Long-Term Effects of Randomization to a Weight Loss Intervention in Older Adults: A Pilot Study.

Q3 Medicine Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-03-08 DOI:10.1080/21551197.2019.1572570
Denise K Houston, Michael E Miller, Dalane W Kitzman, W Jack Rejeski, Stephen P Messier, Mary F Lyles, Stephen B Kritchevsky, Barbara J Nicklas
{"title":"Long-Term Effects of Randomization to a Weight Loss Intervention in Older Adults: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Denise K Houston,&nbsp;Michael E Miller,&nbsp;Dalane W Kitzman,&nbsp;W Jack Rejeski,&nbsp;Stephen P Messier,&nbsp;Mary F Lyles,&nbsp;Stephen B Kritchevsky,&nbsp;Barbara J Nicklas","doi":"10.1080/21551197.2019.1572570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) show intentional weight loss improves body composition and physical function in older adults; however, the long-term benefits (and risks) are unknown. We conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility of recalling prior RCT participants to examine the long-term effects of intentional weight loss on body composition and physical function. A weighted, random sample of 60 older adults who were randomized to caloric restriction plus exercise (CR + EX) or exercise (EX) only in 5 prior RCTs (mean age at randomization, 67.3 years; 69% women, 80% white) were invited to participate. Follow-up was obtained on 89% (42 clinic visits, 10 phone interviews, 1 death) an average of 3.5 years (range, 2.2-5.8 years) after RCT completion. Despite greater weight, fat and lean mass loss during the RCT (mean difference in change (95% CI): -4.19 (-7.52, -0.86), -2.75 (-5.10, -0.40), and -2.32 (-3.69, -0.95) kg, respectively) in those randomized to CR + EX, long-term changes in weight (2.05 (-2.35, 6.45) kg) and body composition (1.80 (-1.56, 5.17) and 0.03 (-2.20, 2.26) kg for fat and lean mass, respectively) from baseline and physical function at long-term follow-up (mean difference in 400-m walk and SPPB (95% CI): 23.2 (-19.3, 65.6) sec and -0.03 (-1.02, 0.96) points, respectively) were similar in CR + EX and EX only. Although improvements in weight and body composition following intentional weight loss may not be sustained long-term, physical function does not appear to be negatively impacted. A larger study is needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":38899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics","volume":"38 1","pages":"83-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21551197.2019.1572570","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21551197.2019.1572570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) show intentional weight loss improves body composition and physical function in older adults; however, the long-term benefits (and risks) are unknown. We conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility of recalling prior RCT participants to examine the long-term effects of intentional weight loss on body composition and physical function. A weighted, random sample of 60 older adults who were randomized to caloric restriction plus exercise (CR + EX) or exercise (EX) only in 5 prior RCTs (mean age at randomization, 67.3 years; 69% women, 80% white) were invited to participate. Follow-up was obtained on 89% (42 clinic visits, 10 phone interviews, 1 death) an average of 3.5 years (range, 2.2-5.8 years) after RCT completion. Despite greater weight, fat and lean mass loss during the RCT (mean difference in change (95% CI): -4.19 (-7.52, -0.86), -2.75 (-5.10, -0.40), and -2.32 (-3.69, -0.95) kg, respectively) in those randomized to CR + EX, long-term changes in weight (2.05 (-2.35, 6.45) kg) and body composition (1.80 (-1.56, 5.17) and 0.03 (-2.20, 2.26) kg for fat and lean mass, respectively) from baseline and physical function at long-term follow-up (mean difference in 400-m walk and SPPB (95% CI): 23.2 (-19.3, 65.6) sec and -0.03 (-1.02, 0.96) points, respectively) were similar in CR + EX and EX only. Although improvements in weight and body composition following intentional weight loss may not be sustained long-term, physical function does not appear to be negatively impacted. A larger study is needed to confirm these results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机化对老年人减肥干预的长期影响:一项试点研究。
随机对照试验(RCTs)显示,有意减肥可以改善老年人的身体成分和身体功能;然而,长期的好处(和风险)是未知的。我们进行了一项试点研究,以评估召回先前的随机对照试验参与者的可行性,以检查有意减肥对身体成分和身体功能的长期影响。在之前的5项随机对照试验中,60名老年人被随机分为热量限制加运动(CR + EX)或运动(EX)两组(随机化时平均年龄67.3岁;69%的女性,80%的白人)被邀请参加。随访时间为89%(42次诊所就诊,10次电话访谈,1例死亡),随访时间为随机对照试验结束后平均3.5年(范围2.2-5.8年)。尽管随机分配到CR + EX组的患者在RCT期间体重、脂肪和瘦体重损失更大(变化的平均差异(95% CI): -4.19(-7.52, -0.86)、-2.75(-5.10,-0.40)和-2.32 (-3.69,-0.95)kg),但长期随访时,体重(脂肪和瘦体重分别为2.05 (-2.35,6.45)kg)和体成分(分别为1.80(-1.56,5.17)和0.03 (-2.20,2.26)kg)与基线和身体功能的变化(400米步行和SPPB的平均差异(95% CI)):分别为23.2(-19.3,65.6)秒和-0.03(-1.02,0.96)点)。虽然有意减肥后体重和身体成分的改善可能无法长期持续,但身体功能似乎没有受到负面影响。需要更大规模的研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics
Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics publishes original research studies that are directly relevant to clinical and community nutrition issues that affect older adults. Epidemiologic and community-based studies are suitable for JNE, as are well-controlled clinical trials of preventive and therapeutic nutritional interventions. The Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics invites papers on a broad array of topics in the nutrition and aging field, including but not limited to studies of: preventive nutrition, nutritional interventions for chronic disease, aging effects on nutritional requirements, nutritional status and dietary intake behaviors, nutritional frailty and functional status, usefulness of supplements, programmatic interventions, transitions in care and long term care, and community nutrition issues.
期刊最新文献
Food-Related Control and Person-Centered Care: Influences on Life Satisfaction in Long-Term Care Residents. Associations Between Hydration Status and Executive Function in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Findings from the Nationally Representative Health and Retirement Study. Food Insecurity and Diabetes Insulin Adherence Among Older Adults. Partners', Providers', and Rural Older Adults' Perspectives on Minnesota's Emergency Food System Emerging from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Changes in Weight or Body Composition by Frailty Status: A Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1