How television moved a nation: media, change and Indigenous rights.

Media, culture, and society Pub Date : 2018-10-01 Epub Date: 2018-02-01 DOI:10.1177/0163443718754650
Lisa Waller, Kerry McCallum
{"title":"How television moved a nation: media, change and Indigenous rights.","authors":"Lisa Waller,&nbsp;Kerry McCallum","doi":"10.1177/0163443718754650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the role of television in Australia's 1967 referendum, which is widely believed to have given rights to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. It presents an analysis of archival television footage to identify five stories that moved the nation: Australia's shame, civil rights and global connections, admirable activists, 'a fair go' and consensus. It argues that television shaped the wider culture and opened a channel of communication that allowed Indigenous activists and everyday people to speak directly to non-Indigenous people and other First Nations people throughout the land for the first time. The referendum narrative that television did so much to craft and promote marks the shift from an older form of settler nationalism that simply excluded Indigenous people, to an ongoing project that seeks to recognise, respect and 'reaccredit' the nation-state through incorporation of Indigenous narratives. We conclude that whereas television is understood to have 'united' the nation in 1967, 50 years later seismic shifts in media and society have made the quest for further constitutional reform on Indigenous rights and recognition more sophisticated, diffuse, complex and challenging.</p>","PeriodicalId":74138,"journal":{"name":"Media, culture, and society","volume":"40 7","pages":"992-1007"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0163443718754650","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media, culture, and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718754650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article examines the role of television in Australia's 1967 referendum, which is widely believed to have given rights to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. It presents an analysis of archival television footage to identify five stories that moved the nation: Australia's shame, civil rights and global connections, admirable activists, 'a fair go' and consensus. It argues that television shaped the wider culture and opened a channel of communication that allowed Indigenous activists and everyday people to speak directly to non-Indigenous people and other First Nations people throughout the land for the first time. The referendum narrative that television did so much to craft and promote marks the shift from an older form of settler nationalism that simply excluded Indigenous people, to an ongoing project that seeks to recognise, respect and 'reaccredit' the nation-state through incorporation of Indigenous narratives. We conclude that whereas television is understood to have 'united' the nation in 1967, 50 years later seismic shifts in media and society have made the quest for further constitutional reform on Indigenous rights and recognition more sophisticated, diffuse, complex and challenging.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电视如何推动一个国家:媒体、变革和土著权利。
本文考察了电视在1967年澳大利亚全民公决中的作用,人们普遍认为这次全民公决赋予了土著人和托雷斯海峡岛民权利。它通过对电视录像档案的分析,找出了五个感动全国的故事:澳大利亚的耻辱、公民权利和全球联系、令人钦佩的活动人士、“公平竞争”和共识。它认为,电视塑造了更广泛的文化,并开辟了一个交流渠道,使土著活动家和日常人民第一次能够直接与全国各地的非土著人民和其他第一民族人民交谈。电视精心制作和宣传的公投叙事标志着一种转变,从一种简单排斥土著人民的古老定居者民族主义形式,转变为一种正在进行的项目,寻求通过融入土著叙事来承认、尊重和“重新认可”民族国家。我们的结论是,尽管人们认为电视在1967年“团结”了这个国家,但50年后,媒体和社会的巨大变化使得对土著权利和承认的进一步宪法改革的追求变得更加复杂、分散、复杂和具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Poland as Gilead. Pop culture fiction and performative protests in the era of the pandemic Between existential mobility and intimacy 5.0: translocal care in pandemic times. Media power in digital Asia: Super apps and megacorps. More than a sex crime: a feminist political economy of the 2014 iCloud hack Beyond platform capitalism: critical perspectives on Facebook markets from Melanesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1