Prevalence of non-acute ischaemic cardiomyopathy in a Pakistani cohort.

Q2 Medicine Heart Asia Pub Date : 2019-03-25 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1136/heartasia-2018-011043
Muhammad Salman Ghazni, Saba Aijaz, Rehan Malik, Asad Z Pathan
{"title":"Prevalence of non-acute ischaemic cardiomyopathy in a Pakistani cohort.","authors":"Muhammad Salman Ghazni, Saba Aijaz, Rehan Malik, Asad Z Pathan","doi":"10.1136/heartasia-2018-011043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a frequently encountered clinical scenario. Coronary angiography (CAG) is usually performed to assess obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD) and the resultant ischaemia as causes of HFrEF.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the frequency of obstructive CAD (OCAD) in patients with HFrEF and its independent predictors and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective observational study in Tabba Heart Institute on patients who underwent CAG during the past 4 years. Patients with prior known CAD or revascularisation were excluded. OCAD was defined as per the criteria from Felker <i>et al</i>. Regression modelling was performed to evaluate the predictors of OCAD. Survival was compared between the groups using the log rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2235 patients who underwent CAG, 260 had HFrEF as a primary indication for CAG and, of these, 119 (45.8%) had OCAD. Major predictors of OCAD were age >50 years at presentation (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.7), presence of chest pain (OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.3 to 8.1), family history of premature CAD (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.9) and utilisation of non-invasive (NIV) stress testing before CAG (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.8 to 7.1). Survival was significantly lower (log rank p<0.001) in patients with OCAD with no revascularisation compared with OCAD with revascularisation or those who had non-obstructive CAD, and the latter two groups had comparable survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OCAD is detected in nearly half of the patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function undergoing CAG. Clinical judgement based on thorough history and use of NIV stress testing can help in appropriate patient selection for this test.</p>","PeriodicalId":12858,"journal":{"name":"Heart Asia","volume":"11 1","pages":"e011043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6454328/pdf/heartasia-2018-011043.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartasia-2018-011043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a frequently encountered clinical scenario. Coronary angiography (CAG) is usually performed to assess obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD) and the resultant ischaemia as causes of HFrEF.

Objectives: To determine the frequency of obstructive CAD (OCAD) in patients with HFrEF and its independent predictors and outcomes.

Methods: Retrospective observational study in Tabba Heart Institute on patients who underwent CAG during the past 4 years. Patients with prior known CAD or revascularisation were excluded. OCAD was defined as per the criteria from Felker et al. Regression modelling was performed to evaluate the predictors of OCAD. Survival was compared between the groups using the log rank test.

Results: Out of 2235 patients who underwent CAG, 260 had HFrEF as a primary indication for CAG and, of these, 119 (45.8%) had OCAD. Major predictors of OCAD were age >50 years at presentation (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.7), presence of chest pain (OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.3 to 8.1), family history of premature CAD (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.9) and utilisation of non-invasive (NIV) stress testing before CAG (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.8 to 7.1). Survival was significantly lower (log rank p<0.001) in patients with OCAD with no revascularisation compared with OCAD with revascularisation or those who had non-obstructive CAD, and the latter two groups had comparable survival.

Conclusions: OCAD is detected in nearly half of the patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function undergoing CAG. Clinical judgement based on thorough history and use of NIV stress testing can help in appropriate patient selection for this test.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦队列中的非急性缺血性心肌病患病率。
左心室射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)是临床上经常遇到的一种情况。冠状动脉造影术(CAG)通常用于评估阻塞性心外膜冠状动脉疾病(CAD)及其导致的缺血,这是导致 HFrEF 的原因:确定阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(OCAD)在 HFrEF 患者中的发生率及其独立预测因素和结果:方法:在塔巴心脏研究所对过去4年中接受CAG手术的患者进行回顾性观察研究。排除了既往有已知 CAD 或血管再通的患者。根据 Felker 等人的标准定义 OCAD。使用对数秩检验比较各组间的存活率:在 2235 名接受 CAG 的患者中,有 260 名以 HFrEF 作为 CAG 的主要适应症,其中 119 人(45.8%)有 OCAD。OCAD 的主要预测因素包括:发病时年龄大于 50 岁(OR 2.0,95% CI 1.1 至 3.7)、出现胸痛(OR 4.3,95% CI 2.3 至 8.1)、早发 CAD 家族史(OR 2.8,95% CI 1.3 至 5.9)以及在接受 CAG 前使用无创 (NIV) 压力测试(OR 3.6,95% CI 1.8 至 7.1)。存活率明显降低(对数秩p结论:在接受 CAG 检查的左心室收缩功能减退的患者中,近一半的患者可检测到 OCAD。根据详尽的病史和使用 NIV 压力测试进行临床判断有助于选择合适的患者进行该测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Asia
Heart Asia Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications. Statin adherence and persistence on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Taiwan. Anaesthesia use in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies Association of school hours with outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in schoolchildren Clinical consequences of poor adherence to lipid-lowering therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease: can we do better?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1