Higher-order accurate space-time schemes for computational astrophysics-Part I: finite volume methods.

Dinshaw S Balsara
{"title":"Higher-order accurate space-time schemes for computational astrophysics-Part I: finite volume methods.","authors":"Dinshaw S Balsara","doi":"10.1007/s41115-017-0002-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As computational astrophysics comes under pressure to become a precision science, there is an increasing need to move to high accuracy schemes for computational astrophysics. The algorithmic needs of computational astrophysics are indeed very special. The methods need to be robust and preserve the positivity of density and pressure. Relativistic flows should remain sub-luminal. These requirements place additional pressures on a computational astrophysics code, which are usually not felt by a traditional fluid dynamics code. Hence the need for a specialized review. The focus here is on weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) schemes, discontinuous Galerkin (DG) schemes and PNPM schemes. WENO schemes are higher order extensions of traditional second order finite volume schemes. At third order, they are most similar to piecewise parabolic method schemes, which are also included. DG schemes evolve all the moments of the solution, with the result that they are more accurate than WENO schemes. PNPM schemes occupy a compromise position between WENO and DG schemes. They evolve an Nth order spatial polynomial, while reconstructing higher order terms up to Mth order. As a result, the timestep can be larger. Time-dependent astrophysical codes need to be accurate in space and time with the result that the spatial and temporal accuracies must be matched. This is realized with the help of strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta schemes and ADER (Arbitrary DERivative in space and time) schemes, both of which are also described. The emphasis of this review is on computer-implementable ideas, not necessarily on the underlying theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":74085,"journal":{"name":"Living reviews in computational astrophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41115-017-0002-8","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Living reviews in computational astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41115-017-0002-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As computational astrophysics comes under pressure to become a precision science, there is an increasing need to move to high accuracy schemes for computational astrophysics. The algorithmic needs of computational astrophysics are indeed very special. The methods need to be robust and preserve the positivity of density and pressure. Relativistic flows should remain sub-luminal. These requirements place additional pressures on a computational astrophysics code, which are usually not felt by a traditional fluid dynamics code. Hence the need for a specialized review. The focus here is on weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) schemes, discontinuous Galerkin (DG) schemes and PNPM schemes. WENO schemes are higher order extensions of traditional second order finite volume schemes. At third order, they are most similar to piecewise parabolic method schemes, which are also included. DG schemes evolve all the moments of the solution, with the result that they are more accurate than WENO schemes. PNPM schemes occupy a compromise position between WENO and DG schemes. They evolve an Nth order spatial polynomial, while reconstructing higher order terms up to Mth order. As a result, the timestep can be larger. Time-dependent astrophysical codes need to be accurate in space and time with the result that the spatial and temporal accuracies must be matched. This is realized with the help of strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta schemes and ADER (Arbitrary DERivative in space and time) schemes, both of which are also described. The emphasis of this review is on computer-implementable ideas, not necessarily on the underlying theory.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算天体物理学的高阶精确时空方案-第一部分:有限体积方法。
随着计算天体物理学面临着成为一门精确科学的压力,越来越需要向高精度方案转移计算天体物理学。计算天体物理学的算法需求确实非常特殊。该方法需要具有鲁棒性,并保持密度和压力的正性。相对论性流应该保持亚光速。这些要求给计算天体物理学代码带来了额外的压力,而传统的流体动力学代码通常感受不到这种压力。因此需要进行专门的审查。这里的重点是加权本质非振荡(WENO)格式,不连续Galerkin (DG)格式和PNPM格式。WENO格式是传统二阶有限体积格式的高阶扩展。在三阶,它们最类似于分段抛物法方案,这也包括在内。DG方案对解的所有矩进行演化,结果表明它们比WENO方案更精确。PNPM方案介于WENO和DG方案之间。它们演化出一个n阶空间多项式,同时重构高阶项直至m阶。因此,时间步长可以更大。依赖于时间的天体物理代码需要在空间和时间上精确,其结果是空间和时间的精度必须相匹配。这是借助强稳定保持龙格-库塔格式和ADER(空间和时间的任意导数)格式实现的,并对这两种格式进行了描述。本综述的重点是计算机可实现的想法,而不一定是基础理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Turbulence modelling in neutron star merger simulations Signatures of convection in the atmospheres of cool evolved stars Computational approaches to modeling dynamos in galaxies. Computational methods for collisional stellar systems Neutrino transport in general relativistic neutron star merger simulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1