Associations between Practitioner Personality and Client Quit Rates in Smoking Cessation Behavioural Support Interventions.

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Smoking Cessation Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.1017/jsc.2017.10
Heather L Gainforth, Sarita Y Aujla, Emma Beard, Emma Croghan, Robert West
{"title":"Associations between Practitioner Personality and Client Quit Rates in Smoking Cessation Behavioural Support Interventions.","authors":"Heather L Gainforth, Sarita Y Aujla, Emma Beard, Emma Croghan, Robert West","doi":"10.1017/jsc.2017.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> There is wide variation in the success rates of practitioners employed to help smokers to stop, even once a range of potential confounding factors has been taken into account. <b>Aim:</b> This paper examined whether personality characteristics of practitioners might play a role success rates. <b>Methods:</b> Data from 1,958 stop-smoking treatment episodes in two stop-smoking services (SSS) involving 19 stop-smoking practitioners were used in the analysis. The outcome measure was clients' biochemically verified quit status 4 weeks after the target quit date. The five dimensions of personality, as assessed by the Ten-Item Personality Inventory, were included as predictor variables: openness, conscientiousness, agreeableness, extraversion, and neuroticism. A range of client and other practitioner characteristics were used as covariates. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine if managers' ratings of practitioner personality were also associated with clients' quit status. <b>Results:</b> Multi-level random intercept models indicated that clients of practitioners with a higher extraversion score had greater odds of being abstinent at four weeks (self-assessed: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01-1.19; manager-assessed: OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.21-1.44). <b>Conclusions:</b> More extraverted stop smoking practitioners appear to have greater success in advising their clients to quit smoking. Findings need to be confirmed in larger practitioner populations, other SSS, and in different smoking cessation contexts. If confirmed, specific training may be needed to assist more introverted stop smoking practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"13 2","pages":"103-109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6160791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2017.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is wide variation in the success rates of practitioners employed to help smokers to stop, even once a range of potential confounding factors has been taken into account. Aim: This paper examined whether personality characteristics of practitioners might play a role success rates. Methods: Data from 1,958 stop-smoking treatment episodes in two stop-smoking services (SSS) involving 19 stop-smoking practitioners were used in the analysis. The outcome measure was clients' biochemically verified quit status 4 weeks after the target quit date. The five dimensions of personality, as assessed by the Ten-Item Personality Inventory, were included as predictor variables: openness, conscientiousness, agreeableness, extraversion, and neuroticism. A range of client and other practitioner characteristics were used as covariates. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine if managers' ratings of practitioner personality were also associated with clients' quit status. Results: Multi-level random intercept models indicated that clients of practitioners with a higher extraversion score had greater odds of being abstinent at four weeks (self-assessed: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01-1.19; manager-assessed: OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.21-1.44). Conclusions: More extraverted stop smoking practitioners appear to have greater success in advising their clients to quit smoking. Findings need to be confirmed in larger practitioner populations, other SSS, and in different smoking cessation contexts. If confirmed, specific training may be needed to assist more introverted stop smoking practitioners.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
戒烟行为支持干预中从业者个性与客户戒烟率的关系。
引言:即使考虑到一系列潜在的混杂因素,受雇帮助吸烟者戒烟的从业者的成功率也存在很大差异。目的:研究从业者的人格特征是否对成功率起作用。方法:采用1958年两个戒烟服务机构(SSS)的戒烟治疗事件数据进行分析,涉及19名戒烟从业者。结果测量是在目标退出日期后4周,客户的生物化学验证退出状态。通过十项人格量表评估,人格的五个维度被纳入预测变量:开放性、尽责性、宜人性、外向性和神经质。一系列客户和其他从业者的特征被用作协变量。进行了敏感性分析,以确定管理人员对从业者个性的评分是否也与客户的辞职状态有关。结果:多水平随机截距模型表明,外向性得分较高的从业者的客户在四周内禁欲的几率更大(自我评估:OR=1.10,95%CI=1.01-1.19;经理评估:OR=1.32,95%CI=1.21-1.44)。结论:更多外向的戒烟从业者在建议客户戒烟方面似乎更成功。研究结果需要在更大的从业者群体、其他SSS和不同的戒烟环境中得到证实。如果得到证实,可能需要专门的培训来帮助更多内向的戒烟从业者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
"It Is A Carrot-Stick Model": A Qualitative Study of Rural-Serving Clinician and Rural-Residing Veteran Perceptions of Requirements to Quit Smoking prior to Elective Surgery. Prevalence, Correlates, and Perception of E-cigarettes among Undergraduate Students of Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Evaluation of an Integrated Tobacco Treatment Specialist in Primary Care. The Efficacy of Individualized, Community-Based Physical Activity to Aid Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Effects of Smoking on COVID-19 Management and Mortality: An Umbrella Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1