Analysis of the Frequency and Mechanism of Injury to Warfighters in the Under-body Blast Environment.

Q2 Medicine Stapp car crash journal Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.4271/2018-22-0014
Kerry Danelson, Laura Watkins, Jonathan Hendricks, Patricia Frounfelker, Karen Pizzolato-Heine, Ray Valentine, Kathryn Loftis
{"title":"Analysis of the Frequency and Mechanism of Injury to Warfighters in the Under-body Blast Environment.","authors":"Kerry Danelson,&nbsp;Laura Watkins,&nbsp;Jonathan Hendricks,&nbsp;Patricia Frounfelker,&nbsp;Karen Pizzolato-Heine,&nbsp;Ray Valentine,&nbsp;Kathryn Loftis","doi":"10.4271/2018-22-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom, improvised explosive devices were used strategically and with increasing frequency. To effectively design countermeasures for this environment, the Department of Defense identified the need for an under-body blast-specific Warrior Injury Assessment Manikin (WIAMan). To help with this design, information on Warfighter injuries in mounted under-body blast attacks was obtained from the Joint Trauma Analysis and Prevention of Injury in Combat program through their Request for Information interface. The events selected were evaluated by Department of the Army personnel to confirm they were representative of the loading environment expected for the WIAMan. A military case review was conducted for all AIS 2+ fractures with supporting radiology. In Warfighters whose injuries were reviewed, 79% had a foot, ankle or leg AIS 2+ fracture. Distal tibia, distal fibula, and calcaneus fractures were the most prevalent. The most common injury mechanisms were bending with probable vehicle contact (leg) and compression (foot). The most severe injuries sustained by Warfighters were to the pelvis, lumbar spine, and thoracic spine. These injuries were attributed to a compressive load from the seat pan that directly loaded the pelvis or created flexion in the lumbar spine. Rare types of injuries included severe abdominal organ injury, severe brain injury, and cervical spine injury. These typically occurred in conjunction with other fractures. Mitigating the frequently observed skeletal injuries using the WIAMan would have substantial long-term benefits for Warfighters.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"62 ","pages":"489-513"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-22-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

During Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom, improvised explosive devices were used strategically and with increasing frequency. To effectively design countermeasures for this environment, the Department of Defense identified the need for an under-body blast-specific Warrior Injury Assessment Manikin (WIAMan). To help with this design, information on Warfighter injuries in mounted under-body blast attacks was obtained from the Joint Trauma Analysis and Prevention of Injury in Combat program through their Request for Information interface. The events selected were evaluated by Department of the Army personnel to confirm they were representative of the loading environment expected for the WIAMan. A military case review was conducted for all AIS 2+ fractures with supporting radiology. In Warfighters whose injuries were reviewed, 79% had a foot, ankle or leg AIS 2+ fracture. Distal tibia, distal fibula, and calcaneus fractures were the most prevalent. The most common injury mechanisms were bending with probable vehicle contact (leg) and compression (foot). The most severe injuries sustained by Warfighters were to the pelvis, lumbar spine, and thoracic spine. These injuries were attributed to a compressive load from the seat pan that directly loaded the pelvis or created flexion in the lumbar spine. Rare types of injuries included severe abdominal organ injury, severe brain injury, and cervical spine injury. These typically occurred in conjunction with other fractures. Mitigating the frequently observed skeletal injuries using the WIAMan would have substantial long-term benefits for Warfighters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体下爆炸环境下作战人员损伤频率及机理分析。
在伊拉克自由行动和持久自由行动期间,简易爆炸装置被战略性地使用,而且越来越频繁。为了有效地设计针对这种环境的对策,国防部确定了对身下爆炸特定战士伤害评估模型(WIAMan)的需求。为了帮助实现这一设计,通过信息请求接口,从联合创伤分析和预防作战损伤项目中获得了战士在安装在身体下的爆炸攻击中受伤的信息。选定的事件由陆军部人员进行评估,以确认它们代表了WIAMan预期的装载环境。对所有AIS 2+型骨折进行了军事病例回顾,并进行了影像学支持。在接受调查的士兵中,79%的人有足部、踝关节或腿部AIS 2+骨折。胫骨远端、腓骨远端和跟骨骨折最为常见。最常见的损伤机制是弯曲和可能的车辆接触(腿)和压缩(脚)。战士们最严重的损伤是骨盆、腰椎和胸椎。这些损伤是由于来自坐垫的压缩载荷直接负荷了骨盆或造成腰椎屈曲。罕见的损伤类型包括严重的腹部器官损伤、严重的脑损伤和颈椎损伤。这些骨折通常与其他骨折同时发生。使用WIAMan减轻经常观察到的骨骼损伤将为作战人员带来实质性的长期利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stapp car crash journal
Stapp car crash journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Child Anthropometries in Relation to Modern Vehicle Seat and Booster Dimensions. Isolated Rib Response and Fracture Prediction for Young Mid-Size Male, Enabled by Population Specific Material Models and Rib Cross-Sectional Geometry. Effects of head restraint (HR) interference on child restraint system (CRS) performance in frontal and far-side impacts. Effect of A-Pillar Blind Spots on a Driver's Pedestrian Visibility during Vehicle Turns at an Intersection. Standardized Assessment of Gravity Settling Human Body Models for Virtual Testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1