Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use Among Institutionalized Older Adults at Nursing Homes in Puerto Rico.

Bianca F Nieves-Pérez, Sullynette Guerrero-De Hostos, Mariela I Frontera-Hernández, Iadelisse Cruz González, José Josué Hernández Muñoz
{"title":"Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use Among Institutionalized Older Adults at Nursing Homes in Puerto Rico.","authors":"Bianca F Nieves-Pérez,&nbsp;Sullynette Guerrero-De Hostos,&nbsp;Mariela I Frontera-Hernández,&nbsp;Iadelisse Cruz González,&nbsp;José Josué Hernández Muñoz","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2018.619.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVES:</b> Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs). <b>DESIGN:</b> Cross-sectional study through review of residents' records. <b>SETTING:</b> Three nursing homes of Puerto Rico's metropolitan area. <b>PARTICIPANTS:</b> Nursing home residents. <b>INTERVENTION:</b> Records of residents 65 years of age and older with documented medications and chronic diseases were reviewed. Hospitalized and hospice/palliative care residents were excluded. Beers criteria-2015 and START-STOPP criteria-2014 were applied to identify PIMs and PPOs. Beers criteria versus STOPP criteria findings were compared. <b>MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:</b> Prevalence of PIMs and PPOs in relation to residents' baseline characteristics. <b>RESULTS:</b> One hundred four records were reviewed. Categorical variables were analyzed by Fisher's exact test and chi square test; <i>t</i>-tests established a relationship between variables and the prevalence of PIMs and PPOs. The quantity of PIMs was analyzed through frequency and percentage values. A statistically significant correlation was found between prescribed medications and PIMs detected using Beers criteria (<i>P</i>-value = 0.031) and STOPP modified criteria (<i>P</i>-value = 0.0002). No statistically significant data were obtained from the START criteria. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Beers criteria were more effective identifying PIMs compared with STOPP criteria. The number of prescribed medications correlated directly to the number of identified PIMs. Additional studies where these tools are applied, and clinical pharmacist interventions are performed, should confirm an improved management of nursing home residents' drug therapy in Puerto Rico.</p>","PeriodicalId":45985,"journal":{"name":"CONSULTANT PHARMACIST","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONSULTANT PHARMACIST","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2018.619.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study through review of residents' records. SETTING: Three nursing homes of Puerto Rico's metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: Nursing home residents. INTERVENTION: Records of residents 65 years of age and older with documented medications and chronic diseases were reviewed. Hospitalized and hospice/palliative care residents were excluded. Beers criteria-2015 and START-STOPP criteria-2014 were applied to identify PIMs and PPOs. Beers criteria versus STOPP criteria findings were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prevalence of PIMs and PPOs in relation to residents' baseline characteristics. RESULTS: One hundred four records were reviewed. Categorical variables were analyzed by Fisher's exact test and chi square test; t-tests established a relationship between variables and the prevalence of PIMs and PPOs. The quantity of PIMs was analyzed through frequency and percentage values. A statistically significant correlation was found between prescribed medications and PIMs detected using Beers criteria (P-value = 0.031) and STOPP modified criteria (P-value = 0.0002). No statistically significant data were obtained from the START criteria. CONCLUSION: Beers criteria were more effective identifying PIMs compared with STOPP criteria. The number of prescribed medications correlated directly to the number of identified PIMs. Additional studies where these tools are applied, and clinical pharmacist interventions are performed, should confirm an improved management of nursing home residents' drug therapy in Puerto Rico.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波多黎各养老院的老年人中可能不适当的药物使用。
目的:潜在不适当药物(PIMs)和潜在处方遗漏(PPOs)的患病率。设计:通过回顾居民记录进行横断面研究。周边环境:波多黎各大都会区的三家养老院。参与者:养老院居民。干预措施:回顾了65岁及以上有药物和慢性疾病记录的居民。住院和临终关怀/姑息治疗居民被排除在外。采用Beers标准-2015和START-STOPP标准-2014对PIMs和PPOs进行了识别。比较Beers标准和STOPP标准的结果。主要结果测量:pim和PPOs患病率与居民基线特征的关系。结果:审查了104份记录。分类变量分析采用Fisher精确检验和卡方检验;t检验建立了变量与PIMs和PPOs患病率之间的关系。通过频率值和百分比值分析pim的数量。处方用药与采用Beers标准(p值= 0.031)和STOPP修正标准(p值= 0.0002)检测的pim之间存在统计学显著相关。从START标准中没有获得具有统计学意义的数据。结论:Beers标准比STOPP标准更能有效识别pim。处方药物的数量与确定的pim数量直接相关。应用这些工具并进行临床药师干预的其他研究应证实波多黎各养老院居民药物治疗管理得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CONSULTANT PHARMACIST
CONSULTANT PHARMACIST PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Vision ... The Society"s long-term desire, aspiration, and core purpose. The vision of the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists is optimal medication management and improved health outcomes for all older persons. Mission ... The Society"s strategic position, focus, and reason for being. The American Society of Consultant Pharmacists empowers pharmacists to enhance quality of care for all older persons through the appropriate use of medication and the promotion of healthy aging.
期刊最新文献
Bylines. Identifying Cognitive Impairment in an Older Adult Using Two Different Screening Tools. Statins: The Burglar of Memory? Clinical Pharmacist Intervention to Engage Older Adults in Reducing Use of Alprazolam. Digging Deeper Into the Patient-Driven Payment Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1