Gender Differences in the Prevalence of Depression among the Working Population of Nepal.

Psychiatry Journal Pub Date : 2018-10-28 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/8354861
Ojaswee Sherchand, Nidesh Sapkota, Rajendra Kumar Chaudhari, Seraj A Khan, Jouslin Kishor Baranwal, Apeksha Niraula, Madhab Lamsal
{"title":"Gender Differences in the Prevalence of Depression among the Working Population of Nepal.","authors":"Ojaswee Sherchand,&nbsp;Nidesh Sapkota,&nbsp;Rajendra Kumar Chaudhari,&nbsp;Seraj A Khan,&nbsp;Jouslin Kishor Baranwal,&nbsp;Apeksha Niraula,&nbsp;Madhab Lamsal","doi":"10.1155/2018/8354861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the prevalence of depression in the working population; to examine if any gender disparity prevails; and to determine the sociodemographic mediators of depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from previous research was retrieved for this study. Only paid workers were selected (n=160). Sociodemographic variables including prevalence of moderate depression were compared between the genders using Chi square test. Significant variables were subject to logistic regression. Validated Nepali version of the Beck Depression Inventory scale (BDI-Ia) was used to determine depressive symptoms with a cutoff score of ≥20 considered as moderate depression.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The overall prevalence of moderate depression was 15%, with higher prevalence among working women compared to men [<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> (df) = 6.7(1), <i>P</i>=0.01], those practicing religions other than Hinduism [<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> (df) = 5.5(1), <i>P</i>=0.01], those educated up to primary school compared to other education criteria [<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> (df) = 9.4(4), <i>P</i>=0.03], those having vitamin D deficiency compared to others [<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> (df) = 8.5(3), <i>P</i>=0.03], and sedentary lifestyle compared to active lifestyle [<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> (df) = 6.7(1), <i>P</i>=0.009]. The OR (95% CI) for moderate depression was significantly higher in women than in men [3.2 (1.1-9.6), <i>P= 0.03</i>] and sedentary lifestyle [2.9(1.1-8.2), <i>P= 0.04</i>] even after adjusting for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Working women have increased odds of depression compared to men. Among various characteristics, sedentary lifestyle was the most important causative factor for depression among women.</p>","PeriodicalId":30537,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/8354861","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8354861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of depression in the working population; to examine if any gender disparity prevails; and to determine the sociodemographic mediators of depression.

Methods: Data from previous research was retrieved for this study. Only paid workers were selected (n=160). Sociodemographic variables including prevalence of moderate depression were compared between the genders using Chi square test. Significant variables were subject to logistic regression. Validated Nepali version of the Beck Depression Inventory scale (BDI-Ia) was used to determine depressive symptoms with a cutoff score of ≥20 considered as moderate depression.

Result: The overall prevalence of moderate depression was 15%, with higher prevalence among working women compared to men [χ 2 (df) = 6.7(1), P=0.01], those practicing religions other than Hinduism [χ 2 (df) = 5.5(1), P=0.01], those educated up to primary school compared to other education criteria [χ 2 (df) = 9.4(4), P=0.03], those having vitamin D deficiency compared to others [χ 2 (df) = 8.5(3), P=0.03], and sedentary lifestyle compared to active lifestyle [χ 2 (df) = 6.7(1), P=0.009]. The OR (95% CI) for moderate depression was significantly higher in women than in men [3.2 (1.1-9.6), P= 0.03] and sedentary lifestyle [2.9(1.1-8.2), P= 0.04] even after adjusting for confounding variables.

Conclusion: Working women have increased odds of depression compared to men. Among various characteristics, sedentary lifestyle was the most important causative factor for depression among women.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔工作人口中抑郁症患病率的性别差异。
目的:了解工作人群中抑郁症的患病率;调查是否存在性别差异;并确定抑郁症的社会人口学中介。方法:本研究采用文献资料。只选择有报酬的工人(n=160)。采用卡方检验比较性别间包括中度抑郁症患病率在内的社会人口学变量。显著变量采用逻辑回归。经验证的尼泊尔版贝克抑郁量表(BDI-Ia)用于确定抑郁症状,临界值≥20视为中度抑郁。结果:中度抑郁症的总体患病率为15%,其中职业女性的患病率高于男性[χ 2 (df) = 6.7(1), P=0.01],信奉印度教以外的宗教的患病率[χ 2 (df) = 5.5(1), P=0.01],小学及以上学历的患病率高于其他教育标准的患病率[χ 2 (df) = 9.4(4), P=0.03],维生素D缺乏症的患病率高于其他人群[χ 2 (df) = 8.5(3), P=0.03],久坐生活方式的患病率高于积极生活方式的患病率[χ 2 (df) = 6.7(1), P=0.009]。女性中度抑郁症的OR (95% CI)显著高于男性[3.2 (1.1-9.6),P= 0.03]和久坐生活方式[2.9(1.1-8.2),P= 0.04],即使在调整了混杂变量后也是如此。结论:与男性相比,职业女性患抑郁症的几率更高。在各种特征中,久坐的生活方式是导致女性抑郁的最重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Self-Applied Acute Stress Scale (EASE) for Healthcare Providers. A Qualitative Exploration of Causes of Depression among Persons Living with HIV Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy in Uganda: Implications for Policy. 30-Month Follow-Up of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) and Cognitive Remediation for People with Severe Mental Illness: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial. Anxiety and Somatic Symptoms in Children and Adolescents Diagnosed with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Comorbid Mental Health Conditions Associated with Increased Risk of Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1