Reuse of catheters and devices labelled for single use: evidence, recommendations and oversight.

Q2 Medicine Heart Asia Pub Date : 2018-11-09 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1136/heartasia-2018-011033
Thomas C Crawford, Kim A Eagle
{"title":"Reuse of catheters and devices labelled for single use: evidence, recommendations and oversight.","authors":"Thomas C Crawford, Kim A Eagle","doi":"10.1136/heartasia-2018-011033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cardiovascular disease has become the most common cause of death and morbidity throughout the world, not just the affluent societies. In 2015, there were 422 million prevalent cases of cardiovascular disease worldwide, and it accounted for an estimated 30% of deaths.1 2As most people live in low-income and middle-income countries, the burden of cardiovascular disease is the greatest in resource-poor countries. The cardiovascular epidemic has a direct impact on the health of the patients and also on the welfare of the economies in which those patients live and work. Poverty can be both a contributing cause and a consequence of cardiovascular disease. It is in the context of oppressive burden of healthcare spending that the discussion about reusing catheters and devices should be considered.\n\n### Historical context\n\nIn the mid-20th century, most medical devices were made of metal, glass or rubber and were generally reusable. Technological developments in the 1960s and 1970s brought out a wave of new polymers, which could be harnessed and which would eventually transition a multiuse medical industry into a single-use paradigm. Many open surgical procedures were gradually replaced by laparoscopic or endovascular procedures. In the 1980s and 1990s, new concerns regarding transmission of bloodborne pathogens such as hepatitis B and C, and HIV coincided with the explosive development of new technologies. Advances in manufacturing techniques, and expectation of improved product performance and predictability deepened interest in single-use devices (SUDs). The confluence of all these factors led to the evolution and dramatic expansion of the SUD concept. Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) began to submit applications to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asking for approval of their products as SUDs. In some instances, the manufacturers changed the labelling from multiuse to single use only without making significant structural changes to the devices.3 The designation …","PeriodicalId":12858,"journal":{"name":"Heart Asia","volume":"10 2","pages":"e011033"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/heartasia-2018-011033","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartasia-2018-011033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease has become the most common cause of death and morbidity throughout the world, not just the affluent societies. In 2015, there were 422 million prevalent cases of cardiovascular disease worldwide, and it accounted for an estimated 30% of deaths.1 2As most people live in low-income and middle-income countries, the burden of cardiovascular disease is the greatest in resource-poor countries. The cardiovascular epidemic has a direct impact on the health of the patients and also on the welfare of the economies in which those patients live and work. Poverty can be both a contributing cause and a consequence of cardiovascular disease. It is in the context of oppressive burden of healthcare spending that the discussion about reusing catheters and devices should be considered. ### Historical context In the mid-20th century, most medical devices were made of metal, glass or rubber and were generally reusable. Technological developments in the 1960s and 1970s brought out a wave of new polymers, which could be harnessed and which would eventually transition a multiuse medical industry into a single-use paradigm. Many open surgical procedures were gradually replaced by laparoscopic or endovascular procedures. In the 1980s and 1990s, new concerns regarding transmission of bloodborne pathogens such as hepatitis B and C, and HIV coincided with the explosive development of new technologies. Advances in manufacturing techniques, and expectation of improved product performance and predictability deepened interest in single-use devices (SUDs). The confluence of all these factors led to the evolution and dramatic expansion of the SUD concept. Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) began to submit applications to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asking for approval of their products as SUDs. In some instances, the manufacturers changed the labelling from multiuse to single use only without making significant structural changes to the devices.3 The designation …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标记为一次性使用的导管和器械的重复使用:证据、建议和监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Asia
Heart Asia Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications. Statin adherence and persistence on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Taiwan. Anaesthesia use in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies Association of school hours with outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in schoolchildren Clinical consequences of poor adherence to lipid-lowering therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease: can we do better?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1