The safety of morphine use in acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.

Q2 Medicine Heart Asia Pub Date : 2019-03-19 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1136/heartasia-2018-011142
Rugheed Ghadban, Tariq Enezate, Joshua Payne, Haytham Allaham, Ahmad Halawa, Hee Kong Fong, Obai Abdullah, Kul Aggarwal
{"title":"The safety of morphine use in acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Rugheed Ghadban,&nbsp;Tariq Enezate,&nbsp;Joshua Payne,&nbsp;Haytham Allaham,&nbsp;Ahmad Halawa,&nbsp;Hee Kong Fong,&nbsp;Obai Abdullah,&nbsp;Kul Aggarwal","doi":"10.1136/heartasia-2018-011142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Morphine is widely used for pain control in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Several studies have questioned the safety of morphine in this setting with a concern of interaction with and reduced efficacy of antiplatelet agents.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to systematically review the safety of morphine use in ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were queried from inception through April 2018. Studies comparing morphine to nonmorphine use in ACS were included. Study endpoints included: in-hospital myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, stroke, major bleeding, minor bleeding and dyspnoea.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 323 patients with ACS were included from eight studies, seven of which were observational studies and one was a randomised controlled trial. The use of morphine was associated with increased risk of in-hospital recurrent MI (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.43, p < 0.00001). There was, however, no significant difference in terms of all-cause mortality (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.22, p = 0.44), stroke (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.66, p = 0.57), major bleeding (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.00, p = 0.05), minor bleeding (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.34, p = 0.97), or dyspnoea (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.83, p = 0.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of morphine for pain control in ACS was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital recurrent MI. Randomised clinical trials are needed to further investigate the safety of morphine in ACS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12858,"journal":{"name":"Heart Asia","volume":"11 1","pages":"e011142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/heartasia-2018-011142","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartasia-2018-011142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Morphine is widely used for pain control in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Several studies have questioned the safety of morphine in this setting with a concern of interaction with and reduced efficacy of antiplatelet agents.

Objective: This study aims to systematically review the safety of morphine use in ACS.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were queried from inception through April 2018. Studies comparing morphine to nonmorphine use in ACS were included. Study endpoints included: in-hospital myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, stroke, major bleeding, minor bleeding and dyspnoea.

Results: A total of 64 323 patients with ACS were included from eight studies, seven of which were observational studies and one was a randomised controlled trial. The use of morphine was associated with increased risk of in-hospital recurrent MI (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.43, p < 0.00001). There was, however, no significant difference in terms of all-cause mortality (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.22, p = 0.44), stroke (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.66, p = 0.57), major bleeding (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.00, p = 0.05), minor bleeding (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.34, p = 0.97), or dyspnoea (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.83, p = 0.33).

Conclusion: The use of morphine for pain control in ACS was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital recurrent MI. Randomised clinical trials are needed to further investigate the safety of morphine in ACS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性冠脉综合征使用吗啡的安全性:一项荟萃分析。
背景:吗啡被广泛用于急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的疼痛控制。一些研究质疑吗啡在这种情况下与抗血小板药物相互作用和降低疗效的安全性。目的:系统评价吗啡在急性冠脉综合征患者中的应用安全性。方法:对MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库从成立到2018年4月进行查询。比较ACS患者吗啡和非吗啡使用的研究被纳入。研究终点包括:院内心肌梗死(MI)、全因死亡率、中风、大出血、小出血和呼吸困难。结果:8项研究共纳入64 323例ACS患者,其中7项为观察性研究,1项为随机对照试验。吗啡的使用与院内复发性心肌梗死的风险增加相关(OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.18 ~ 1.43, p < 0.00001)。然而,在全因死亡率(OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.62 ~ 1.22, p = 0.44)、卒中(OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.39 ~ 1.66, p = 0.57)、大出血(OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24 ~ 1.00, p = 0.05)、轻微出血(OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.41 ~ 2.34, p = 0.97)、呼吸困难(OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.16 ~ 1.83, p = 0.33)方面,两组间无显著差异。结论:吗啡用于ACS疼痛控制与院内复发性心肌梗死的风险增加相关,需要随机临床试验来进一步研究吗啡在ACS中的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Asia
Heart Asia Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications. Statin adherence and persistence on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Taiwan. Anaesthesia use in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies Association of school hours with outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in schoolchildren Clinical consequences of poor adherence to lipid-lowering therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease: can we do better?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1