Identifying Brain Connectivity Using Network-Based Statistics in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Stratified by β-Amyloid Positivity.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias Pub Date : 2019-03-01 Epub Date: 2018-11-29 DOI:10.1177/1533317518813556
Ji Eun Kim, Sung-Woo Kim, Minsuk Choi, Joon-Kyung Seong, Jae-Hong Lee
{"title":"Identifying Brain Connectivity Using Network-Based Statistics in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Stratified by β-Amyloid Positivity.","authors":"Ji Eun Kim, Sung-Woo Kim, Minsuk Choi, Joon-Kyung Seong, Jae-Hong Lee","doi":"10.1177/1533317518813556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify white matter structural networks of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) dichotomized by β amyloid (Aβ) status and compare them using network-based statistics (NBS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients underwent whole-brain diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, detailed neuropsychological test and [<sup>18</sup>F]-Florbetaben amyloid positron emission tomography. We performed the NBS analysis to compare the whole-brain white matter structural networks extracted from diffusion tensor images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixteen participants (Aβ- cognitively normal [CN], n = 35; Aβ- aMCI, n = 42; Aβ+ aMCI, n = 39) were included. There was no subnetwork showing significant difference between Aβ+ aMCI and Aβ- aMCI. However, by comparing each aMCI group with control group, we found that supplementary motor areas were common hub regions. Intriguingly, Aβ+ aMCI showed reduced connectivity mainly in the medial frontal regions, while Aβ- aMCI showed somewhat uniform disruption when compared to CN.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Structural network analysis using network-based approach in aMCI may shed light on further understanding of white matter disruption in the prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":50816,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias","volume":"34 2","pages":"104-111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10852511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317518813556","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to identify white matter structural networks of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) dichotomized by β amyloid (Aβ) status and compare them using network-based statistics (NBS).

Methods: Patients underwent whole-brain diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, detailed neuropsychological test and [18F]-Florbetaben amyloid positron emission tomography. We performed the NBS analysis to compare the whole-brain white matter structural networks extracted from diffusion tensor images.

Results: One hundred sixteen participants (Aβ- cognitively normal [CN], n = 35; Aβ- aMCI, n = 42; Aβ+ aMCI, n = 39) were included. There was no subnetwork showing significant difference between Aβ+ aMCI and Aβ- aMCI. However, by comparing each aMCI group with control group, we found that supplementary motor areas were common hub regions. Intriguingly, Aβ+ aMCI showed reduced connectivity mainly in the medial frontal regions, while Aβ- aMCI showed somewhat uniform disruption when compared to CN.

Conclusion: Structural network analysis using network-based approach in aMCI may shed light on further understanding of white matter disruption in the prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用基于网络的统计数据识别按β-淀粉样蛋白阳性率分层的失忆性轻度认知障碍患者的大脑连通性
研究背景本研究旨在识别根据β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)状态二分的失忆性轻度认知障碍(aMCI)白质结构网络,并使用基于网络的统计学(NBS)对其进行比较:患者接受全脑弥散加权磁共振成像、详细的神经心理学测试和[18F]-氟贝他滨淀粉样蛋白正电子发射断层扫描。我们进行了 NBS 分析,以比较从弥散张量图像中提取的全脑白质结构网络:结果:共纳入 116 名参与者(Aβ- 认知正常[CN],n = 35;Aβ- aMCI,n = 42;Aβ+ aMCI,n = 39)。Aβ+ aMCI 和 Aβ- aMCI 之间没有明显的子网络差异。然而,通过比较每组 aMCI 和对照组,我们发现辅助运动区是共同的枢纽区域。耐人寻味的是,Aβ+ aMCI主要在内侧额叶区域表现出连接性降低,而Aβ- aMCI与CN相比则表现出某种程度的均匀破坏:结论:采用基于网络的方法对 aMCI 进行结构网络分析,有助于进一步了解阿尔茨海默病前驱期白质破坏的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias
American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease and other Dementias® (AJADD) is for professionals on the frontlines of Alzheimer''s care, dementia, and clinical depression--especially physicians, nurses, psychiatrists, administrators, and other healthcare specialists who manage patients with dementias and their families. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
The Psychological Symptoms and Their Relationship to the Quality of Life Among Dementia Patients Caregivers Different Splice Isoforms of Peripheral Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2 mRNA Expressions are Associated With Cognitive Decline in Mild Dementia Due to Alzheimer’s Disease and Reflect Central Neuroinflammation White Light Stimulation at Gamma Frequency to Modify the Aβ42 and tau Proteins in SH-SY5Y Cells Burden of Illness Among Patients with Psychosis due to Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Other Dementias. Task-Evoked Pupillary Response as a Potential Biomarker of Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1