Validation of a Finite Element 50th Percentile THOR Anthropomorphic Test Device in Multiple Sled Test Configurations.

Q2 Medicine Stapp car crash journal Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.4271/2018-22-0012
Kyle P McNamara, Derek A Jones, James P Gaewsky, Jacob B Putnam, Jeffrey T Somers, Ashley A Weaver, Joel D Stitzel
{"title":"Validation of a Finite Element 50th Percentile THOR Anthropomorphic Test Device in Multiple Sled Test Configurations.","authors":"Kyle P McNamara,&nbsp;Derek A Jones,&nbsp;James P Gaewsky,&nbsp;Jacob B Putnam,&nbsp;Jeffrey T Somers,&nbsp;Ashley A Weaver,&nbsp;Joel D Stitzel","doi":"10.4271/2018-22-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computational models of anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) can be used in crash simulations to quantify the injury risks to occupants in both a cost-effective and time-sensitive manner. The purpose of this study was to validate the performance of a 50<sup>th</sup> percentile THOR finite element (FE) model against a physical THOR ATD in 11 unique loading scenarios. Physical tests used for validation were performed on a Horizontal Impact Accelerator (HIA) where the peak sled acceleration ranged from 8-20 G and the time to peak acceleration ranged from 40-110 ms. The directions of sled acceleration relative to the THOR model consisted of -GX (frontal impact), +GY (left-sided lateral impact), and +GZ (downward vertical impact) orientations. Simulation responses were compared to physical tests using the CORrelation and Analysis (CORA) method. Using a weighted method, the average response and standard error by direction was +GY (0.83±0.03), -GX (0.80±0.01), and +GZ (0.76±0.03). Qualitative and quantitative results demonstrated the FE model's kinetics and kinematics were sufficiently validated against its counterpart physical model in the tested loading directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"62 ","pages":"415-442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-22-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Computational models of anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) can be used in crash simulations to quantify the injury risks to occupants in both a cost-effective and time-sensitive manner. The purpose of this study was to validate the performance of a 50th percentile THOR finite element (FE) model against a physical THOR ATD in 11 unique loading scenarios. Physical tests used for validation were performed on a Horizontal Impact Accelerator (HIA) where the peak sled acceleration ranged from 8-20 G and the time to peak acceleration ranged from 40-110 ms. The directions of sled acceleration relative to the THOR model consisted of -GX (frontal impact), +GY (left-sided lateral impact), and +GZ (downward vertical impact) orientations. Simulation responses were compared to physical tests using the CORrelation and Analysis (CORA) method. Using a weighted method, the average response and standard error by direction was +GY (0.83±0.03), -GX (0.80±0.01), and +GZ (0.76±0.03). Qualitative and quantitative results demonstrated the FE model's kinetics and kinematics were sufficiently validated against its counterpart physical model in the tested loading directions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有限元50百分位THOR拟人化测试装置在多台车测试配置中的验证。
拟人测试装置(ATDs)的计算模型可以用于碰撞模拟,以经济有效和时间敏感的方式量化乘员的伤害风险。本研究的目的是验证第50百分位THOR有限元(FE)模型与物理THOR ATD在11种不同载荷情况下的性能。用于验证的物理测试是在水平冲击加速器(HIA)上进行的,其中峰值滑橇加速度范围为8-20 G,达到峰值加速度的时间范围为40-110 ms。相对于THOR模型,滑橇加速度方向为-GX(正面撞击)、+GY(左侧侧向撞击)和+GZ(垂直向下撞击)方向。使用相关分析(CORA)方法将模拟响应与物理测试进行比较。采用加权法,各方向的平均响应和标准误差分别为+GY(0.83±0.03)、-GX(0.80±0.01)和+GZ(0.76±0.03)。定性和定量结果表明,在测试的加载方向上,有限元模型的动力学和运动学与对应的物理模型得到了充分的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stapp car crash journal
Stapp car crash journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Child Anthropometries in Relation to Modern Vehicle Seat and Booster Dimensions. Isolated Rib Response and Fracture Prediction for Young Mid-Size Male, Enabled by Population Specific Material Models and Rib Cross-Sectional Geometry. Effects of head restraint (HR) interference on child restraint system (CRS) performance in frontal and far-side impacts. Effect of A-Pillar Blind Spots on a Driver's Pedestrian Visibility during Vehicle Turns at an Intersection. Standardized Assessment of Gravity Settling Human Body Models for Virtual Testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1