Effects of formulation types on pharmacodynamics of warfarin in patients with cerebral infarction and dysphagia.

IF 3.1 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications Pub Date : 2019-03-13 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CPAA.S184232
Young-Ji Kim, Jong-Woo Jeong, Youngshin Song, Tae-Sung Koo
{"title":"Effects of formulation types on pharmacodynamics of warfarin in patients with cerebral infarction and dysphagia.","authors":"Young-Ji Kim,&nbsp;Jong-Woo Jeong,&nbsp;Youngshin Song,&nbsp;Tae-Sung Koo","doi":"10.2147/CPAA.S184232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the type of formulation on the efficacy of warfarin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The electronic medical records of patients with cerebral infarction, who were administered tablet or powder formulations of warfarin from 2013-2015, were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical data, changes in the international normalized ratio (INR), the warfarin dose, and the time to reach the plasma warfarin concentration that could induce an adverse effect, such as bleeding, were evaluated. Coefficients of variation of INR and of the warfarin dose, as well as the warfarin sensitivity index (WSI), were used to evaluate the INR stability. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using a independent <i>t</i>-test. Additionally, survival analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data showed that 57 and 137 patients were administered warfarin as powder and tablet formulations, respectively. We noted that INR, WSI, and INR/dose × body weight differed significantly between the two groups of patients. The median survival times to reach the plasma warfarin concentration that could induce adverse effects were 3.6 and 4.2 days of treatment with the powder and tablet formulations, respectively. The efficacy of warfarin was higher when the drug was administered as a powder than when it was administered as a tablet.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study indicate that INR should be carefully monitored in the first 4 days of warfarin administration as a powder formulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10406,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","volume":"11 ","pages":"51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CPAA.S184232","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S184232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the type of formulation on the efficacy of warfarin.

Materials and methods: The electronic medical records of patients with cerebral infarction, who were administered tablet or powder formulations of warfarin from 2013-2015, were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical data, changes in the international normalized ratio (INR), the warfarin dose, and the time to reach the plasma warfarin concentration that could induce an adverse effect, such as bleeding, were evaluated. Coefficients of variation of INR and of the warfarin dose, as well as the warfarin sensitivity index (WSI), were used to evaluate the INR stability. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using a independent t-test. Additionally, survival analysis was performed.

Results: The data showed that 57 and 137 patients were administered warfarin as powder and tablet formulations, respectively. We noted that INR, WSI, and INR/dose × body weight differed significantly between the two groups of patients. The median survival times to reach the plasma warfarin concentration that could induce adverse effects were 3.6 and 4.2 days of treatment with the powder and tablet formulations, respectively. The efficacy of warfarin was higher when the drug was administered as a powder than when it was administered as a tablet.

Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that INR should be carefully monitored in the first 4 days of warfarin administration as a powder formulation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同剂型对脑梗死伴吞咽困难患者华法林药效学的影响。
目的:探讨不同剂型对华法林疗效的影响。材料与方法:回顾性分析2013-2015年使用华法林片剂或粉剂的脑梗死患者的电子病历。评估临床数据、国际标准化比值(INR)的变化、华法林剂量、达到血浆华法林浓度可能引起的不良反应(如出血)的时间。采用INR变异系数和华法林剂量变异系数以及华法林敏感性指数(WSI)评价INR的稳定性。采用独立t检验对数据进行统计分析。此外,还进行了生存分析。结果:57例和137例患者分别使用华法林粉剂和片剂。我们注意到两组患者的INR、WSI和INR/剂量×体重差异显著。达到可引起不良反应的血浆华法林浓度的中位生存时间分别为粉剂治疗3.6天和片剂治疗4.2天。华法林粉剂比片剂的疗效更高。结论:本研究结果表明,在华法林粉剂给药的头4天应仔细监测INR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Severe Hypertensive Response to Atropine Therapy for Bradycardia Associated with Dexmedetomidine: Case Report and Literature Review. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Dronedarone and Amiodarone Used During the Blind Period in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation Ipratropium Bromide/Salbutamol-Induced Acute Urinary Retention as a Result of Medication Error: A Case Report and Review of Cases in the Literature. Allopurinol-Induced Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS). Systematic Review of Safety of RTS,S with AS01 and AS02 Adjuvant Systems Using Data from Randomized Controlled Trials in Infants, Children, and Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1