Helen R. Fisher PhD , Corinne A. Keet MD, PhD , Gideon Lack MB, BCh, FRCPCH , George du Toit MB, BCh, FRCPCH
{"title":"Preventing Peanut Allergy: Where Are We Now?","authors":"Helen R. Fisher PhD , Corinne A. Keet MD, PhD , Gideon Lack MB, BCh, FRCPCH , George du Toit MB, BCh, FRCPCH","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2018.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Peanut allergy<span><span> affects 1% to 3% of the Western world, usually begins in early childhood, is rarely outgrown, and has no currently approved treatment. The identification and application of prevention strategies is therefore essential. In 2015, the Learning Early About Peanuts study findings found that early consumption of peanut protein was effective in preventing peanut allergy in high-risk children as compared with peanut avoidance. These findings resulted in changes to allergy prevention guidelines and policy across the world. There are country-specific variations to guidelines, but, within these variations, feeding peanut to children in infancy is a common theme. There are numerous logistical challenges surrounding the implementation of contemporary guidelines at a population level. In the United States, guidelines advise according to risk level with prescreening recommended for high-risk children (mod/severe </span>eczema, egg allergy). Even though high-risk children represent the minority of the childhood population, there are still significant challenges associated with identifying and screening such infants. The need for conducting allergy testing before first giving peanut protein to high-risk infants is debated; although adopting this approach promotes safety, it is financially and logistically challenging. </span></span>Clinical trials that explore the real-life application of these guidelines are needed as is an assessment of guidelines (Australia, for example) that do not adopt the approach of screening.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 367-373"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jaip.2018.11.005","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219818307281","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Abstract
Peanut allergy affects 1% to 3% of the Western world, usually begins in early childhood, is rarely outgrown, and has no currently approved treatment. The identification and application of prevention strategies is therefore essential. In 2015, the Learning Early About Peanuts study findings found that early consumption of peanut protein was effective in preventing peanut allergy in high-risk children as compared with peanut avoidance. These findings resulted in changes to allergy prevention guidelines and policy across the world. There are country-specific variations to guidelines, but, within these variations, feeding peanut to children in infancy is a common theme. There are numerous logistical challenges surrounding the implementation of contemporary guidelines at a population level. In the United States, guidelines advise according to risk level with prescreening recommended for high-risk children (mod/severe eczema, egg allergy). Even though high-risk children represent the minority of the childhood population, there are still significant challenges associated with identifying and screening such infants. The need for conducting allergy testing before first giving peanut protein to high-risk infants is debated; although adopting this approach promotes safety, it is financially and logistically challenging. Clinical trials that explore the real-life application of these guidelines are needed as is an assessment of guidelines (Australia, for example) that do not adopt the approach of screening.
期刊介绍:
JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases.
This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders.
The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.