National Center for Health Statistics Data Presentation Standards for Proportions.

Jennifer D Parker, Makram Talih, Donald J Malec, Vladislav Beresovsky, Margaret Carroll, Joe F Gonzalez, Brady E Hamilton, Deborah D Ingram, Kenneth Kochanek, Frances McCarty, Chris Moriarity, Iris Shimizu, Alexander Strashny, Brian W Ward
{"title":"National Center for Health Statistics Data Presentation Standards for Proportions.","authors":"Jennifer D Parker,&nbsp;Makram Talih,&nbsp;Donald J Malec,&nbsp;Vladislav Beresovsky,&nbsp;Margaret Carroll,&nbsp;Joe F Gonzalez,&nbsp;Brady E Hamilton,&nbsp;Deborah D Ingram,&nbsp;Kenneth Kochanek,&nbsp;Frances McCarty,&nbsp;Chris Moriarity,&nbsp;Iris Shimizu,&nbsp;Alexander Strashny,&nbsp;Brian W Ward","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) disseminates information on a broad range of health topics through diverse publications. These publications must rely on clear and transparent presentation standards that can be broadly and efficiently applied. Standards are particularly important for large, cross-cutting reports where estimates cannot be individually evaluated and indicators of precision cannot be included alongside the estimates. This report describes the NCHS Data Presentation Standards for Proportions. The multistep NCHS Data Presentation Standards for Proportions are based on a minimum denominator sample size and on the absolute and relative widths of a confidence interval calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. Proportions (usually multiplied by 100 and expressed as percentages) are the most commonly reported estimates in NCHS reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":23577,"journal":{"name":"Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research","volume":" 175","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) disseminates information on a broad range of health topics through diverse publications. These publications must rely on clear and transparent presentation standards that can be broadly and efficiently applied. Standards are particularly important for large, cross-cutting reports where estimates cannot be individually evaluated and indicators of precision cannot be included alongside the estimates. This report describes the NCHS Data Presentation Standards for Proportions. The multistep NCHS Data Presentation Standards for Proportions are based on a minimum denominator sample size and on the absolute and relative widths of a confidence interval calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. Proportions (usually multiplied by 100 and expressed as percentages) are the most commonly reported estimates in NCHS reports.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家卫生统计中心比例数据呈现标准。
国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)通过各种出版物传播关于广泛卫生主题的信息。这些出版物必须依靠清晰和透明的表示标准,这些标准可以广泛和有效地应用。标准对于大型的、跨领域的报告尤其重要,因为这些报告不能单独评估估计,也不能在估计中包括精度指标。本报告描述了NCHS比例数据表示标准。多步NCHS数据表示标准的比例是基于最小分母样本量和绝对和相对宽度的置信区间计算使用克洛珀-皮尔逊方法。比例(通常乘以100并以百分比表示)是国家人口统计中心报告中最常报告的估计值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Studies of new statistical methodology including experimental tests of new survey methods, studies of vital statistics collection methods, new analytical techniques, objective evaluations of reliability of collected data, and contributions to statistical theory. Studies also include comparison of U.S. methodology with those of other countries.
期刊最新文献
Calibration Weighting Methods for the National Center for Health Statistics Research and Development Survey. Assessing Linkage Eligibility Bias in the National Health Interview Survey. Assessing Linkage Eligibility Bias in the National Health Interview Survey. An Investigation of Nonresponse Bias and Survey Location Variability in the 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2015-2018: Sample Design and Estimation Procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1