Comparision of Letrozole with Timed Intercourse Versus Clomiphene Citrate with Intrauterine Insemination in Patients with Unexplained Infertility.
IF 0.2 4区 医学Q4 Medicine生殖医学杂志Pub Date : 2016-09-01
Jorge Rodriguez-Purata, Joseph Lee, Michael Whitehouse, Benjamin Sandler, Alan Copperman, Tanmoy Mukherjee
{"title":"Comparision of Letrozole with Timed Intercourse Versus Clomiphene Citrate with Intrauterine Insemination in Patients with Unexplained Infertility.","authors":"Jorge Rodriguez-Purata, Joseph Lee, Michael Whitehouse, Benjamin Sandler, Alan Copperman, Tanmoy Mukherjee","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate outcomes of patients with unexplained infertility who underwent letrozole (LET)- stimulated controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with timed sexual intercourse (IC) as compared to patients treated with clomiphene citrate (CC) and intrauterine insemination (IUI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A non- randomized, retrospective study where unexplained in- fertility patients (n=7,764). underwent a COS cycle with both LET and timed IC or with CC and IUI from January 2010-June 2014. One group consisted of patients who completed a COS cycle with LET and were instructed to have sexual IC. The other included patients were treated with CC and underwent IUI. Pregnancy rates (PRs) were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical difference was observed in each group's age or serum follicule-stimulating hor- mone levels. A statistical significance in LET versus CC-stimulated groups was observed for mean endome- trial thickness (8.3 ± 1.7 vs. 7.9 ± 1.8 mm) and follicular response (2.0 ± 1.0 vs. 2.3 ± 1.3), respectively. Clinical PRs after timed IC were significantly higher in the LET versus CC-stimulated group (15.0% vs 11.8%). Clinical PRs after timed IUI were also significantly higher in the LET versus CC-stimulated group (12.3% vs. 11.5%). Moreover, clinical PRs in LET with IC were significant- ly higher than CC with IUI (15.0% vs. 11.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unexplained infertility patients who underwent LET stimulation with IC werefound to have better pregnancy out- comes as compared to those who underwent timed IC.or IUI with CC stimulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"61 9-10","pages":"425-430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate outcomes of patients with unexplained infertility who underwent letrozole (LET)- stimulated controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with timed sexual intercourse (IC) as compared to patients treated with clomiphene citrate (CC) and intrauterine insemination (IUI).
Study design: A non- randomized, retrospective study where unexplained in- fertility patients (n=7,764). underwent a COS cycle with both LET and timed IC or with CC and IUI from January 2010-June 2014. One group consisted of patients who completed a COS cycle with LET and were instructed to have sexual IC. The other included patients were treated with CC and underwent IUI. Pregnancy rates (PRs) were compared between groups.
Results: No statistical difference was observed in each group's age or serum follicule-stimulating hor- mone levels. A statistical significance in LET versus CC-stimulated groups was observed for mean endome- trial thickness (8.3 ± 1.7 vs. 7.9 ± 1.8 mm) and follicular response (2.0 ± 1.0 vs. 2.3 ± 1.3), respectively. Clinical PRs after timed IC were significantly higher in the LET versus CC-stimulated group (15.0% vs 11.8%). Clinical PRs after timed IUI were also significantly higher in the LET versus CC-stimulated group (12.3% vs. 11.5%). Moreover, clinical PRs in LET with IC were significant- ly higher than CC with IUI (15.0% vs. 11.5%).
Conclusion: Unexplained infertility patients who underwent LET stimulation with IC werefound to have better pregnancy out- comes as compared to those who underwent timed IC.or IUI with CC stimulation.
目的:评价不明原因不孕症患者接受来曲唑(LET)刺激的控制性卵巢刺激(COS)伴定时性交(IC)与枸橼酸克罗米芬(CC)联合宫内人工授精(IUI)治疗的疗效。研究设计:一项非随机、回顾性研究,纳入原因不明的不孕患者(n=7,764)。从2010年1月至2014年6月,接受了LET和定时IC或CC和IUI的COS周期。一组患者使用LET完成COS周期,并被指示进行性IC。另一组患者接受CC治疗并进行IUI。比较各组妊娠率(pr)。结果:各组年龄及血清促卵泡激素水平差异无统计学意义。LET组与cc刺激组的平均内膜试验厚度(8.3±1.7 vs 7.9±1.8 mm)和卵泡反应(2.0±1.0 vs 2.3±1.3)分别有统计学意义。与cc刺激组相比,LET刺激组定时IC后的临床pr明显更高(15.0% vs 11.8%)。与cc刺激组相比,LET组定时IUI后的临床pr也显著更高(12.3%对11.5%)。此外,LET合并IC的临床pr显著高于CC合并IUI (15.0% vs 11.5%)。结论:原因不明的不孕症患者接受LET刺激与IC相比,接受定时ivf或IUI与CC刺激的患者有更好的妊娠结局。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.