Surgical management of giant presacral schwannoma: systematic review of published cases and meta-analysis.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2019-07-05 Print Date: 2019-11-01 DOI:10.3171/2019.4.SPINE19240
Zach Pennington, Erick M Westbroek, A Karim Ahmed, Ethan Cottrill, Daniel Lubelski, Matthew L Goodwin, Daniel M Sciubba
{"title":"Surgical management of giant presacral schwannoma: systematic review of published cases and meta-analysis.","authors":"Zach Pennington, Erick M Westbroek, A Karim Ahmed, Ethan Cottrill, Daniel Lubelski, Matthew L Goodwin, Daniel M Sciubba","doi":"10.3171/2019.4.SPINE19240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Giant presacral schwannomas are rare sacral tumors found in less than 1 of every 40,000 hospitalizations. Current management of these tumors is based solely upon case reports and small case series. In this paper the authors report the results of a systematic review of the available English literature on presacral schwannoma, focused on identifying the influence of tumor size, tumor morphology, surgical approach, and extent of resection (EOR) on recurrence-free survival and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical literature (PubMed and EMBASE) was queried for reports of surgically managed sacral schwannoma, either involving 2 or more contiguous vertebral levels or with a diameter ≥ 5 cm. Tumor size and morphology, surgical approach, EOR, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and survival data were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-six articles were included, covering 123 unique patients (mean age 44.1 ± 1.4 years, 50.4% male). The most common presenting symptoms were leg pain (28.7%), lower back pain (21.3%), and constipation (15.7%). Most surgeries used an open anterior-only (40.0%) or posterior-only (30%) approach. Postoperative complications occurred in 25.6% of patients and local recurrence was noted in 5.4%. En bloc resection significantly improved progression-free survival relative to subtotal resection (p = 0.03). No difference existed between en bloc and gross-total resection (GTR; p = 0.25) or among the surgical approaches (p = 0.66). Postoperative complications were more common following anterior versus posterior approaches (p = 0.04). Surgical blood loss was significantly correlated with operative duration and tumor volume on multiple linear regression (both p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Presacral schwannoma can reasonably be treated with either en bloc or piecemeal GTR. The approach should be dictated by lesion morphology, and recurrence is infrequent. Anterior approaches may increase the risk of postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"711-722"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.4.SPINE19240","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Giant presacral schwannomas are rare sacral tumors found in less than 1 of every 40,000 hospitalizations. Current management of these tumors is based solely upon case reports and small case series. In this paper the authors report the results of a systematic review of the available English literature on presacral schwannoma, focused on identifying the influence of tumor size, tumor morphology, surgical approach, and extent of resection (EOR) on recurrence-free survival and postoperative complications.

Methods: The medical literature (PubMed and EMBASE) was queried for reports of surgically managed sacral schwannoma, either involving 2 or more contiguous vertebral levels or with a diameter ≥ 5 cm. Tumor size and morphology, surgical approach, EOR, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and survival data were recorded.

Results: Seventy-six articles were included, covering 123 unique patients (mean age 44.1 ± 1.4 years, 50.4% male). The most common presenting symptoms were leg pain (28.7%), lower back pain (21.3%), and constipation (15.7%). Most surgeries used an open anterior-only (40.0%) or posterior-only (30%) approach. Postoperative complications occurred in 25.6% of patients and local recurrence was noted in 5.4%. En bloc resection significantly improved progression-free survival relative to subtotal resection (p = 0.03). No difference existed between en bloc and gross-total resection (GTR; p = 0.25) or among the surgical approaches (p = 0.66). Postoperative complications were more common following anterior versus posterior approaches (p = 0.04). Surgical blood loss was significantly correlated with operative duration and tumor volume on multiple linear regression (both p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Presacral schwannoma can reasonably be treated with either en bloc or piecemeal GTR. The approach should be dictated by lesion morphology, and recurrence is infrequent. Anterior approaches may increase the risk of postoperative complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巨大骶前神经分裂瘤的手术治疗:已发表病例的系统性回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:骶前巨大分裂瘤是一种罕见的骶骨肿瘤,每 4 万例住院患者中只有不到 1 例发现这种肿瘤。目前对这些肿瘤的治疗仅基于病例报告和小型病例系列。在本文中,作者报告了对现有骶前神经分裂瘤英文文献的系统性综述结果,重点是确定肿瘤大小、肿瘤形态、手术方法和切除范围(EOR)对无复发生存率和术后并发症的影响:在医学文献(PubMed 和 EMBASE)中查询了有关手术治疗骶椎裂孔瘤的报告,这些肿瘤涉及 2 个或更多连续的椎体水平或直径≥ 5 厘米。记录了肿瘤大小和形态、手术方法、EOR、术中和术后并发症以及存活数据:结果:共收录了 76 篇文章,涉及 123 名患者(平均年龄为 44.1 ± 1.4 岁,50.4% 为男性)。最常见的症状是腿痛(28.7%)、下背痛(21.3%)和便秘(15.7%)。大多数手术采用开放式前路(40.0%)或后路(30%)。25.6%的患者出现术后并发症,5.4%的患者出现局部复发。与次全切除术相比,全块切除术明显提高了无进展生存率(p = 0.03)。全块切除术和大块全切除术(GTR;p = 0.25)之间或各种手术方法之间没有差异(p = 0.66)。前路与后路手术的术后并发症更常见(p = 0.04)。在多元线性回归中,手术失血量与手术时间和肿瘤体积明显相关(均 p < 0.001):结论:骶前分裂瘤可通过整体或分块 GTR 治疗。结论:骶前神经分裂瘤可采用整体或分块 GTR 治疗,治疗方法应根据病变形态而定,复发率较低。前方入路可能会增加术后并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the influence of patient traits versus surgical intervention on outcomes across spine surgeries: a latent state-trait analysis. Healthcare fraud and abuse in spine surgery: a review of medicolegal actions brought by the United States federal government. Role of hip and lumbar flexion angles in stiffness-related disabilities with activities of daily living after lumbar spine surgery. Editorial. Impact of hip flexibility on clinical outcome after lumbar spinal fusion: an overlooked parameter in patient evaluation. Outcomes of percutaneous pedicle screw stabilization for metastatic spine disease: a 10-year experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1