Optimal duration and predictors of diagnostic utility of patient-activated ambulatory ECG monitoring.

Q2 Medicine Heart Asia Pub Date : 2018-11-24 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1136/heartasia-2018-011061
Eugene S J Tan, Swee-Chong Seow, Pipin Kojodjojo, Devinder Singh, Wee Tiong Yeo, Toon Wei Lim
{"title":"Optimal duration and predictors of diagnostic utility of patient-activated ambulatory ECG monitoring.","authors":"Eugene S J Tan,&nbsp;Swee-Chong Seow,&nbsp;Pipin Kojodjojo,&nbsp;Devinder Singh,&nbsp;Wee Tiong Yeo,&nbsp;Toon Wei Lim","doi":"10.1136/heartasia-2018-011061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We studied the optimal duration of ambulatory event monitors for symptomatic patients and the predictors of detected events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with palpitations or dizziness received a patient-activated handheld event monitor which records 30 s single-lead ECG strips. Patients were monitored in an ambulatory setting for a range of 1-4 weeks and ECG strips interpreted by five independent electrophysiologists. Event pick-up rates and clinical covariates were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 335 consecutive adults (age 50±16 years, 58% female) with palpitations (94%) and dizziness (25%) monitored, 286 patients (85%) reported events, and clinically significant events were detected in 86 (26%) patients. Of these 86 patients, 26% had ≥2 significant events, and 73% had events detected in the first 3 days. No significant events were detected after 12 days. The most common ECG abnormalities detected were premature ventricular ectopy (38%), premature atrial ectopy (37%) and atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (34%). A history of AF (adjusted OR (AOR) 4.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 15.8), previous arrhythmia (AOR 2.8, 95% CI 2.3 to 5.9) and previous abnormal ambulatory monitoring (AOR 3.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 9.4) were associated with detection of clinically significant events. Patients older than 50 years were 82% more likely to have a clinically significant event (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient-activated ambulatory event monitoring for 7 days may be sufficient in the diagnosis of symptomatic patients as significant events first detected beyond 10 days were rare. Patients with a history of AF, arrhythmia or previous abnormal ambulatory monitoring may require even shorter monitoring periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":12858,"journal":{"name":"Heart Asia","volume":"10 2","pages":"e011061"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/heartasia-2018-011061","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartasia-2018-011061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: We studied the optimal duration of ambulatory event monitors for symptomatic patients and the predictors of detected events.

Methods: Patients with palpitations or dizziness received a patient-activated handheld event monitor which records 30 s single-lead ECG strips. Patients were monitored in an ambulatory setting for a range of 1-4 weeks and ECG strips interpreted by five independent electrophysiologists. Event pick-up rates and clinical covariates were analysed.

Results: Of 335 consecutive adults (age 50±16 years, 58% female) with palpitations (94%) and dizziness (25%) monitored, 286 patients (85%) reported events, and clinically significant events were detected in 86 (26%) patients. Of these 86 patients, 26% had ≥2 significant events, and 73% had events detected in the first 3 days. No significant events were detected after 12 days. The most common ECG abnormalities detected were premature ventricular ectopy (38%), premature atrial ectopy (37%) and atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (34%). A history of AF (adjusted OR (AOR) 4.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 15.8), previous arrhythmia (AOR 2.8, 95% CI 2.3 to 5.9) and previous abnormal ambulatory monitoring (AOR 3.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 9.4) were associated with detection of clinically significant events. Patients older than 50 years were 82% more likely to have a clinically significant event (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.6).

Conclusion: Patient-activated ambulatory event monitoring for 7 days may be sufficient in the diagnosis of symptomatic patients as significant events first detected beyond 10 days were rare. Patients with a history of AF, arrhythmia or previous abnormal ambulatory monitoring may require even shorter monitoring periods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者主动动态心电图监测诊断效用的最佳持续时间和预测因素。
目的:研究有症状患者动态事件监测的最佳持续时间和检测到的事件的预测因子。方法:心悸或头晕患者接受患者激活手持式事件监测器,记录30 s单导联心电图条。患者在门诊环境中监测1-4周,心电图条由5名独立的电生理学家解读。分析事件拾取率和临床协变量。结果:在335例连续监测心悸(94%)和头晕(25%)的成年人(年龄50±16岁,58%女性)中,286例(85%)报告了事件,86例(26%)患者检测到有临床意义的事件。在这86例患者中,26%有≥2个显著事件,73%在前3天检测到事件。12天后未发现显著事件。最常见的心电图异常是室性过早异位(38%)、心房过早异位(37%)和心房颤动(AF)/心房扑动(34%)。房颤史(调整OR (AOR) 4.2, 95% CI 1.1 ~ 15.8)、既往心律失常(AOR 2.8, 95% CI 2.3 ~ 5.9)和既往异常动态监测(AOR 3.4, 95% CI 1.0 ~ 9.4)与临床重大事件的检测相关。年龄大于50岁的患者发生临床显著事件的可能性高出82% (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3 ~ 3.6)。结论:患者主动的7天动态事件监测可能足以诊断有症状的患者,因为超过10天首次发现的重大事件很少。有房颤史、心律失常或既往异常动态监测的患者可能需要更短的监测时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Asia
Heart Asia Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications. Statin adherence and persistence on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Taiwan. Anaesthesia use in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies Association of school hours with outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in schoolchildren Clinical consequences of poor adherence to lipid-lowering therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease: can we do better?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1