Retention of Stroke Education Provided during Hospitalization: Does Provision of Required Education Increase Stroke Knowledge?

Q1 Medicine Interventional Neurology Pub Date : 2018-10-01 Epub Date: 2018-07-26 DOI:10.1159/000488884
Brenda Johnson, Diane Handler, Victor Urrutia, Anne W Alexandrov
{"title":"Retention of Stroke Education Provided during Hospitalization: Does Provision of Required Education Increase Stroke Knowledge?","authors":"Brenda Johnson, Diane Handler, Victor Urrutia, Anne W Alexandrov","doi":"10.1159/000488884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Provision of stroke education to patients is a Centers for Medicare/Medicaid (CMS) requirement. However, little is known about retention of the educational content.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two pilot studies were conducted: Pilot A delivered CMS-required stroke education during hospitalization in a standardized manner and tested knowledge retention in patients returning to the Stroke Clinic for 1-month follow-up; Pilot B randomized patients to either a control group with standardized education or a test-enhanced learning group (target), with measurement of stroke knowledge retention at hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 198 patients/caregivers participated in Pilot A, with only 25% scoring 100% correct on required stroke education items. The question most commonly answered incorrectly (<i>n</i> = 117; 59%) was \"personal risk factors for stroke,\" and 74 (37%) could not correctly identify stroke signs and symptoms. Pilot B found that significantly more target group patients could identify their personal stroke risk factors (100 vs. 67%; <i>p</i> = 0.04) and the purpose of their secondary prevention medications (87 vs. 40%; <i>p</i> = 0.02) compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While stroke education is required during hospitalization, its ability to produce retention may be poor. We propose study of test-enhanced learning methods through the Targeted Education in Stroke Trial (TEST) to examine the effect of novel teaching methods on patient/caregiver knowledge retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":46280,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6216712/pdf/ine-0007-0471.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000488884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Provision of stroke education to patients is a Centers for Medicare/Medicaid (CMS) requirement. However, little is known about retention of the educational content.

Methods: Two pilot studies were conducted: Pilot A delivered CMS-required stroke education during hospitalization in a standardized manner and tested knowledge retention in patients returning to the Stroke Clinic for 1-month follow-up; Pilot B randomized patients to either a control group with standardized education or a test-enhanced learning group (target), with measurement of stroke knowledge retention at hospital discharge.

Results: A total of 198 patients/caregivers participated in Pilot A, with only 25% scoring 100% correct on required stroke education items. The question most commonly answered incorrectly (n = 117; 59%) was "personal risk factors for stroke," and 74 (37%) could not correctly identify stroke signs and symptoms. Pilot B found that significantly more target group patients could identify their personal stroke risk factors (100 vs. 67%; p = 0.04) and the purpose of their secondary prevention medications (87 vs. 40%; p = 0.02) compared to controls.

Discussion: While stroke education is required during hospitalization, its ability to produce retention may be poor. We propose study of test-enhanced learning methods through the Targeted Education in Stroke Trial (TEST) to examine the effect of novel teaching methods on patient/caregiver knowledge retention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保留住院期间提供的卒中教育:提供必要的教育会增加卒中知识吗?
背景:向患者提供中风教育是美国医疗保险/医疗补助中心(CMS)的要求。然而,人们对教育内容的保留情况知之甚少:方法:进行了两项试点研究:试点 A 在住院期间以标准化方式提供 CMS 要求的卒中教育,并对返回卒中门诊进行 1 个月随访的患者进行知识保留情况测试;试点 B 将患者随机分为接受标准化教育的对照组或测试强化学习组(目标),并在出院时对卒中知识保留情况进行测量:共有 198 名患者/护理人员参加了试点 A,其中只有 25% 的人在脑卒中教育必答题上的正确率达到 100%。最常答错的问题(n = 117;59%)是 "中风的个人危险因素",74 人(37%)不能正确识别中风的体征和症状。试点 B 发现,与对照组相比,目标组患者能识别其个人中风风险因素(100 vs. 67%;p = 0.04)和二级预防用药目的(87 vs. 40%;p = 0.02)的人数明显增多:讨论:虽然住院期间需要进行脑卒中教育,但教育效果可能不佳。我们建议通过 "卒中目标教育试验"(TEST)研究测试增强学习方法,以检验新型教学方法对患者/护理人员知识保留的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neurology
Interventional Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recanalization of Tandem Vertebrobasilar Occlusions with Contralateral Vertebral Occlusion or Hypoplasia via either Direct Passage or the SHERPA Technique. Does the Addition of Non-Approved Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for rtPA Impact Treatment Rates? Findings in Australia, the UK, and the USA. In vitro Remote Aspiration Embolectomy for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Endovascular Reperfusion for Acute Isolated Cervical Carotid Occlusions: The Concept of "Hemodynamic Thrombectomy". An Appraisal of the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1