The Indonesian general practitioners' perspectives on formal postgraduate training in primary care.

Q1 Medicine Asia Pacific Family Medicine Pub Date : 2018-11-13 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s12930-018-0047-9
Fitriana Murriya Ekawati, Mora Claramita, Wahyudi Istiono, Hari Kusnanto, Adi Heru Sutomo
{"title":"The Indonesian general practitioners' perspectives on formal postgraduate training in primary care.","authors":"Fitriana Murriya Ekawati,&nbsp;Mora Claramita,&nbsp;Wahyudi Istiono,&nbsp;Hari Kusnanto,&nbsp;Adi Heru Sutomo","doi":"10.1186/s12930-018-0047-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To be recognized as a primary care physician (PCP), an Indonesian general practitioner (GP) has to follow a formal postgraduate training in primary care. However, 4 years since the regulation was published, the progress of the training is slow. There is a need to deeply investigate the doctors' perspectives, particularly to explore factors associated with their willingness to follow this training.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to explore the GPs' views and perspectives related to the formal postgraduate training in primary care that may influence their enrolment in PCP program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with a topic guide. The study took place in Yogyakarta from January to December 2016. The participants were GPs practicing in Yogyakarta primary care clinics who were recruited using purposive-maximum variation sample design. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. The data were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen GPs participants were involved in this study. Three major themes were identified, namely unfamiliarity, resistance, and positivism. Almost all the GP participants were unfamiliar with the primary care training program. They were also pessimistic if the training could change the health service in the country while it lacked resources and infrastructures. However, exposure to the training brought positive insights that it could improve the doctors' knowledge and skills in primary care practice.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The government intention to establish PCP training is currently on the right tract. However, information dissemination and more supports in primary care are also essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":39050,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12930-018-0047-9","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0047-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: To be recognized as a primary care physician (PCP), an Indonesian general practitioner (GP) has to follow a formal postgraduate training in primary care. However, 4 years since the regulation was published, the progress of the training is slow. There is a need to deeply investigate the doctors' perspectives, particularly to explore factors associated with their willingness to follow this training.

Aim: This study aims to explore the GPs' views and perspectives related to the formal postgraduate training in primary care that may influence their enrolment in PCP program.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with a topic guide. The study took place in Yogyakarta from January to December 2016. The participants were GPs practicing in Yogyakarta primary care clinics who were recruited using purposive-maximum variation sample design. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. The data were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis approach.

Results: Nineteen GPs participants were involved in this study. Three major themes were identified, namely unfamiliarity, resistance, and positivism. Almost all the GP participants were unfamiliar with the primary care training program. They were also pessimistic if the training could change the health service in the country while it lacked resources and infrastructures. However, exposure to the training brought positive insights that it could improve the doctors' knowledge and skills in primary care practice.

Discussion: The government intention to establish PCP training is currently on the right tract. However, information dissemination and more supports in primary care are also essential.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼全科医生对初级保健正式研究生培训的看法。
背景:要被认可为初级保健医生(PCP),印度尼西亚全科医生(GP)必须接受正规的初级保健研究生培训。然而,条例颁布4年来,培训进展缓慢。有必要深入调查医生的观点,特别是探索与他们愿意接受这种培训有关的因素。目的:本研究旨在探讨全科医生对正规初级保健研究生培训的看法和观点,这些观点和观点可能会影响他们参加PCP项目。方法:采用半结构式访谈,采用主题指南。该研究于2016年1月至12月在日惹进行。参与者是在日惹初级保健诊所执业的全科医生,采用目的最大变异样本设计招募。这些采访都有录音和文字记录。使用解释性现象学分析方法对数据进行分析。结果:19名全科医生参与了本研究。确定了三个主要主题,即不熟悉,抵抗和实证主义。几乎所有的全科医生参与者都不熟悉初级保健培训项目。他们还对培训能否在缺乏资源和基础设施的情况下改变该国的保健服务表示悲观。然而,接触培训带来了积极的见解,即它可以提高医生在初级保健实践中的知识和技能。讨论:目前政府建立PCP培训的意图是正确的。然而,在初级保健方面的信息传播和更多的支持也是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Family Medicine
Asia Pacific Family Medicine Medicine-Family Practice
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parental knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards self-medication for their children: a cross-sectional study from Palestine Polarized Dermoscopy Facilitates Diagnosis and Treatment of Plantar Pseudohirsutism Group-based educational intervention for advance care planning in primary care: a quasi-experimental study in Japan The Food poisoning outbreak caused by diarrhoeal Bacillus Cereus in Tegalkenongo Village, Bantul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia: a retrospective study Sharing experience from Chinese General Practitioners to International colleagues on how to tackle COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1