Intravenous Acetaminophen For the Management of Pain During Vaso-occlusive Crises in Pediatric Patients.

Q1 Medicine P and T Pub Date : 2019-01-01
Paula Baichoo, Arsenia Asuncion, Gladys El-Chaar
{"title":"Intravenous Acetaminophen For the Management of Pain During Vaso-occlusive Crises in Pediatric Patients.","authors":"Paula Baichoo,&nbsp;Arsenia Asuncion,&nbsp;Gladys El-Chaar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with sickle cell disease experience vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) that requires opioid pharmacotherapy. Multimodal analgesic therapy may reduce pain and opioid-induced adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective was to examine the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen in children presenting with pain from VOC. Secondary objectives were to document the safety and opioid-sparing effects of IV acetaminophen during VOC in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Children's Medical Center, NYU-Winthrop Hospital.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective study had two groups of patients, those who received opioids alone (group O) and those who received acetaminophen with opioids (group OA). Children two to 19 years of age who were admitted to the children's medical center for VOC were eligible for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>A reduction in pain by at least 1 out of 10. With every analgesic dose, we documented pain scales and pain scores before and after each dose, the number of doses administered per day, and mg/kg/day. Data were analyzed using the mixed effect model. All opioids administered to patients were converted to morphine equivalents. We documented length of stay and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We had a total of 46 children: 28 in group O and 18 in group OA. Acetaminophen reduced the pain from VOC by 2.3/10. There were trends in different assessments of opioid-sparing effects, in reducing opioid dosage (-0.5 mg/kg morphine equivalent; <i>P</i> = 0.45), reducing overall morphine equivalent doses (-18.5 mg; <i>P</i> = 0.066), and opioid-related adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to demonstrate the effectiveness of IV acetaminophen in treating VOC pain in children, supporting multimodal analgesic therapy in this setting. Opioid-sparing effects were also encouraging.</p>","PeriodicalId":38773,"journal":{"name":"P and T","volume":"44 1","pages":"5-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6336200/pdf/ptj4401005.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"P and T","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children with sickle cell disease experience vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) that requires opioid pharmacotherapy. Multimodal analgesic therapy may reduce pain and opioid-induced adverse effects.

Objective: The primary objective was to examine the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen in children presenting with pain from VOC. Secondary objectives were to document the safety and opioid-sparing effects of IV acetaminophen during VOC in pediatric patients.

Setting: Children's Medical Center, NYU-Winthrop Hospital.

Method: This retrospective study had two groups of patients, those who received opioids alone (group O) and those who received acetaminophen with opioids (group OA). Children two to 19 years of age who were admitted to the children's medical center for VOC were eligible for inclusion.

Main outcome measure: A reduction in pain by at least 1 out of 10. With every analgesic dose, we documented pain scales and pain scores before and after each dose, the number of doses administered per day, and mg/kg/day. Data were analyzed using the mixed effect model. All opioids administered to patients were converted to morphine equivalents. We documented length of stay and adverse events.

Results: We had a total of 46 children: 28 in group O and 18 in group OA. Acetaminophen reduced the pain from VOC by 2.3/10. There were trends in different assessments of opioid-sparing effects, in reducing opioid dosage (-0.5 mg/kg morphine equivalent; P = 0.45), reducing overall morphine equivalent doses (-18.5 mg; P = 0.066), and opioid-related adverse effects.

Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate the effectiveness of IV acetaminophen in treating VOC pain in children, supporting multimodal analgesic therapy in this setting. Opioid-sparing effects were also encouraging.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚治疗小儿血管闭塞危象期疼痛。
背景:患有镰状细胞病的儿童经历血管闭塞危象(VOC),需要阿片类药物治疗。多模式镇痛治疗可减轻疼痛和阿片类药物引起的不良反应。目的:主要目的是检查静脉注射(IV)对乙酰氨基酚对VOC引起疼痛的儿童的有效性。次要目的是记录对乙酰氨基酚在儿科患者VOC期间的安全性和阿片类药物节约效果。地点:纽约大学温斯洛普医院儿童医疗中心。方法:回顾性研究两组患者,分别为单纯阿片类药物治疗组(O组)和对乙酰氨基酚联合阿片类药物治疗组(OA组)。在儿童医疗中心接受VOC治疗的2至19岁儿童符合纳入条件。主要结果测量:疼痛减轻至少1 / 10。在每次给药时,我们记录了每次给药前后的疼痛量表和疼痛评分、每天给药的剂量和mg/kg/天。数据采用混合效应模型进行分析。给患者的所有阿片类药物都转化为吗啡等效物。我们记录了住院时间和不良事件。结果:本组共46例患儿,其中O组28例,OA组18例。对乙酰氨基酚使VOC引起的疼痛减少了2.3/10。阿片类药物节约效应的不同评估有不同的趋势,减少阿片类药物剂量(-0.5 mg/kg吗啡当量;P = 0.45),减少吗啡总当量剂量(-18.5 mg;P = 0.066),阿片类药物相关不良反应。结论:这是第一个证明IV对乙酰氨基酚治疗儿童VOC疼痛有效性的研究,支持在这种情况下的多模式镇痛治疗。阿片类药物节约效应也令人鼓舞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
P and T
P and T Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Better. American Society of Clinical Oncology Is Ciprofloxacin in Combination With Beta-lactam Antibiotics a Recipe for Thrombocytosis?: A Case Report of Thrombocytosis in a Patient Receiving Ciprofloxacin and Ceftriaxone. Outcomes of Inpatient Administration of Restricted Antineoplastic Medications at a Large Academic Medical Institution. PerserisTM: A New and Long-Acting, Atypical Antipsychotic Drug-Delivery System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1