Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.

IF 98.4 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL The Lancet Pub Date : 2018-10-13 DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7
Ties Boerma, Carine Ronsmans, Dessalegn Y Melesse, Aluisio J D Barros, Fernando C Barros, Liang Juan, Ann-Beth Moller, Lale Say, Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor, Mu Yi, Dácio de Lyra Rabello Neto, Marleen Temmerman
{"title":"Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.","authors":"Ties Boerma,&nbsp;Carine Ronsmans,&nbsp;Dessalegn Y Melesse,&nbsp;Aluisio J D Barros,&nbsp;Fernando C Barros,&nbsp;Liang Juan,&nbsp;Ann-Beth Moller,&nbsp;Lale Say,&nbsp;Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor,&nbsp;Mu Yi,&nbsp;Dácio de Lyra Rabello Neto,&nbsp;Marleen Temmerman","doi":"10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this Series paper, we describe the frequency of, trends in, determinants of, and inequalities in caesarean section (CS) use, globally, regionally, and in selected countries. On the basis of data from 169 countries that include 98·4% of the world's births, we estimate that 29·7 million (21·1%, 95% uncertainty interval 19·9-22·4) births occurred through CS in 2015, which was almost double the number of births by this method in 2000 (16·0 million [12·1%, 10·9-13·3] births). CS use in 2015 was up to ten times more frequent in the Latin America and Caribbean region, where it was used in 44·3% (41·3-47·4) of births, than in the west and central Africa region, where it was used in 4·1% (3·6-4·6) of births. The global and regional increases in CS use were driven both by an increasing proportion of births occurring in health facilities (accounting for 66·5% of the global increase) and increases in CS use within health facilities (33·5%), with considerable variation between regions. Based on the most recent data available for each country, 15% of births in 106 (63%) of 169 countries were by CS, whereas 47 (28%) countries showed CS use in less than 10% of births. National CS use varied from 0·6% in South Sudan to 58·1% in the Dominican Republic. Within-country disparities in CS use were also very large: CS use was almost five times more frequent in births in the richest versus the poorest quintiles in low-income and middle-income countries; markedly high CS use was observed among low obstetric risk births, especially among more educated women in, for example, Brazil and China; and CS use was 1·6 times more frequent in private facilities than in public facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":18014,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":98.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7","citationCount":"793","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 793

Abstract

In this Series paper, we describe the frequency of, trends in, determinants of, and inequalities in caesarean section (CS) use, globally, regionally, and in selected countries. On the basis of data from 169 countries that include 98·4% of the world's births, we estimate that 29·7 million (21·1%, 95% uncertainty interval 19·9-22·4) births occurred through CS in 2015, which was almost double the number of births by this method in 2000 (16·0 million [12·1%, 10·9-13·3] births). CS use in 2015 was up to ten times more frequent in the Latin America and Caribbean region, where it was used in 44·3% (41·3-47·4) of births, than in the west and central Africa region, where it was used in 4·1% (3·6-4·6) of births. The global and regional increases in CS use were driven both by an increasing proportion of births occurring in health facilities (accounting for 66·5% of the global increase) and increases in CS use within health facilities (33·5%), with considerable variation between regions. Based on the most recent data available for each country, 15% of births in 106 (63%) of 169 countries were by CS, whereas 47 (28%) countries showed CS use in less than 10% of births. National CS use varied from 0·6% in South Sudan to 58·1% in the Dominican Republic. Within-country disparities in CS use were also very large: CS use was almost five times more frequent in births in the richest versus the poorest quintiles in low-income and middle-income countries; markedly high CS use was observed among low obstetric risk births, especially among more educated women in, for example, Brazil and China; and CS use was 1·6 times more frequent in private facilities than in public facilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖腹产使用的全球流行病学和差异。
在本系列论文中,我们描述了全球、区域和选定国家剖宫产(CS)使用的频率、趋势、决定因素和不平等。根据来自169个国家(占世界出生人数的98.4%)的数据,我们估计2015年通过CS出生的人数为2970万(21.1%,95%不确定区间为19.9 - 22.4),几乎是2000年通过该方法出生的人数(160万[12.1%,10.9 - 13.3])的两倍。2015年,拉丁美洲和加勒比地区使用CS的频率高达10倍,其中44.3%(41.3 - 47.4%)的新生儿使用CS,而西非和中非地区使用CS的比例为4.1%(3.6% - 4.6%)。全球和区域使用避孕药的增加是由于在卫生设施中分娩的比例增加(占全球增长的66.5%)和卫生设施内使用避孕药的增加(33.5%),区域之间差异很大。根据每个国家可获得的最新数据,169个国家中106个(63%)的新生儿中有15%使用避孕药,而47个(28%)国家的新生儿中使用避孕药的比例不到10%。全国CS使用率从南苏丹的0.6%到多米尼加共和国的58.1%不等。国家内部使用CS的差异也非常大:在低收入和中等收入国家中,最富裕的五分之一人口出生时使用CS的频率几乎是最贫穷的五分之一人口的五倍;在低产科风险分娩中观察到明显高的CS使用,特别是在巴西和中国等受教育程度较高的妇女中;私立医院的CS使用频率是公立医院的1.6倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet
The Lancet 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
148.10
自引率
0.70%
发文量
2220
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Lancet is a world-leading source of clinical, public health, and global health knowledge. It was founded in 1823 by Thomas Wakley and has been an independent, international weekly general medical journal since then. The journal has an Impact Factor of 168.9, ranking first among 167 general and internal medicine journals globally. It also has a Scopus CiteScore of 133·2, ranking it second among 830 general medicine journals. The Lancet's mission is to make science widely available to serve and transform society, positively impacting people's lives. Throughout its history, The Lancet has been dedicated to addressing urgent topics, initiating debate, providing context for scientific research, and influencing decision makers worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Priorities for sickle cell disease global research and implementation. Addressing global gun violence: a Lancet Commission on Global Gun Violence and Health. Changing the culture of blood culture. The time to address the antibiotic pipeline and access crisis is now. Antimicrobial resistance: now is the time to revisit global commitments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1