Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias Pub Date : 2019-08-01 Epub Date: 2019-04-15 DOI:10.1177/1533317519843720
Apostolos Manolopoulos, Panagiotis Andreadis, Konstantinos Malandris, Ioannis Avgerinos, Thomas Karagiannis, Dimitrios Kapogiannis, Magda Tsolaki, Apostolos Tsapas, Eleni Bekiari
{"title":"Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Apostolos Manolopoulos,&nbsp;Panagiotis Andreadis,&nbsp;Konstantinos Malandris,&nbsp;Ioannis Avgerinos,&nbsp;Thomas Karagiannis,&nbsp;Dimitrios Kapogiannis,&nbsp;Magda Tsolaki,&nbsp;Apostolos Tsapas,&nbsp;Eleni Bekiari","doi":"10.1177/1533317519843720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched electronic databases and other sources for randomized controlled trials comparing IVIg with placebo or other treatment for adults with AD. Primary outcome was change from baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five placebo-controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to placebo, IVIg 0.2 and 0.4 g/kg once every two weeks did not change ADAS-Cog score (weighted mean difference: 0.37, 95% confidence interval: -1.46 to 2.20 and 0.77, -1.34 to 2.88, respectively). Furthermore, except for an increase in the incidence of rash, IVIg did not affect the incidence of other adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IVIg, albeit safe, is inefficacious for treatment of patients with AD. Future trials targeting earlier stages of disease or applying different dosing regimens may be warranted to clarify its therapeutic potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":50816,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias","volume":"34 5","pages":"281-289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1533317519843720","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317519843720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Materials and methods: We searched electronic databases and other sources for randomized controlled trials comparing IVIg with placebo or other treatment for adults with AD. Primary outcome was change from baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog).

Results: Five placebo-controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to placebo, IVIg 0.2 and 0.4 g/kg once every two weeks did not change ADAS-Cog score (weighted mean difference: 0.37, 95% confidence interval: -1.46 to 2.20 and 0.77, -1.34 to 2.88, respectively). Furthermore, except for an increase in the incidence of rash, IVIg did not affect the incidence of other adverse events.

Conclusion: IVIg, albeit safe, is inefficacious for treatment of patients with AD. Future trials targeting earlier stages of disease or applying different dosing regimens may be warranted to clarify its therapeutic potential.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射免疫球蛋白治疗阿尔茨海默病患者:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
目的:评价静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:我们检索了电子数据库和其他来源的随机对照试验,比较IVIg与安慰剂或其他治疗成人AD的疗效。主要结局是阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知亚量表(ADAS-Cog)较基线的变化。结果:meta分析纳入了5项安慰剂对照试验。与安慰剂相比,每两周一次IVIg 0.2和0.4 g/kg没有改变ADAS-Cog评分(加权平均差值:0.37,95%可信区间分别为-1.46至2.20和0.77,-1.34至2.88)。此外,除了皮疹发生率增加外,IVIg对其他不良事件的发生率没有影响。结论:IVIg虽然安全,但对AD患者的治疗无效。未来针对疾病早期阶段或应用不同剂量方案的试验可能有必要澄清其治疗潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias
American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease and other Dementias® (AJADD) is for professionals on the frontlines of Alzheimer''s care, dementia, and clinical depression--especially physicians, nurses, psychiatrists, administrators, and other healthcare specialists who manage patients with dementias and their families. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
The Psychological Symptoms and Their Relationship to the Quality of Life Among Dementia Patients Caregivers Different Splice Isoforms of Peripheral Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2 mRNA Expressions are Associated With Cognitive Decline in Mild Dementia Due to Alzheimer’s Disease and Reflect Central Neuroinflammation White Light Stimulation at Gamma Frequency to Modify the Aβ42 and tau Proteins in SH-SY5Y Cells Burden of Illness Among Patients with Psychosis due to Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Other Dementias. Task-Evoked Pupillary Response as a Potential Biomarker of Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1