Casual effect of methotrexate+etanercept/infliximab on survival of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pragmatic and Observational Research Pub Date : 2019-04-18 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2147/POR.S194408
Saeed Akhlaghi, Maryam Sahebari, Mahmoud Mahmoodi, Mehdi Yaseri, Mohammad Ali Mansournia, Hojjat Zeraati
{"title":"Casual effect of methotrexate+etanercept/infliximab on survival of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.","authors":"Saeed Akhlaghi,&nbsp;Maryam Sahebari,&nbsp;Mahmoud Mahmoodi,&nbsp;Mehdi Yaseri,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Mansournia,&nbsp;Hojjat Zeraati","doi":"10.2147/POR.S194408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and objectives:</b> Following the discovery of new drugs, physicians and pharmaceutical companies have become interested in examining patients' mortality and morbidity rates. In this respect, the effects of methotrexate (MTX)+etanercept/infliximab (ETA/INF) therapy on the survival of rheumatoid arthritis patients (RA) were evaluated in this study using marginal structural piecewise constant baseline hazard model. <b>Patients and methods:</b> According to the standard protocol, MTX is considered as the first-line treatment for RA patients. If there is no adequate response to MTX, biologic drugs will be added. To compare the survival rates of RA patients in MTX- and MTX+ETA/INF-treated groups, the piecewise constant baseline hazard model was fitted. Then, due to the existence of the time-dependent confounder (VAS) which was affected by previous treatment, the weight for each person-time was calculated via the inverse probability treatment weighting method. These weights were then used by marginal structural piecewise constant baseline hazard model. Finally, these models were compared. <b>Results:</b> The median (IQR) of the follow-up period in patients receiving MTX+ETN/INF and MTX was 11 (15.25) and 11 (31), respectively, and the 8-year survival rate was reported by 70% versus 68%, respectively. First, the piece-wise constant baseline hazard model was fitted. Fitting the given model showed that MTX+ETA/INF had a significant effect on patients' survival (HR=0.789, 95% CI [0.634, 0.983]). Second, marginal structural piecewise constant baseline hazard model was fitted. But, the results of this model revealed that MTX+ETA/INF did not have a significant impact on patients' survival (HR=0.968, 95% CI [0.860, 1.090]). <b>Conclusion:</b> Adjusting the pain score over time as a time-dependent confounder via marginal structural piecewise constant baseline hazard model, it has been demonstrated that MTX+ETA/INF does not have a significant effect on patients' survival rates. Therefore, a significant difference can be found between survival rates of these groups using longitudinal studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/POR.S194408","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S194408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and objectives: Following the discovery of new drugs, physicians and pharmaceutical companies have become interested in examining patients' mortality and morbidity rates. In this respect, the effects of methotrexate (MTX)+etanercept/infliximab (ETA/INF) therapy on the survival of rheumatoid arthritis patients (RA) were evaluated in this study using marginal structural piecewise constant baseline hazard model. Patients and methods: According to the standard protocol, MTX is considered as the first-line treatment for RA patients. If there is no adequate response to MTX, biologic drugs will be added. To compare the survival rates of RA patients in MTX- and MTX+ETA/INF-treated groups, the piecewise constant baseline hazard model was fitted. Then, due to the existence of the time-dependent confounder (VAS) which was affected by previous treatment, the weight for each person-time was calculated via the inverse probability treatment weighting method. These weights were then used by marginal structural piecewise constant baseline hazard model. Finally, these models were compared. Results: The median (IQR) of the follow-up period in patients receiving MTX+ETN/INF and MTX was 11 (15.25) and 11 (31), respectively, and the 8-year survival rate was reported by 70% versus 68%, respectively. First, the piece-wise constant baseline hazard model was fitted. Fitting the given model showed that MTX+ETA/INF had a significant effect on patients' survival (HR=0.789, 95% CI [0.634, 0.983]). Second, marginal structural piecewise constant baseline hazard model was fitted. But, the results of this model revealed that MTX+ETA/INF did not have a significant impact on patients' survival (HR=0.968, 95% CI [0.860, 1.090]). Conclusion: Adjusting the pain score over time as a time-dependent confounder via marginal structural piecewise constant baseline hazard model, it has been demonstrated that MTX+ETA/INF does not have a significant effect on patients' survival rates. Therefore, a significant difference can be found between survival rates of these groups using longitudinal studies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲氨蝶呤+依那西普/英夫利昔单抗对类风湿关节炎患者生存的随机影响。
背景和目的:随着新药的发现,医生和制药公司对检查病人的死亡率和发病率产生了兴趣。在这方面,本研究采用边际结构分段恒定基线风险模型评估甲氨蝶呤(MTX)+依那西普/英夫利昔单抗(ETA/INF)治疗对类风湿关节炎患者(RA)生存的影响。患者和方法:根据标准方案,MTX被认为是RA患者的一线治疗。如果对甲氨蝶呤没有足够的反应,将添加生物药物。为了比较MTX治疗组和MTX+ETA/ inf治疗组RA患者的生存率,拟合分段恒定基线风险模型。然后,由于存在受既往治疗影响的时间相关混杂因素(VAS),采用逆概率治疗加权法计算每个人-时间的权重。然后将这些权重用于边际结构分段常数基线风险模型。最后,对这些模型进行比较。结果:MTX+ETN/INF和MTX患者随访期的中位(IQR)分别为11(15.25)和11(31),8年生存率分别为70%和68%。首先,拟合分段不变基线风险模型。拟合模型显示,MTX+ETA/INF对患者生存有显著影响(HR=0.789, 95% CI[0.634, 0.983])。其次,拟合了边际结构分段常数基线风险模型。但该模型结果显示,MTX+ETA/INF对患者生存无显著影响(HR=0.968, 95% CI[0.860, 1.090])。结论:通过边际结构分段恒定基线风险模型调整疼痛评分作为时间相关混杂因素,已经证明MTX+ETA/INF对患者生存率没有显著影响。因此,使用纵向研究可以发现这些组的存活率之间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
Pragmatic and Observational Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
UK Electronic Healthcare Records for Research: A Scientometric Analysis of Respiratory, Cardiovascular, and COVID-19 Publications. A Real-World Study on the Short-Term Efficacy of Amlodipine in Treating Hypertension Among Inpatients. Therapeutic Advances in Obesity: How Real-World Evidence Impacts Affordability Beyond Standard of Care. Quality of Life in Patients Affected by Facial Basal Cell Carcinoma: Prospective Longitudinal Pilot Study and Validation of Skin Cancer Index in Lithuanian Language. Advanced Multi-Layer Watertight Closure versus Conventional Closure in Total Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1