Bulgaria: Health System Review.

Q1 Medicine Health systems in transition Pub Date : 2018-09-01
Antoniya Dimova, Maria Rohova, Stefka Koeva, Elka Atanasova, Lubomira Koeva-Dimitrova, Todorka Kostadinova, Anne Spranger
{"title":"Bulgaria: Health System Review.","authors":"Antoniya Dimova,&nbsp;Maria Rohova,&nbsp;Stefka Koeva,&nbsp;Elka Atanasova,&nbsp;Lubomira Koeva-Dimitrova,&nbsp;Todorka Kostadinova,&nbsp;Anne Spranger","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This analysis of the Bulgarian health system reviews developments in its organization and governance, health financing, health care provision, health reforms and health system performance. With the 2015 National Health Strategy 2020 at its core, there have been ambitious reform plans to introduce more decentralization, strategic purchasing and integrated care into the Bulgarian social health insurance system. However, the main characteristics of the Bulgarian health system, including a high level of centralization and a single payer to administer social health insurance, remain intact and very few reforms have been implemented (for example, the introduction of health technology assessment). There are multiple reasons for this, of which political fragility and stakeholder resistance are among the most important. Overall, Bulgaria marked notable progress on some health indicators (for example, life expectancy and infant mortality) but generally progress lags behind EU averages. What is more, the system has not been effective in reducing amenable mortality, as reflected in the unsteady improvement patterns in mortality due to malignant neoplasms. This is despite an increase in total health expenditure as a percentage of gross domestic product to 8.2% in 2015. The overall high out-of-pocket spending (47.7% of total health spending in 2015) has been growing and is increasingly worrisome. It evidences the low degree of financial protection by the Bulgarian social health insurance system and exacerbates the already considerable inequities along socioeconomic and regional fault lines. For instance, there are regional imbalances of medical professionals, which are more concentrated in urban areas, and accessibility to physicians is further deteriorating, especially in rural areas. Current reforms have to tackle these challenges and build consensus among stakeholders of the health system to unlock the standstill.</p>","PeriodicalId":38995,"journal":{"name":"Health systems in transition","volume":"20 4","pages":"1-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems in transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This analysis of the Bulgarian health system reviews developments in its organization and governance, health financing, health care provision, health reforms and health system performance. With the 2015 National Health Strategy 2020 at its core, there have been ambitious reform plans to introduce more decentralization, strategic purchasing and integrated care into the Bulgarian social health insurance system. However, the main characteristics of the Bulgarian health system, including a high level of centralization and a single payer to administer social health insurance, remain intact and very few reforms have been implemented (for example, the introduction of health technology assessment). There are multiple reasons for this, of which political fragility and stakeholder resistance are among the most important. Overall, Bulgaria marked notable progress on some health indicators (for example, life expectancy and infant mortality) but generally progress lags behind EU averages. What is more, the system has not been effective in reducing amenable mortality, as reflected in the unsteady improvement patterns in mortality due to malignant neoplasms. This is despite an increase in total health expenditure as a percentage of gross domestic product to 8.2% in 2015. The overall high out-of-pocket spending (47.7% of total health spending in 2015) has been growing and is increasingly worrisome. It evidences the low degree of financial protection by the Bulgarian social health insurance system and exacerbates the already considerable inequities along socioeconomic and regional fault lines. For instance, there are regional imbalances of medical professionals, which are more concentrated in urban areas, and accessibility to physicians is further deteriorating, especially in rural areas. Current reforms have to tackle these challenges and build consensus among stakeholders of the health system to unlock the standstill.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保加利亚:卫生系统审查。
对保加利亚卫生系统的分析审查了其组织和治理、卫生筹资、卫生保健提供、卫生改革和卫生系统绩效方面的发展。以《2015年国家卫生战略2020》为核心,制定了雄心勃勃的改革计划,将更多的权力下放、战略采购和综合护理纳入保加利亚社会健康保险体系。然而,保加利亚保健系统的主要特点,包括高度集中和单一付款人管理社会健康保险,仍然保持不变,很少实施改革(例如,实行保健技术评估)。造成这种情况的原因有很多,其中最重要的是政治脆弱性和利益相关者的抵制。总体而言,保加利亚在某些健康指标(例如预期寿命和婴儿死亡率)方面取得了显著进展,但总体进展落后于欧盟平均水平。更重要的是,从恶性肿瘤死亡率不稳定的改善模式可以看出,该系统在降低可控制的死亡率方面没有效果。尽管卫生总支出占国内生产总值的百分比在2015年增加到8.2%。总体高自费支出(2015年占卫生总支出的47.7%)一直在增长,并日益令人担忧。它证明保加利亚社会健康保险制度的财政保护程度较低,并加剧了沿社会经济和区域断层线已经相当严重的不平等现象。例如,医疗专业人员的区域不平衡,这些专业人员更多地集中在城市地区,获得医生的机会进一步恶化,特别是在农村地区。当前的改革必须应对这些挑战,并在卫生系统的利益攸关方之间建立共识,以打破僵局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health systems in transition
Health systems in transition Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Denmark: Health System Review. Estonia: Health System Review. Sweden: Health System Review. France: Health System Review. Health and Care Data: Approaches to data linkage for evidence-informed policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1