Meta-analysis of the correlation between personality characteristics and risky driving behaviors.

Journal of injury & violence research Pub Date : 2019-07-01 Epub Date: 2019-04-28 DOI:10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1172
Maryam Akbari, Kamran B Lankarani, Seyed Taghi Heydari, Seyed Abbas Motevalian, Reza Tabrizi, Zohreh Asadi-Shekari, Mark J M Sullman
{"title":"Meta-analysis of the correlation between personality characteristics and risky driving behaviors.","authors":"Maryam Akbari,&nbsp;Kamran B Lankarani,&nbsp;Seyed Taghi Heydari,&nbsp;Seyed Abbas Motevalian,&nbsp;Reza Tabrizi,&nbsp;Zohreh Asadi-Shekari,&nbsp;Mark J M Sullman","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine the relationships risky driving behaviors (RDBs) have with the big five personality factors, sensation seeking and driving anger.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, Psychinfo, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. All original studies were retrieved that assessed the relationships RDBs had with the big five personality factors, sensation seeking, and driving anger. Heterogeneity between studies was examined using the Cochran Q statistic and I2 tests. After applying Fisher's r-to-z transformation, the correlation coefficients (r) were summarized from each study and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 22 studies were included in the meta-analysis, which included 11211 participants. The results showed that RDBs had a significant negative relationship with agreeableness (r -0.27; 95% CI, -0.36, -0.19; P less than 0.0001), but significant positive relationships with neuroticism (r 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03, 0.29; P=0.584), sensation seeking (r 0.28; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.33; P less than 0.0001) and driving anger (r 0.39; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.64; P=0.002). Conversely, RDBs were not significantly related to extraversion (r -0.01; 95% CI, -0.08, 0.05; P=0.705), conscientiousness (r -0.05; 95% CI, -0.21, 0.12; P=0.584), or openness (r -0.06; 95% CI, -0.12, 0.00; P=0.065).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therefore, it appears that individuals most likely to engage in risky driving behaviors would be low in agreeableness, but high in neuroticism, sensation seeking and driving anger.</p>","PeriodicalId":73795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of injury & violence research","volume":"11 2","pages":"107-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6646834/pdf/","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of injury & violence research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Background: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine the relationships risky driving behaviors (RDBs) have with the big five personality factors, sensation seeking and driving anger.

Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, Psychinfo, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. All original studies were retrieved that assessed the relationships RDBs had with the big five personality factors, sensation seeking, and driving anger. Heterogeneity between studies was examined using the Cochran Q statistic and I2 tests. After applying Fisher's r-to-z transformation, the correlation coefficients (r) were summarized from each study and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated.

Results: Overall, 22 studies were included in the meta-analysis, which included 11211 participants. The results showed that RDBs had a significant negative relationship with agreeableness (r -0.27; 95% CI, -0.36, -0.19; P less than 0.0001), but significant positive relationships with neuroticism (r 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03, 0.29; P=0.584), sensation seeking (r 0.28; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.33; P less than 0.0001) and driving anger (r 0.39; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.64; P=0.002). Conversely, RDBs were not significantly related to extraversion (r -0.01; 95% CI, -0.08, 0.05; P=0.705), conscientiousness (r -0.05; 95% CI, -0.21, 0.12; P=0.584), or openness (r -0.06; 95% CI, -0.12, 0.00; P=0.065).

Conclusions: Therefore, it appears that individuals most likely to engage in risky driving behaviors would be low in agreeableness, but high in neuroticism, sensation seeking and driving anger.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人格特征与危险驾驶行为相关性的meta分析。
背景:通过系统回顾和meta分析,探讨危险驾驶行为与五大人格因素、感觉寻求和驾驶愤怒之间的关系。方法:系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Scopus、Psychinfo、Cochrane Library等数据库。所有的原始研究都评估了rdb与五大人格因素、寻求感觉和驾驶愤怒之间的关系。采用Cochran Q统计量和I2检验检验研究间的异质性。应用Fisher r-to-z变换后,总结各研究的相关系数(r),并估计95%置信区间(ci)。结果:总体上,22项研究纳入meta分析,其中包括11211名参与者。结果表明,rdb与亲和性呈显著负相关(r -0.27;95% ci, -0.36, -0.19;P < 0.0001),但与神经质呈显著正相关(r 0.16;95% ci, 0.03, 0.29;P=0.584),感觉寻求(r 0.28;95% ci: 0.23, 0.33;P < 0.0001)和驾驶愤怒(r 0.39;95% ci: 0.14, 0.64;P = 0.002)。相反,rdb与外向性无显著相关(r -0.01;95% ci, -0.08, 0.05;P=0.705),责任心(r -0.05;95% ci, -0.21, 0.12;P=0.584),或开放性(r -0.06;95% ci, -0.12, 0.00;P = 0.065)。结论:因此,最有可能从事危险驾驶行为的个体是亲和性较低,但神经质、感觉寻求和驾驶愤怒较高的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating the impact of Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety symptoms in female victims of domestic violence. The magnitude of parental physical harms: a descriptive report of 76 abusive children in Isfahan. Deaths and clashes induced by rivalry among fans during FIFA World Cup 2022 in Bangladesh. Factors affecting the spiritual rehabilitation of people affected by natural disasters: a systematic review. US States with poor social health outcomes and more firearms have more morbidity due to mass shootings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1