Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of lung adhesion before surgery.

Q2 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Biomolecular Concepts Pub Date : 2019-07-12 DOI:10.1515/bmc-2019-0016
Mohsen Eshraghi, Ahmad Kachoie, Soroush Sharifimoghadam
{"title":"Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of lung adhesion before surgery.","authors":"Mohsen Eshraghi,&nbsp;Ahmad Kachoie,&nbsp;Soroush Sharifimoghadam","doi":"10.1515/bmc-2019-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The presence of pleural adhesions may render video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery difficult or impossible. The aim of this study was to assess the value of chest ultrasonography in the detection of pleural adhesions prior to thoracotomy. Methods Between 2013 and 2014, 42 consecutive patients undergoing thoracotomies (including video-assisted thoracicsurgery) were evaluated with chest ultrasonography. These patients underwent a preoperative ultrasonic examination of the chestwall using a 7.5-10-MHz linear ultrasound probe at 7 points along the chest wall. We measured the movement of the visceral pleuralslide. Results In the upper thoracic wall,ultrasonography demonstrated a sensitivity of 63.0%, a specificity of 66%, a negative predictive value of 77%, a positive predictive evalue of 50.0%, and an overall accuracy of 65.0%. And for the lower thoracic wall, ultrasonography demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.0%, a specificity of 59.0%,a negative predictive value of 89.0%, a positive predictivevalue of 44.0%, and an overall accuracy of 65.0%. Conclusion Chest ultrasonography is moderately accurate in detecting the presence and location of pleural adhesions. The use of preoperative chest sonographic findings to plan trocar placement and to determine the need for an open approach is valuable in helping prevent visceral injury and facilitating video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":38392,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecular Concepts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/bmc-2019-0016","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecular Concepts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bmc-2019-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background The presence of pleural adhesions may render video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery difficult or impossible. The aim of this study was to assess the value of chest ultrasonography in the detection of pleural adhesions prior to thoracotomy. Methods Between 2013 and 2014, 42 consecutive patients undergoing thoracotomies (including video-assisted thoracicsurgery) were evaluated with chest ultrasonography. These patients underwent a preoperative ultrasonic examination of the chestwall using a 7.5-10-MHz linear ultrasound probe at 7 points along the chest wall. We measured the movement of the visceral pleuralslide. Results In the upper thoracic wall,ultrasonography demonstrated a sensitivity of 63.0%, a specificity of 66%, a negative predictive value of 77%, a positive predictive evalue of 50.0%, and an overall accuracy of 65.0%. And for the lower thoracic wall, ultrasonography demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.0%, a specificity of 59.0%,a negative predictive value of 89.0%, a positive predictivevalue of 44.0%, and an overall accuracy of 65.0%. Conclusion Chest ultrasonography is moderately accurate in detecting the presence and location of pleural adhesions. The use of preoperative chest sonographic findings to plan trocar placement and to determine the need for an open approach is valuable in helping prevent visceral injury and facilitating video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声检查在术前肺粘连诊断中的价值。
背景胸膜粘连的存在可能使电视胸腔镜手术变得困难或不可能。本研究的目的是评估胸部超声检查在开胸术前胸膜粘连的价值。方法对2013 - 2014年42例连续行开胸手术(含胸腔镜)的患者进行胸部超声检查。这些患者术前使用7.5-10 mhz线性超声探头沿胸壁7点进行胸壁超声检查。我们测量了内脏胸膜薄片的运动。结果超声对上胸壁的诊断敏感性为63.0%,特异性为66%,阴性预测值为77%,阳性预测值为50.0%,总体准确率为65.0%。下胸壁超声诊断的敏感性为81.0%,特异性为59.0%,阴性预测值为89.0%,阳性预测值为44.0%,总体准确率为65.0%。结论胸部超声检查胸膜粘连的存在及位置具有中等的准确性。使用术前胸部超声检查结果来计划套管针放置和确定是否需要开放入路,对于帮助预防内脏损伤和促进视频胸腔镜手术是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomolecular Concepts
Biomolecular Concepts Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BioMolecular Concepts is a peer-reviewed open access journal fostering the integration of different fields of biomolecular research. The journal aims to provide expert summaries from prominent researchers, and conclusive extensions of research data leading to new and original, testable hypotheses. Aspects of research that can promote related fields, and lead to novel insight into biological mechanisms or potential medical applications are of special interest. Original research articles reporting new data of broad significance are also welcome. Topics: -cellular and molecular biology- genetics and epigenetics- biochemistry- structural biology- neurosciences- developmental biology- molecular medicine- pharmacology- microbiology- plant biology and biotechnology.
期刊最新文献
Toxicity of bisphenol A and p-nitrophenol on tomato plants: Morpho-physiological, ionomic profile, and antioxidants/defense-related gene expression studies. A comprehensive review of the interaction between COVID-19 spike proteins with mammalian small and major heat shock proteins. Biochemical dynamics during postharvest: Highlighting the interplay of stress during storage and maturation of fresh produce. Seeing beyond the blot: A critical look at assumptions and raw data interpretation in Western blotting. Senescent adipocytes and type 2 diabetes - current knowledge and perspective concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1