Impact of a Comprehensive COPD Therapeutic Interchange Program on 30-Day Readmission Rates in Hospitalized Patients.

Q1 Medicine P and T Pub Date : 2019-04-01
Maren A McGurran, Lisa M Richter, Nathan D Leedahl, David D Leedahl
{"title":"Impact of a Comprehensive COPD Therapeutic Interchange Program on 30-Day Readmission Rates in Hospitalized Patients.","authors":"Maren A McGurran,&nbsp;Lisa M Richter,&nbsp;Nathan D Leedahl,&nbsp;David D Leedahl","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death in the United States. The economic effect of COPD management is substantial, and the prevalence of the disease continues to rise with the growth of older populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and financial impact of a comprehensive therapeutic interchange program (CTIP) in hospitalized patients with COPD. The primary outcome was a 30-day readmission rate, with the following secondary outcomes: 30-day mortality and pharmacy-inhaled medication cost per patient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a multi-center, retrospective, electronic chart review of patients with a diagnosis of COPD admitted to two hospitals from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017. Our intervention group was admitted to a 550-bed tertiary care hospital and was managed with a pharmacist-led CTIP for inhaled products used in COPD. Our control group was admitted to a 545-bed tertiary care hospital, which did not have a CTIP in place.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2,885 hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of COPD were included in the analysis (1,350 in the intervention group and 1,535 in the control group). Univariable analysis demonstrated that the intervention group was associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate (5.8% vs. 8.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.012) and a lower average pharmacy-inhaled medication cost ($221 vs. $311; <i>P</i> = < 0.01). There was no statistical difference in 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that the use of a pharmacist-led CTIP of COPD inhalers does not worsen patient outcomes and may provide pharmacy cost savings. The cohort managed with a CTIP was statistically associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate and lower pharmacy-inhaled medication costs without any difference in 30-day mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":38773,"journal":{"name":"P and T","volume":"44 4","pages":"185-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428498/pdf/ptj4404185.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"P and T","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death in the United States. The economic effect of COPD management is substantial, and the prevalence of the disease continues to rise with the growth of older populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and financial impact of a comprehensive therapeutic interchange program (CTIP) in hospitalized patients with COPD. The primary outcome was a 30-day readmission rate, with the following secondary outcomes: 30-day mortality and pharmacy-inhaled medication cost per patient.

Methods: This study was a multi-center, retrospective, electronic chart review of patients with a diagnosis of COPD admitted to two hospitals from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017. Our intervention group was admitted to a 550-bed tertiary care hospital and was managed with a pharmacist-led CTIP for inhaled products used in COPD. Our control group was admitted to a 545-bed tertiary care hospital, which did not have a CTIP in place.

Results: 2,885 hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of COPD were included in the analysis (1,350 in the intervention group and 1,535 in the control group). Univariable analysis demonstrated that the intervention group was associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate (5.8% vs. 8.3%; P = 0.012) and a lower average pharmacy-inhaled medication cost ($221 vs. $311; P = < 0.01). There was no statistical difference in 30-day mortality.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the use of a pharmacist-led CTIP of COPD inhalers does not worsen patient outcomes and may provide pharmacy cost savings. The cohort managed with a CTIP was statistically associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate and lower pharmacy-inhaled medication costs without any difference in 30-day mortality.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合COPD治疗交换方案对住院患者30天再入院率的影响
目的:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是美国第三大死亡原因。慢性阻塞性肺病管理的经济效果是巨大的,随着老年人口的增长,该疾病的患病率继续上升。本研究的目的是评估综合治疗交换计划(CTIP)对住院COPD患者的临床和财务影响。主要终点是30天再入院率,次要终点是30天死亡率和每位患者的药物吸入费用。方法:本研究对2016年7月1日至2017年6月30日两家医院诊断为COPD的患者进行了多中心、回顾性、电子病历回顾。我们的干预组住进了一家拥有550张床位的三级医院,由药剂师领导的慢性阻塞性肺病吸入产品CTIP管理。我们的对照组被送往一家拥有545张床位的三级医院,该医院没有CTIP。结果:2885例诊断为COPD的住院患者被纳入分析(干预组1350例,对照组1535例)。单变量分析表明,干预组的30天再入院率较低(5.8% vs 8.3%;P = 0.012),平均吸入药物费用较低(221美元对311美元;P = < 0.01)。30天死亡率无统计学差异。结论:本研究表明,使用药剂师主导的慢性阻塞性肺病吸入器CTIP不会使患者预后恶化,并可能节省药费。使用CTIP管理的队列在统计学上与较低的30天再入院率和较低的药物吸入药物成本相关,但在30天死亡率方面没有任何差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
P and T
P and T Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Better. American Society of Clinical Oncology Is Ciprofloxacin in Combination With Beta-lactam Antibiotics a Recipe for Thrombocytosis?: A Case Report of Thrombocytosis in a Patient Receiving Ciprofloxacin and Ceftriaxone. Outcomes of Inpatient Administration of Restricted Antineoplastic Medications at a Large Academic Medical Institution. PerserisTM: A New and Long-Acting, Atypical Antipsychotic Drug-Delivery System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1