Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hysteroscopic Polypectomy Before Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation and Intrauterine Insemination in Infertile Women.

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine 生殖医学杂志 Pub Date : 2017-03-01
Lauren W Sundheimer, Anupama Kathiresan, Daniel Dumesic, Ram Parvataneni, Mousa Shamonki
{"title":"Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hysteroscopic Polypectomy Before Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation and Intrauterine Insemination in Infertile Women.","authors":"Lauren W Sundheimer,&nbsp;Anupama Kathiresan,&nbsp;Daniel Dumesic,&nbsp;Ram Parvataneni,&nbsp;Mousa Shamonki","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the cost benefit of performing hysteroscopic polypectomy (HP) in infertile women with endometrial polyp(s) before controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination (COH/IUI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Decision analytic model comparing costs and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HP and COH/IUI costs ranged from $537–$12,530 and $800–$7,600, respectively. Performing an HP before COH/IUI lowered fertility cost by $7,652 per clinical pregnancy. When COH/IUI costs remained constant, HP was most cost beneficial when the cost of HP was below a threshold value of $9,452. When HP costs remained constant, the threshold value at which HP was no longer cost beneficial was at COH/IUI costs below $704. The cost benefit was greatest when an office-based HP is performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HP before COH/IUI is more cost beneficial than fertility treatment alone, particularly when office-based hysteroscopy is performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"62 3-4","pages":"127-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the cost benefit of performing hysteroscopic polypectomy (HP) in infertile women with endometrial polyp(s) before controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination (COH/IUI).

Study design: Decision analytic model comparing costs and clinical outcomes.

Results: HP and COH/IUI costs ranged from $537–$12,530 and $800–$7,600, respectively. Performing an HP before COH/IUI lowered fertility cost by $7,652 per clinical pregnancy. When COH/IUI costs remained constant, HP was most cost beneficial when the cost of HP was below a threshold value of $9,452. When HP costs remained constant, the threshold value at which HP was no longer cost beneficial was at COH/IUI costs below $704. The cost benefit was greatest when an office-based HP is performed.

Conclusion: HP before COH/IUI is more cost beneficial than fertility treatment alone, particularly when office-based hysteroscopy is performed.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不孕症妇女控制性卵巢过度刺激和宫内人工授精前宫腔镜息肉切除术的成本-效益分析。
目的:探讨宫腔镜下息肉切除术(HP)治疗伴有子宫内膜息肉的不孕症妇女在控制性卵巢过度刺激联合宫内人工授精(COH/IUI)前的成本效益。研究设计:比较成本和临床结果的决策分析模型。结果:HP和COH/IUI成本分别为537 - 12530美元和800 - 7600美元。在COH/IUI前进行HP检查可使每个临床妊娠的生育成本降低7,652美元。当COH/IUI成本保持不变时,当HP成本低于9,452美元的阈值时,HP最具成本效益。当HP成本保持不变时,当COH/IUI成本低于704美元时,HP不再具有成本效益。当执行基于办公室的HP时,成本效益最大。结论:COH/IUI前HP比单独生育治疗更具成本效益,特别是在办公室宫腔镜下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
生殖医学杂志
生殖医学杂志 医学-妇产科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6427
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.
期刊最新文献
Role of Capecitabine in the Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Drug for Two Settings. Comparison of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Using a Ring-Shaped Loop Versus a Right-Angled Triangular Loop. Gene Expression Analysis Identifies Common and Distinct Signatures Underlying Ductal and Lobular Breast Cancers. Analysis of Related Causes for No Embryos Transferred and Corresponding Coping Measures in Assisted Reproductive Technology. Cesarean Section Rates and Clinical Indications at a Large North African Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1