Hesam Ghiasvand, Peter Higgs, Mehdi Noroozi, Gholamreza Ghaedamini Harouni, Morteza Hemmat, Elahe Ahounbar, Javad Haroni, Seyran Naghdi, Ali Nazeri Astaneh, Bahram Armoon
{"title":"Social and demographical determinants of quality of life in people who live with HIV/AIDS infection: evidence from a meta-analysis.","authors":"Hesam Ghiasvand, Peter Higgs, Mehdi Noroozi, Gholamreza Ghaedamini Harouni, Morteza Hemmat, Elahe Ahounbar, Javad Haroni, Seyran Naghdi, Ali Nazeri Astaneh, Bahram Armoon","doi":"10.1080/19485565.2019.1587287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this meta-analysis is to summarize the available evidence on the social and demographic determinants of health-related quality of life (QoL) for HIV-infected populations in order to provide a direction to policy makers, planners, and program developers on how best to use their resources to improve the QoL of HIV-infected people.PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Cochrane electronic databases were searched (up to February 2017) to identify the relevant studies. A meta-analysis was conducted with procreate polled odds ratios (ORs and β) and the confidence intervals of 95% on determining factors of QoL in social and demographic terms. Random effect model was applied to calculate pooled estimation, due to varied sampling methods of researches.In total, 5607 papers were identified from 4 databases and additional search in reference lists. Of these, 2107 articles were selected for full-text review. We included 19 studies that met the eligibility criteria. The pooled effect size shows a relative positive impact of social support for QoL among HIV/AIDS patients and its lower boundary is about 0.61 and the higher about 1.49. The pooled effect size has a considerable negative impact stigma on people who live with HIV/AIDS (PWLHs') QoL ranges from -0.34 to -0.32. Low socioeconomic status (poverty situation) was found to have a degenerative impact with PWLHs' QoL. Our finding indicates an association between younger 35 and QoL is negative with a relatively wide range, the minimum level of education has a weak association with PWLHs' QoL (ES: 0.14-0.2).There are several sociodemographic determinants of QoL among PWLHs and in this study, we found that stigma, low level of socioeconomic status, and being younger than 35 years old have a negative association with QoL, while the social support showed a positive association and a minimum level of education did not show a rigorous negative or positive association.</p>","PeriodicalId":45428,"journal":{"name":"Biodemography and Social Biology","volume":"65 1","pages":"57-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19485565.2019.1587287","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodemography and Social Biology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.2019.1587287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41
Abstract
The aim of this meta-analysis is to summarize the available evidence on the social and demographic determinants of health-related quality of life (QoL) for HIV-infected populations in order to provide a direction to policy makers, planners, and program developers on how best to use their resources to improve the QoL of HIV-infected people.PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Cochrane electronic databases were searched (up to February 2017) to identify the relevant studies. A meta-analysis was conducted with procreate polled odds ratios (ORs and β) and the confidence intervals of 95% on determining factors of QoL in social and demographic terms. Random effect model was applied to calculate pooled estimation, due to varied sampling methods of researches.In total, 5607 papers were identified from 4 databases and additional search in reference lists. Of these, 2107 articles were selected for full-text review. We included 19 studies that met the eligibility criteria. The pooled effect size shows a relative positive impact of social support for QoL among HIV/AIDS patients and its lower boundary is about 0.61 and the higher about 1.49. The pooled effect size has a considerable negative impact stigma on people who live with HIV/AIDS (PWLHs') QoL ranges from -0.34 to -0.32. Low socioeconomic status (poverty situation) was found to have a degenerative impact with PWLHs' QoL. Our finding indicates an association between younger 35 and QoL is negative with a relatively wide range, the minimum level of education has a weak association with PWLHs' QoL (ES: 0.14-0.2).There are several sociodemographic determinants of QoL among PWLHs and in this study, we found that stigma, low level of socioeconomic status, and being younger than 35 years old have a negative association with QoL, while the social support showed a positive association and a minimum level of education did not show a rigorous negative or positive association.
本荟萃分析的目的是总结有关hiv感染者健康相关生活质量(QoL)的社会和人口统计学决定因素的现有证据,以便为政策制定者、计划者和项目开发者提供指导,指导他们如何最好地利用资源来改善hiv感染者的生活质量。检索PubMed、Science Direct、Web of Science和Cochrane电子数据库(截至2017年2月)以确定相关研究。采用生殖调查优势比(ORs和β)和95%的置信区间对社会和人口统计学方面的生活质量决定因素进行meta分析。由于各研究的抽样方法不同,采用随机效应模型计算混合估计。共从4个数据库和参考文献列表中检索到5607篇论文。其中,选取2107篇文章进行全文综述。我们纳入了19项符合入选标准的研究。综上所示,社会支持对HIV/AIDS患者生活质量具有相对正向的影响,其下边界约为0.61,上边界约为1.49。综合效应大小对艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者(PWLHs)的生活质量有相当大的负面影响,范围为-0.34至-0.32。低社会经济地位(贫困状况)对PWLHs的生活质量有退行性影响。研究结果表明,年龄在35岁以下与生活质量呈负相关,且相关范围较广,最低受教育程度与生活质量呈弱相关(ES: 0.14-0.2)。影响残疾人生活质量的社会人口学因素有很多,其中污名、低社会经济地位和年龄小于35岁与残疾人生活质量有负相关,社会支持有正相关,最低受教育程度与残疾人生活质量无显著正相关。
期刊介绍:
Biodemography and Social Biology is the official journal of The Society for the Study of Social Biology, devoted to furthering the discussion, advancement, and dissemination of knowledge about biological and sociocultural forces affecting the structure and composition of human populations. This interdisciplinary publication features contributions from scholars in the fields of sociology, demography, psychology, anthropology, biology, genetics, criminal justice, and others. Original manuscripts that further knowledge in the area of social biology are welcome, along with brief reports, review articles, and book reviews.