Clinical Risk Factors Do Not Predict Shoulder Dystocia.
IF 0.2 4区 医学Q4 Medicine生殖医学杂志Pub Date : 2016-11-01
Joseph G Ouzounian, Lisa M Korst, Michelle Sanchez, Suneet Chauhan, Robert B Gherman, Neisha Opper, Melissa L Wilson
{"title":"Clinical Risk Factors Do Not Predict Shoulder Dystocia.","authors":"Joseph G Ouzounian, Lisa M Korst, Michelle Sanchez, Suneet Chauhan, Robert B Gherman, Neisha Opper, Melissa L Wilson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare 2 different risk factor models for the prediction of shoulder dystocia.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of women with vaginal deliveries at a single institution over an 8-year period. Two distinct multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the occurrence of shoulder dystocia: a traditional model used information based on birthweight and macrosomia, and a clinical model used information based on esti-mated fetal weight and suspected macrosomia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 13,998 deliveries analyzed, there were 221 cases of shoulder dystocia (1.6%). In addition to the macrosomia or suspected macrosomia variables, the final models included prolonged second stage of labor, diabetes status, and oxytocin use. Neither model was highly sensitive or highly specific, and neither demonstrated a cutoff threshold that yielded a clinically viable PPV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the presence of 1 or more risk factors for shoulder dystocia, its occurrence remains largely an unpredictable clinical event.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"61 11-12","pages":"575-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare 2 different risk factor models for the prediction of shoulder dystocia.
Study design: We performed a retrospective study of women with vaginal deliveries at a single institution over an 8-year period. Two distinct multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the occurrence of shoulder dystocia: a traditional model used information based on birthweight and macrosomia, and a clinical model used information based on esti-mated fetal weight and suspected macrosomia.
Results: Of the 13,998 deliveries analyzed, there were 221 cases of shoulder dystocia (1.6%). In addition to the macrosomia or suspected macrosomia variables, the final models included prolonged second stage of labor, diabetes status, and oxytocin use. Neither model was highly sensitive or highly specific, and neither demonstrated a cutoff threshold that yielded a clinically viable PPV.
Conclusion: Despite the presence of 1 or more risk factors for shoulder dystocia, its occurrence remains largely an unpredictable clinical event.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.