Young Women’s Attitudes Towards Modern Reproductive Practices: A Survey Study Assessing What Young Women Want.

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine 生殖医学杂志 Pub Date : 2017-03-01
Sarah Druckenmiller, Shannon DeVore, Jaime M Knopman, Nicole Noyes
{"title":"Young Women’s Attitudes Towards Modern Reproductive Practices: A Survey Study Assessing What Young Women Want.","authors":"Sarah Druckenmiller,&nbsp;Shannon DeVore,&nbsp;Jaime M Knopman,&nbsp;Nicole Noyes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess young women’s preferences and attitudes towards various options to create families at a time when women are increasingly postponing childbearing due to greater career focus and widespread availability of contraceptives.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Reported data were obtained from an electronic survey distributed over 6 months to approximately 7,000 females enrolled in American universities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents ranked preferable childbearing modalities as follows: natural conception, assisted reproductive technologies, adoption, anonymous oocyte donation, and directed oocyte donation. The majority would consider using autologous oocyte cryopreservation for childbearing, but only a minority saw oocyte donation as a viable option. When queried about donating oocytes, 61% said they would donate to a sibling/friend, 51% to research, and 40% for clinical usage. Most would prefer to receive donation outcome information and would be comfortable being contacted by offspring. Most believed selecting recipient characteristics would increase their likelihood of donation, and 43% felt donors should receive additional compensation for desirable characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reproductive autonomy and fertility preservation are important to young educated females, a population sought-after for oocyte donation. Potential donors’ desires for additional rights merit consideration as oocyte demand increases and frozen-oocyte banks emerge.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"62 3-4","pages":"111-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess young women’s preferences and attitudes towards various options to create families at a time when women are increasingly postponing childbearing due to greater career focus and widespread availability of contraceptives.

Study design: Reported data were obtained from an electronic survey distributed over 6 months to approximately 7,000 females enrolled in American universities.

Results: Most respondents ranked preferable childbearing modalities as follows: natural conception, assisted reproductive technologies, adoption, anonymous oocyte donation, and directed oocyte donation. The majority would consider using autologous oocyte cryopreservation for childbearing, but only a minority saw oocyte donation as a viable option. When queried about donating oocytes, 61% said they would donate to a sibling/friend, 51% to research, and 40% for clinical usage. Most would prefer to receive donation outcome information and would be comfortable being contacted by offspring. Most believed selecting recipient characteristics would increase their likelihood of donation, and 43% felt donors should receive additional compensation for desirable characteristics.

Conclusion: Reproductive autonomy and fertility preservation are important to young educated females, a population sought-after for oocyte donation. Potential donors’ desires for additional rights merit consideration as oocyte demand increases and frozen-oocyte banks emerge.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年轻女性对现代生殖行为的态度:一项评估年轻女性需求的调查研究。
目的:评估年轻女性对建立家庭的各种选择的偏好和态度,目前由于对职业的更多关注和避孕药具的广泛可用性,女性越来越推迟生育。研究设计:报告的数据来自一项为期6个月的电子调查,调查对象是在美国大学注册的约7000名女性。结果:大多数受访者认为自然受孕、辅助生殖技术、收养、匿名捐卵和定向捐卵是首选的生育方式。大多数人会考虑使用自体卵母细胞冷冻保存来生育,但只有少数人认为卵母细胞捐赠是一个可行的选择。当被问及捐赠卵母细胞时,61%的人表示他们会捐赠给兄弟姐妹/朋友,51%用于研究,40%用于临床使用。大多数人更愿意收到捐赠结果的信息,并且愿意与后代联系。大多数人认为选择接受者的特征会增加他们捐赠的可能性,43%的人认为捐赠者应该获得理想特征的额外补偿。结论:生殖自主和生育能力的保存对于年轻的受过教育的女性来说是重要的,这是一个受欢迎的卵母细胞捐赠群体。随着卵母细胞需求的增加和冷冻卵母细胞库的出现,潜在捐赠者对额外权利的渴望值得考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
生殖医学杂志
生殖医学杂志 医学-妇产科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6427
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.
期刊最新文献
Role of Capecitabine in the Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Drug for Two Settings. Comparison of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Using a Ring-Shaped Loop Versus a Right-Angled Triangular Loop. Gene Expression Analysis Identifies Common and Distinct Signatures Underlying Ductal and Lobular Breast Cancers. Analysis of Related Causes for No Embryos Transferred and Corresponding Coping Measures in Assisted Reproductive Technology. Cesarean Section Rates and Clinical Indications at a Large North African Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1