Do green-blocking glasses enhance the nonvisual effects of white polychromatic light?

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY Journal of Physiological Anthropology Pub Date : 2018-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s40101-018-0189-3
Soomin Lee, Naoshi Kakitsuba, Tetso Katsuura
{"title":"Do green-blocking glasses enhance the nonvisual effects of white polychromatic light?","authors":"Soomin Lee,&nbsp;Naoshi Kakitsuba,&nbsp;Tetso Katsuura","doi":"10.1186/s40101-018-0189-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is well known that light containing the blue component stimulates the intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) and plays a role in melatonin suppression and pupillary constriction. In our previous studies, we verified that simultaneous exposure to blue and green light resulted in less pupillary constriction than blue light exposure. Hence, we hypothesized that the nonvisual effects of polychromatic white light might be increased by blocking the green component. Therefore, we conducted an experiment using optical filters that blocked blue or green component and examined the nonvisual effects of these lights on pupillary constriction and electroencephalogram power spectra.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten healthy young males participated in this study. The participant sat on a chair with his eyes facing an integrating sphere. After 10 min of light adaptation, the participant's left eye was exposed to white pulsed light (1000 lx; pulse width 2.5 ms) every 10 s with a blue-blocking glasses, a green-blocking glasses, or control glasses (no lens), and pupillary constriction was measured. Then, after rest for 10 min, the participant was exposed a continuous white light of 1000 lx with a blue- or green-blocking glasses or control glasses and electroencephalogram was measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pupillary constriction with the blue-blocking glasses was significantly less than that observed with the green-blocking glasses. Furthermore, pupillary constriction under the green-blocking glasses was significantly greater than that observed with the control glasses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A reduction in the green component of light facilitated pupillary constriction. Thus, the effects of polychromatic white light containing blue and green components on ipRGCs are apparently increased by removing the green component.</p>","PeriodicalId":48730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiological Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40101-018-0189-3","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-018-0189-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: It is well known that light containing the blue component stimulates the intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) and plays a role in melatonin suppression and pupillary constriction. In our previous studies, we verified that simultaneous exposure to blue and green light resulted in less pupillary constriction than blue light exposure. Hence, we hypothesized that the nonvisual effects of polychromatic white light might be increased by blocking the green component. Therefore, we conducted an experiment using optical filters that blocked blue or green component and examined the nonvisual effects of these lights on pupillary constriction and electroencephalogram power spectra.

Methods: Ten healthy young males participated in this study. The participant sat on a chair with his eyes facing an integrating sphere. After 10 min of light adaptation, the participant's left eye was exposed to white pulsed light (1000 lx; pulse width 2.5 ms) every 10 s with a blue-blocking glasses, a green-blocking glasses, or control glasses (no lens), and pupillary constriction was measured. Then, after rest for 10 min, the participant was exposed a continuous white light of 1000 lx with a blue- or green-blocking glasses or control glasses and electroencephalogram was measured.

Results: Pupillary constriction with the blue-blocking glasses was significantly less than that observed with the green-blocking glasses. Furthermore, pupillary constriction under the green-blocking glasses was significantly greater than that observed with the control glasses.

Conclusions: A reduction in the green component of light facilitated pupillary constriction. Thus, the effects of polychromatic white light containing blue and green components on ipRGCs are apparently increased by removing the green component.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
防绿眼镜能增强白色多色光的非视觉效果吗?
背景:众所周知,含有蓝色成分的光刺激内在光敏视网膜神经节细胞(ipRGCs),并在褪黑激素抑制和瞳孔收缩中发挥作用。在我们之前的研究中,我们证实了同时暴露在蓝光和绿光下比暴露在蓝光下导致的瞳孔收缩更小。因此,我们假设多色白光的非视觉效果可能会通过阻挡绿色成分而增加。因此,我们进行了一个实验,使用光学滤光片阻挡蓝色或绿色成分,并检查了这些光对瞳孔收缩和脑电图功率谱的非视觉影响。方法:10名健康青年男性参与本研究。参与者坐在椅子上,眼睛对着一个积分球。光适应10分钟后,受试者的左眼暴露在白光脉冲下(1000 lx;脉冲宽度2.5 ms),每隔10 s分别佩戴蓝挡眼镜、绿挡眼镜或对照眼镜(无镜片),并测量瞳孔收缩。然后,在休息10分钟后,参与者戴上阻挡蓝色或绿色的眼镜或对照眼镜,连续暴露在1000 lx的白光下,并测量脑电图。结果:蓝挡镜组瞳孔收缩明显小于绿挡镜组。此外,绿色阻挡眼镜下的瞳孔收缩明显大于对照眼镜。结论:光的绿色成分的减少促进了瞳孔收缩。因此,去除绿色成分后,含有蓝色和绿色成分的多色白光对iprgc的影响明显增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
6.50%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Physiological Anthropology (JPA) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research on the physiological functions of modern mankind, with an emphasis on the physical and bio-cultural effects on human adaptability to the current environment. The objective of JPA is to evaluate physiological adaptations to modern living environments, and to publish research from different scientific fields concerned with environmental impact on human life. Topic areas include, but are not limited to: environmental physiology bio-cultural environment living environment epigenetic adaptation development and growth age and sex differences nutrition and morphology physical fitness and health Journal of Physiological Anthropology is the official journal of the Japan Society of Physiological Anthropology.
期刊最新文献
Effects of observing own/others hand movement in different perspectives on mu rhythm suppression: an EEG study. The impact of hygienic living conditions on the differentiation of male body height at the beginning of the twentieth century in the USSR. Association between thermogenic brown fat and genes under positive natural selection in circumpolar populations. Sustained metabolic dysregulation and the emergence of diabetes: associations between HbA1c and metabolic syndrome components in Tunisian diabetic and nondiabetic groups. Impact of high-altitude hypoxia on Helicobacter pylori-induced gastritis pathological manifestations and inflammatory responses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1