{"title":"Effectiveness of antibiotic stewardship programmes in primary health care settings in developing countries","authors":"Irene Brinkmann, Dan Kibuule","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (AMS), antibiotic resistance<span> are a rising a major global concern, and the burden is estimated increase. Little is known about program effectiveness, particularly in primary care and in developing nations.</span></p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To assess the effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in primary health care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A case study assessed the effectiveness of implementation of antimicrobial stewardship at 10 primary health care facilities in Windhoek. From 1 to 31 October 2018, a SWOT analysis of each health facility was conducted through an audit and interview of infection control focal persons to assess the level of compliance to good antimicrobial stewardship practices and policies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 10 facilities, 90% of the focal persons were aware of systems and polices for good AMS practice. The level of compliance at hospital-based primary health centers was 30.8% compared to clinics (9.1%–36.4%). The main challenge is lack of policies and systems specific to antimicrobial use as well as commitment of financial and human resources to implement AMS programmes in primary health care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in primary health care is suboptimal. This negatively affects the global efforts to control antimicrobial resistance. There is a need to institutionalise national guidelines for AMS in primary health care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":"16 9","pages":"Pages 1309-1313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.03.008","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155174111930172X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Background
Despite the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (AMS), antibiotic resistance are a rising a major global concern, and the burden is estimated increase. Little is known about program effectiveness, particularly in primary care and in developing nations.
Aim
To assess the effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in primary health care.
Methods
A case study assessed the effectiveness of implementation of antimicrobial stewardship at 10 primary health care facilities in Windhoek. From 1 to 31 October 2018, a SWOT analysis of each health facility was conducted through an audit and interview of infection control focal persons to assess the level of compliance to good antimicrobial stewardship practices and policies.
Results
Of the 10 facilities, 90% of the focal persons were aware of systems and polices for good AMS practice. The level of compliance at hospital-based primary health centers was 30.8% compared to clinics (9.1%–36.4%). The main challenge is lack of policies and systems specific to antimicrobial use as well as commitment of financial and human resources to implement AMS programmes in primary health care.
Conclusion
The implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in primary health care is suboptimal. This negatively affects the global efforts to control antimicrobial resistance. There is a need to institutionalise national guidelines for AMS in primary health care.
期刊介绍:
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.