related Causes for No Embryos Transferred and Corresponding Coping Measures in Assisted Reproductive Technology. Cesarean Section Rates and Clinical Indications at a Large North African Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1