Pulse pressure is more relevant than systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Clujul medical (1957) Pub Date : 2018-10-01 Epub Date: 2018-10-30 DOI:10.15386/cjmed-972
Vlad Alexandru Buda, Dana Mihaela Ciobanu, Gabriela Roman
{"title":"Pulse pressure is more relevant than systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.","authors":"Vlad Alexandru Buda,&nbsp;Dana Mihaela Ciobanu,&nbsp;Gabriela Roman","doi":"10.15386/cjmed-972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The parameters evaluated during 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were reported to be predictors of cardiovascular events. We aimed to investigate mean blood pressure, blood pressure variability and pulse pressure during 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in type 2 diabetes patients and to establish their relationship with the presence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The observational study included type 2 diabetes patients randomly selected and distributed in 2 study groups depending on the presence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: CVD(-), n=90, and CVD(+), n=87. Daytime, nighttime and 24-hour systolic and diastolic blood pressure were monitored and mean blood pressure, blood pressure variability and pulse pressure were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study groups were comparable as age, gender ratio, smoking status, body mass index and abdominal circumference. Diabetes and hypertension duration were significantly higher in the CVD(+) group. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, blood variability, dipper prevalence did not differ between study groups. Pulse pressure was significantly higher in the CVD(+) group compared to CVD(-) group (daytime pulse pressure 56.2±13.1 vs. 50.6±11.3 mmHg, p=0.003; nighttime pulse pressure 56.5±14.2 vs. 50.7±12.4 mmHg, p=0.005; 24-hour pulse pressure 54.7±13.6 vs. 49.0±12.0 mmHg, p=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ambulatory pulse pressure was significantly higher in patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease compared to those without cardiovascular disease, although mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure and blood pressure variability were similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":91233,"journal":{"name":"Clujul medical (1957)","volume":"91 4","pages":"408-413"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15386/cjmed-972","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clujul medical (1957)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background and aims: The parameters evaluated during 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were reported to be predictors of cardiovascular events. We aimed to investigate mean blood pressure, blood pressure variability and pulse pressure during 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in type 2 diabetes patients and to establish their relationship with the presence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Methods: The observational study included type 2 diabetes patients randomly selected and distributed in 2 study groups depending on the presence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: CVD(-), n=90, and CVD(+), n=87. Daytime, nighttime and 24-hour systolic and diastolic blood pressure were monitored and mean blood pressure, blood pressure variability and pulse pressure were calculated.

Results: The study groups were comparable as age, gender ratio, smoking status, body mass index and abdominal circumference. Diabetes and hypertension duration were significantly higher in the CVD(+) group. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, blood variability, dipper prevalence did not differ between study groups. Pulse pressure was significantly higher in the CVD(+) group compared to CVD(-) group (daytime pulse pressure 56.2±13.1 vs. 50.6±11.3 mmHg, p=0.003; nighttime pulse pressure 56.5±14.2 vs. 50.7±12.4 mmHg, p=0.005; 24-hour pulse pressure 54.7±13.6 vs. 49.0±12.0 mmHg, p=0.003).

Conclusions: Ambulatory pulse pressure was significantly higher in patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease compared to those without cardiovascular disease, although mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure and blood pressure variability were similar.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在2型糖尿病和心血管疾病患者中,脉压比收缩压和舒张压更相关。
背景和目的:据报道,在24小时动态血压监测中评估的参数是心血管事件的预测因子。我们旨在研究2型糖尿病患者24小时动态血压监测期间的平均血压、血压变异性和脉压,并建立它们与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(CVD)存在的关系。方法:观察性研究纳入随机选择的2型糖尿病患者,根据是否存在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病分为2个研究组:CVD(-), n=90, CVD(+), n=87。监测白天、夜间和24小时收缩压和舒张压,计算平均血压、血压变异性和脉压。结果:各研究组在年龄、性别比例、吸烟状况、体重指数、腹围等方面具有可比性。CVD(+)组糖尿病和高血压持续时间明显增加。平均收缩压和舒张压,血液变异性,斗患病率在研究组之间没有差异。CVD(+)组的脉压明显高于CVD(-)组(白天脉压56.2±13.1比50.6±11.3 mmHg, p=0.003;夜间脉压56.5±14.2 vs 50.7±12.4 mmHg, p=0.005;24小时脉压54.7±13.6 vs 49.0±12.0 mmHg, p=0.003)。结论:2型糖尿病合并动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者的动态脉压明显高于无心血管疾病患者,尽管平均收缩压和舒张压以及血压变异性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral health status and oral health related quality of life in adolescent workers. Clinical and endoscopic manifestations of gastrointestinal amyloidosis: a case series. Hemodynamic monitoring using thoracic bioimpedance - an optimal solution for the treatment of hypertension. A linguoverted impacted tooth with orocutaneous fistula - a rare case report. Nutritional status and eating disorders among medical students from the Cluj-Napoca University centre.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1