Factors affecting implementation of digital health interventions for people with psychosis or bipolar disorder, and their family and friends: a systematic review.

The lancet. Psychiatry Pub Date : 2019-03-01 Epub Date: 2018-12-03 DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30302-X
Golnar Aref-Adib, Tayla McCloud, Jamie Ross, Puffin O'Hanlon, Victoria Appleton, Sarah Rowe, Elizabeth Murray, Sonia Johnson, Fiona Lobban
{"title":"Factors affecting implementation of digital health interventions for people with psychosis or bipolar disorder, and their family and friends: a systematic review.","authors":"Golnar Aref-Adib, Tayla McCloud, Jamie Ross, Puffin O'Hanlon, Victoria Appleton, Sarah Rowe, Elizabeth Murray, Sonia Johnson, Fiona Lobban","doi":"10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30302-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital health interventions present an important opportunity to improve health care for people with psychosis or bipolar disorder, but despite their potential, integrating and implementing them into clinical settings has been difficult worldwide. This Review aims to identify factors affecting implementation of digital health interventions for people affected by psychosis or bipolar disorder. We searched seven databases and synthesised data from 26 studies using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Attitudes and beliefs about interventions were crucial factors for both staff and service users, with negative attitudes and scepticism resulting in a lack of motivation to engage with interventions or complete them. The complexity of the interventions was a barrier for people with psychiatric symptoms, low premorbid intelligence quotient, or minimal information technology skills. The accessibility and adaptability of interventions were key facilitators, but insufficient resources, finances, and staff time were barriers to implementation. Interventions need to be user friendly and adaptable to the needs and capabilities of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder, and the staff who support their implementation. Service users and staff should cofacilitate the process of developing and implementing the interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":240194,"journal":{"name":"The lancet. Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"257-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The lancet. Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30302-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital health interventions present an important opportunity to improve health care for people with psychosis or bipolar disorder, but despite their potential, integrating and implementing them into clinical settings has been difficult worldwide. This Review aims to identify factors affecting implementation of digital health interventions for people affected by psychosis or bipolar disorder. We searched seven databases and synthesised data from 26 studies using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Attitudes and beliefs about interventions were crucial factors for both staff and service users, with negative attitudes and scepticism resulting in a lack of motivation to engage with interventions or complete them. The complexity of the interventions was a barrier for people with psychiatric symptoms, low premorbid intelligence quotient, or minimal information technology skills. The accessibility and adaptability of interventions were key facilitators, but insufficient resources, finances, and staff time were barriers to implementation. Interventions need to be user friendly and adaptable to the needs and capabilities of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder, and the staff who support their implementation. Service users and staff should cofacilitate the process of developing and implementing the interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响精神病或双相情感障碍患者及其家人和朋友实施数字卫生干预措施的因素:系统综述
数字卫生干预措施为改善精神病或双相情感障碍患者的卫生保健提供了重要机会,但尽管具有潜力,但在全球范围内,将其纳入临床环境并加以实施一直很困难。本综述旨在确定影响精神病或双相情感障碍患者实施数字健康干预措施的因素。我们检索了7个数据库,并使用实施研究统一框架综合了26项研究的数据。对干预措施的态度和信念是工作人员和服务使用者的关键因素,消极的态度和怀疑导致缺乏参与干预措施或完成干预措施的动机。干预措施的复杂性对有精神症状、病前智商低或信息技术技能最低的人来说是一个障碍。干预措施的可及性和适应性是关键的促进因素,但资源、资金和工作人员时间不足是实施的障碍。干预措施必须便于使用,并适应精神病或双相情感障碍患者以及支持实施这些干预措施的工作人员的需求和能力。服务使用者和工作人员应协助制订和执行干预措施的进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
School-based interventions to support mental health in adolescents: what works BESST? Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a brief accessible cognitive behavioural therapy programme for stress in school-aged adolescents (BESST): a cluster randomised controlled trial in the UK. Prevalence of multimorbidity in people with and without severe mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Staging 2·0: refining transdiagnostic clinical staging frameworks to enhance reliability and utility for youth mental health. Standard guidelines on electronic mental health and psychosocial support for humanitarian assistance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1