{"title":"Prenatal catch-up growth: A study in avian embryos","authors":"Jacopo P. Mortola","doi":"10.1016/j.mod.2019.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Whether the growth of embryos after a period of stunt becomes accelerated (Catch-Up Growth, CUGr), as it occurs postnatally, has rarely been examined experimentally in any class of animals. Here, hypoxia or cold of different degrees and durations caused growth retardation in chicken embryos during the first or second week of incubation. On average, on the day of removal of the growth-inhibition, the weight of the experimental groups was 73% (wet) and 61% (dry) of control embryos, while near end-incubation (embryonic day E18) their weight averaged significantly more, respectively, 80% and 84% of controls (<em>P</em> < 0.001). When compared as function of developmental time, the post-intervention growth of experimental embryos was faster than that of controls. The faster growth was fully accounted for by their smaller weight at end-intervention, because embryonic growth is higher the smaller the weight. Hence, their growth was appropriate for their weight, rather than for their age. In fact, out of eight different models of growth based on age and weight (wet or dry) in various combination, the model based on embryonic wet weight at end-intervention, and weight alone, was the best predictor of the embryo's post-intervention growth. The oxygen consumption of the experimental embryos during CUGr was appropriate for their weight. In conclusion, in this experimental model of CUGr, the embryo's weight at the end of a stunt could fully predict and explain the rate of growth during the post-intervention recovery period.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49844,"journal":{"name":"Mechanisms of Development","volume":"156 ","pages":"Pages 32-40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mod.2019.03.003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanisms of Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925477318301710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Whether the growth of embryos after a period of stunt becomes accelerated (Catch-Up Growth, CUGr), as it occurs postnatally, has rarely been examined experimentally in any class of animals. Here, hypoxia or cold of different degrees and durations caused growth retardation in chicken embryos during the first or second week of incubation. On average, on the day of removal of the growth-inhibition, the weight of the experimental groups was 73% (wet) and 61% (dry) of control embryos, while near end-incubation (embryonic day E18) their weight averaged significantly more, respectively, 80% and 84% of controls (P < 0.001). When compared as function of developmental time, the post-intervention growth of experimental embryos was faster than that of controls. The faster growth was fully accounted for by their smaller weight at end-intervention, because embryonic growth is higher the smaller the weight. Hence, their growth was appropriate for their weight, rather than for their age. In fact, out of eight different models of growth based on age and weight (wet or dry) in various combination, the model based on embryonic wet weight at end-intervention, and weight alone, was the best predictor of the embryo's post-intervention growth. The oxygen consumption of the experimental embryos during CUGr was appropriate for their weight. In conclusion, in this experimental model of CUGr, the embryo's weight at the end of a stunt could fully predict and explain the rate of growth during the post-intervention recovery period.
期刊介绍:
Mechanisms of Development is an international journal covering the areas of cell biology and developmental biology. In addition to publishing work at the interphase of these two disciplines, we also publish work that is purely cell biology as well as classical developmental biology.
Mechanisms of Development will consider papers in any area of cell biology or developmental biology, in any model system like animals and plants, using a variety of approaches, such as cellular, biomechanical, molecular, quantitative, computational and theoretical biology.
Areas of particular interest include:
Cell and tissue morphogenesis
Cell adhesion and migration
Cell shape and polarity
Biomechanics
Theoretical modelling of cell and developmental biology
Quantitative biology
Stem cell biology
Cell differentiation
Cell proliferation and cell death
Evo-Devo
Membrane traffic
Metabolic regulation
Organ and organoid development
Regeneration
Mechanisms of Development does not publish descriptive studies of gene expression patterns and molecular screens; for submission of such studies see Gene Expression Patterns.