Comparative De Novo Transcriptome Assembly of Notophthalmus viridescens RNA-seq Data using Two Commercial Software Programs.

Jonathan Chacon, Math P Cuajungco
{"title":"Comparative De Novo Transcriptome Assembly of <i>Notophthalmus viridescens</i> RNA-seq Data using Two Commercial Software Programs.","authors":"Jonathan Chacon,&nbsp;Math P Cuajungco","doi":"10.32398/cjhp_20181601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The reduction of cost and ease of using core laboratories or commercial sequencing companies have allowed biomedical and health researchers alike to employ reference-based genomic or transcriptomic sequencing (RNA-seq) projects to expand their work. Non-reference based data analysis, in cases of inexperienced researchers, become more challenging despite the availability of many open source and commercial software programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed de novo assembly of RNA-seq data obtained from a non-model organism (Eastern Newt skin) to compare data output of two commercially available software workflows.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results show that the software packages performed satisfactorily albeit with differences in how the annotated and novel transcripts were identified and listed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, we conclude that the use of commercial software platforms has a clear advantage to that of open source programs because of convenience with data analysis workflows. One caveat is that users need to know the software's basic algorithm and technical approach, in order to determine the precision and validity of the data output. Thus, it is imperative that researchers fully evaluate the software according to their needs to determine their suitability.</p>","PeriodicalId":87431,"journal":{"name":"Californian journal of health promotion","volume":"16 1","pages":"46-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205749/pdf/nihms-993830.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Californian journal of health promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32398/cjhp_20181601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and purpose: The reduction of cost and ease of using core laboratories or commercial sequencing companies have allowed biomedical and health researchers alike to employ reference-based genomic or transcriptomic sequencing (RNA-seq) projects to expand their work. Non-reference based data analysis, in cases of inexperienced researchers, become more challenging despite the availability of many open source and commercial software programs.

Methods: We performed de novo assembly of RNA-seq data obtained from a non-model organism (Eastern Newt skin) to compare data output of two commercially available software workflows.

Results: Our results show that the software packages performed satisfactorily albeit with differences in how the annotated and novel transcripts were identified and listed.

Conclusion: Overall, we conclude that the use of commercial software platforms has a clear advantage to that of open source programs because of convenience with data analysis workflows. One caveat is that users need to know the software's basic algorithm and technical approach, in order to determine the precision and validity of the data output. Thus, it is imperative that researchers fully evaluate the software according to their needs to determine their suitability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用两种商业软件程序比较Notophthalmus病毒RNA-seq数据的从头转录组组装。
背景和目的:由于成本的降低和使用核心实验室或商业测序公司的便利性,生物医学和健康研究人员都可以采用基于参考的基因组或转录组测序(RNA-seq)项目来扩大他们的工作。尽管有许多开源和商业软件程序,但对于缺乏经验的研究人员来说,非参考数据分析变得更具挑战性。方法:我们对从非模式生物(东部蝾螈皮肤)获得的RNA-seq数据进行了从头组装,以比较两种市售软件工作流的数据输出。结果:我们的结果表明,尽管在如何识别和列出注释和新颖转录本方面存在差异,但软件包的表现令人满意。结论:总的来说,我们得出结论,使用商业软件平台比使用开源程序有明显的优势,因为数据分析工作流程更方便。需要注意的是,用户需要知道软件的基本算法和技术方法,以便确定数据输出的精度和有效性。因此,研究人员必须根据自己的需要对软件进行充分的评估,以确定其适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Quality of Life Among Breast Cancer Patients Fitness Assessment Feedback May Lower Intrinsic Motivation for Physical Activity among College Students Factors Associated with Consumer Knowledge of Garlic Health Properties, Garlic Preparation Knowledge and Garlic Intake Effects of High-Sucrose and High-Saturated Fat Diets on Learning Abilities in Old Sprague-Dawley Rats Culturally Relevant Health Education: A Foundation for Building Cultural Competence of Health Professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1