Strengthening hepatitis B and C surveillance in Europe: results from the two global hepatitis policy surveys (2013 and 2014).

Hepatology, medicine and policy Pub Date : 2016-06-30 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s41124-016-0009-5
Jeffrey V Lazarus, Antons Mozalevskis, Kelly Safreed-Harmon, Irina Eramova
{"title":"Strengthening hepatitis B and C surveillance in Europe: results from the two global hepatitis policy surveys (2013 and 2014).","authors":"Jeffrey V Lazarus,&nbsp;Antons Mozalevskis,&nbsp;Kelly Safreed-Harmon,&nbsp;Irina Eramova","doi":"10.1186/s41124-016-0009-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatitis B and C are major public health threats in the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region. Viral hepatitis surveillance shortcomings have resulted in many WHO Member States having insufficient data available to guide decision-making. This study describes surveillance in the region based on a quantitative sub-analysis of findings from the 2013 WHO viral hepatitis policy report and a qualitative analysis of civil society survey responses associated with these findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive statistics were created from information that national government focal points for viral hepatitis in 44 countries had previously reported in response to the WHO survey. Bivariate analysis was performed to compare data from within and outside of the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA). Survey responses from civil society organizations in the countries of the WHO European Region were collated, and a descriptive analysis of the comments on surveillance-related questions was performed to identify key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate for the survey of governments was 83 % among both EU/EEA countries (25/30) and non-EU/EEA countries (19/23). More than 90 % of governments reported having national surveillance systems for the acute forms of hepatitis B and hepatitis C, but less than two-thirds reported surveillance for the chronic forms of both diseases. High proportions of governments reported having central registries for the reporting of deaths (96 %) and liver cancer cases (80 %), while less than half reported regularly conducting viral hepatitis sero-surveys. All responding Member States reported having adequate laboratory capacity nationally to support hepatitis outbreak investigations and other surveillance activities. Target populations for sero-surveys most commonly included people who inject drugs (27 %), the general population (25 %), men who have sex with men (20 %) and pregnant women (20 %). Few statistically significant differences were found between EU/EEA and non-EU/EEA countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study findings indicated a capacity for robust viral hepatitis surveillance across the WHO European Region, with most countries having important surveillance components in place, but notable weaknesses were also identified. There is an urgent need for countries throughout the region to strengthen their surveillance programs in order to maximize the population-level impact of advances in HBV and HCV prevention and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":91692,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology, medicine and policy","volume":"1 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41124-016-0009-5","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology, medicine and policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41124-016-0009-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Hepatitis B and C are major public health threats in the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region. Viral hepatitis surveillance shortcomings have resulted in many WHO Member States having insufficient data available to guide decision-making. This study describes surveillance in the region based on a quantitative sub-analysis of findings from the 2013 WHO viral hepatitis policy report and a qualitative analysis of civil society survey responses associated with these findings.

Methods: Descriptive statistics were created from information that national government focal points for viral hepatitis in 44 countries had previously reported in response to the WHO survey. Bivariate analysis was performed to compare data from within and outside of the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA). Survey responses from civil society organizations in the countries of the WHO European Region were collated, and a descriptive analysis of the comments on surveillance-related questions was performed to identify key themes.

Results: The response rate for the survey of governments was 83 % among both EU/EEA countries (25/30) and non-EU/EEA countries (19/23). More than 90 % of governments reported having national surveillance systems for the acute forms of hepatitis B and hepatitis C, but less than two-thirds reported surveillance for the chronic forms of both diseases. High proportions of governments reported having central registries for the reporting of deaths (96 %) and liver cancer cases (80 %), while less than half reported regularly conducting viral hepatitis sero-surveys. All responding Member States reported having adequate laboratory capacity nationally to support hepatitis outbreak investigations and other surveillance activities. Target populations for sero-surveys most commonly included people who inject drugs (27 %), the general population (25 %), men who have sex with men (20 %) and pregnant women (20 %). Few statistically significant differences were found between EU/EEA and non-EU/EEA countries.

Conclusions: Study findings indicated a capacity for robust viral hepatitis surveillance across the WHO European Region, with most countries having important surveillance components in place, but notable weaknesses were also identified. There is an urgent need for countries throughout the region to strengthen their surveillance programs in order to maximize the population-level impact of advances in HBV and HCV prevention and treatment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强欧洲乙型和丙型肝炎监测:来自两次全球肝炎政策调查(2013年和2014年)的结果。
背景:乙型和丙型肝炎是世界卫生组织(世卫组织)欧洲区域主要的公共卫生威胁。病毒性肝炎监测的不足导致世卫组织许多会员国没有足够的数据来指导决策。本研究基于对2013年世卫组织病毒性肝炎政策报告结果的定量亚分析和对与这些结果相关的民间社会调查答复的定性分析,描述了该地区的监测情况。方法:根据44个国家病毒性肝炎国家政府联络点先前根据世卫组织调查报告的信息创建描述性统计数据。采用双变量分析比较来自欧盟/欧洲经济区(EU/EEA)内外的数据。对世卫组织欧洲区域各国民间社会组织的调查答复进行了整理,并对有关监视问题的评论进行了描述性分析,以确定关键主题。结果:欧盟/欧洲经济区国家(25/30)和非欧盟/欧洲经济区国家(19/23)的政府调查回复率均为83%。90%以上的政府报告拥有针对急性乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎的国家监测系统,但不到三分之二的政府报告了针对这两种疾病慢性形式的监测。很高比例的政府报告设立了死亡(96%)和肝癌病例(80%)报告的中央登记处,而不到一半的政府报告定期进行病毒性肝炎血清调查。所有作出答复的会员国都报告说,它们在本国拥有足够的实验室能力,以支持肝炎疫情调查和其他监测活动。血清调查的目标人群通常包括注射毒品者(27%)、一般人群(25%)、男男性行为者(20%)和孕妇(20%)。在欧盟/欧洲经济区国家和非欧盟/欧洲经济区国家之间几乎没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:研究结果表明,整个世卫组织欧洲区域有能力进行强有力的病毒性肝炎监测,大多数国家都有重要的监测组成部分,但也发现了明显的弱点。本区域各国迫切需要加强其监测规划,以便最大限度地发挥乙型肝炎病毒和丙型肝炎病毒预防和治疗进展对人口水平的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correlates of hepatitis B awareness and disease-specific knowledge among pregnant women in Northern and Central Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Correction to: Hepatology, Medicine and Policy: Articles with DOIs 10.1186/s41124-016-0014-8, 10.1186/s41124-016-0013-9 and 10.1186/s41124-016-0012-x. Strategies for achieving viral hepatitis C micro-elimination in the Netherlands. Erratum: Publisher Correction to Hepatology, Medicine and Policy: Articles with DOIs 10.1186/s41124-017-0024-1, 10.1186/s41124-017-0025-0, 10.1186/s41124-017-0026-z and 10.1186/s41124-017-0027-y. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B and C in Nepal: a systematic review (1973-2017).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1