Physiological breech birth. Evaluation of a training programme for birth professionals.

Q4 Nursing Practising Midwife Pub Date : 2017-02-01
Shawn Walker, Claire Reading, Olivia Silverwood-Cope, Victoria Cochrane
{"title":"Physiological breech birth. Evaluation of a training programme for birth professionals.","authors":"Shawn Walker,&nbsp;Claire Reading,&nbsp;Olivia Silverwood-Cope,&nbsp;Victoria Cochrane","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article evaluates the results of physiological breech birth (PBB) study days provided by breech Birth Network (BBN). An expanded version of this article, with further details including the statistics and additional information about the content of the training, is available on our website. This paper reports an evaluation of the BBN PBB training programme, which has been developed out of consensus research, with highly experienced health professionals. The training was delivered in four National Health Service trust hospitals in the north and south of England throughout the spring and summer of 2016. The evaluation involved pre- and post-training surverys containing a mixture of open-ended and multiple-choice questions, and rating scales. Data were analysed descriptively. The results indicated that the training addressed the concernsof the participants and was rated highly in expected usefulness for practice. Significant improvements in self-reported confidence and objectively assessed knowledge were observed. Participants found discussions and hands-on practice accompanying videos helpful, and reported concerns about lack of support and involvement of obstetric colleagues both before and after the training. The package is an effectively designed and replicable programme for introducing PBB practice to health care professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":35678,"journal":{"name":"Practising Midwife","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practising Midwife","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article evaluates the results of physiological breech birth (PBB) study days provided by breech Birth Network (BBN). An expanded version of this article, with further details including the statistics and additional information about the content of the training, is available on our website. This paper reports an evaluation of the BBN PBB training programme, which has been developed out of consensus research, with highly experienced health professionals. The training was delivered in four National Health Service trust hospitals in the north and south of England throughout the spring and summer of 2016. The evaluation involved pre- and post-training surverys containing a mixture of open-ended and multiple-choice questions, and rating scales. Data were analysed descriptively. The results indicated that the training addressed the concernsof the participants and was rated highly in expected usefulness for practice. Significant improvements in self-reported confidence and objectively assessed knowledge were observed. Participants found discussions and hands-on practice accompanying videos helpful, and reported concerns about lack of support and involvement of obstetric colleagues both before and after the training. The package is an effectively designed and replicable programme for introducing PBB practice to health care professionals.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生理性臀位分娩。对生育专业人员培训方案的评价。
本文评估了臀位分娩网络(BBN)提供的生理臀位分娩(PBB)研究日的结果。本文的扩展版本,包括统计数据和有关培训内容的其他信息,可在我们的网站上获得。本文报告了对BBN PBB培训计划的评估,该计划是由经验丰富的卫生专业人员根据共识研究制定的。该培训于2016年春夏在英格兰北部和南部的四家国家卫生服务信托医院进行。评估包括培训前和培训后的调查,其中包括开放式和多项选择题的混合,以及评分量表。对数据进行描述性分析。结果表明,培训解决了参与者关注的问题,并在实践的预期有用性方面获得了很高的评价。观察到自我报告的信心和客观评估知识的显着改善。参与者发现视频附带的讨论和实践很有帮助,并报告了培训前后产科同事缺乏支持和参与的问题。该一揽子方案设计有效,可复制,旨在向保健专业人员介绍PBB做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Practising Midwife
Practising Midwife Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊最新文献
Weight loss interventions for improving fertility: a synthesis of current evidence. Evaluating the association of female obesity with the risk of live birth following IVF: Implications for clinical practice. Screening for Low Papp-A: Inconsistencies and Incongruities An Ethnographic Study of the Philosophy, Culture and Practices Within an Urban Freestanding Midwifery Unit: Part 2 – Staff Perspectives What are Human Factors and Ergonomics?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1