Reliability and Validity of Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale in Turkish Population.

IF 2.7 4区医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias Pub Date : 2019-02-01 Epub Date: 2018-10-17 DOI:10.1177/1533317518802449

Gizem Ayan, Ceyda Afacan, Burc Cagrı Poyraz, Onur Bilgic, Suna Avci, Hakan Yavuzer, Mehmet Yuruyen, Deniz Suna Erdincler, Burak Ayan, Alper Doventas

{"title":"Reliability and Validity of Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale in Turkish Population.","authors":"Gizem Ayan, Ceyda Afacan, Burc Cagrı Poyraz, Onur Bilgic, Suna Avci, Hakan Yavuzer, Mehmet Yuruyen, Deniz Suna Erdincler, Burak Ayan, Alper Doventas","doi":"10.1177/1533317518802449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim is to validate Turkish version Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS).Methods: One hundred forty patients (>65 years) were included. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition -V was used in all patients. Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale was applied for 2 days. Results were compared with Mini-Mental State Examination; reliability, validity, and statistical values were determined.Results: Time validity was verified. Mini-mental state examination was correlated 45.3% in control and 73% in dementia group. Factor weights varied between 0.44 and 0.81; factor construct was verified as 6-item scoring. When 25 was cutoff point, sensitivity was 92.86% and specificity was 92.86%. Content validity index was found to be 100% by 7 specialists. Cronbach α (0.692) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.987) were determined.Conclusion: Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (Turkish) is validated and verified as reliable. Test could be applied for 5 minutes approximately; results are not affected by educational status, immigrant status, and language used; however, age and gender have significant effect on results.","PeriodicalId":50816,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias","volume":"34 1","pages":"34-40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10852419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317518802449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim is to validate Turkish version Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS).

Methods: One hundred forty patients (>65 years) were included. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition -V was used in all patients. Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale was applied for 2 days. Results were compared with Mini-Mental State Examination; reliability, validity, and statistical values were determined.

Results: Time validity was verified. Mini-mental state examination was correlated 45.3% in control and 73% in dementia group. Factor weights varied between 0.44 and 0.81; factor construct was verified as 6-item scoring. When 25 was cutoff point, sensitivity was 92.86% and specificity was 92.86%. Content validity index was found to be 100% by 7 specialists. Cronbach α (0.692) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.987) were determined.

Conclusion: Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (Turkish) is validated and verified as reliable. Test could be applied for 5 minutes approximately; results are not affected by educational status, immigrant status, and language used; however, age and gender have significant effect on results.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

罗兰德痴呆症通用评估量表在土耳其人群中的可靠性和有效性。

背景：目的是验证土耳其版罗兰老年痴呆症通用评估量表（RUDAS）：目的：验证土耳其版罗兰痴呆症通用评估量表（RUDAS）：方法：纳入 140 名患者（65 岁以上）。所有患者均使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版。对所有患者使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版-V。将结果与迷你精神状态检查进行比较，确定信度、效度和统计值：结果：时间有效性得到验证。迷你精神状态检查的相关性在对照组为 45.3%，在痴呆组为 73%。因子权重介于 0.44 和 0.81 之间；因子结构被验证为 6 项评分。当以 25 为分界点时，灵敏度为 92.86%，特异度为 92.86%。7 位专家认为内容效度指数为 100%。Cronbachα（0.692）和测试-再测可靠性（类内相关=0.987）均已确定：结论：罗兰痴呆症通用评估量表（土耳其语）经过验证，证明是可靠的。测试时间约为 5 分钟；测试结果不受教育状况、移民身份和所用语言的影响；但年龄和性别对测试结果有显著影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： American Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease and other Dementias® (AJADD) is for professionals on the frontlines of Alzheimer''s care, dementia, and clinical depression--especially physicians, nurses, psychiatrists, administrators, and other healthcare specialists who manage patients with dementias and their families. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).