Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Urogynecology Journal Pub Date : 2019-09-01 Epub Date: 2019-04-30 DOI:10.1007/s00192-019-03952-7
Georgina Baines, Natalia Price, Helen Jefferis, Rufus Cartwright, Simon R Jackson
{"title":"Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.","authors":"Georgina Baines,&nbsp;Natalia Price,&nbsp;Helen Jefferis,&nbsp;Rufus Cartwright,&nbsp;Simon R Jackson","doi":"10.1007/s00192-019-03952-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Apical vaginal support for post-hysterectomy vault prolapse can be provided by vaginal, abdominal, or laparoscopic routes. Sacrocolpopexy is associated with higher satisfaction rates and a lower re-operation rate than vaginal sacrospinous fixation. The laparoscopic approach can reduce hospital stay and blood loss. There are concerns about the use of mesh in urogynaecological procedures, but limited data indicate a low mesh complication rate with sacrocolpopexy (0-5%). This study was aimed at establishing the incidence of complications following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at a large tertiary hospital. Cases were identified from coding data, theatre logs and the national urogynaecology procedure database. Data were gathered from theatre records, patient notes and the national database. Demographic data, concomitant procedures performed, duration of surgery, intra-operative complications, change in pelvic organ prolapse quantification point C, duration of stay, late complications and further urogynaecological surgery were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 660 patients underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy between 2005 and 2017 (median time from surgery 4 years 3 months). Five cases (0.7%) developed vaginal mesh exposure. Two were successfully managed conservatively with topical oestrogen. Three required surgical excision of the mesh. Four patients (0.6%) presented with erosion of non-absorbable vaginal sutures. Two were successfully managed conservatively with topical oestrogen and oral antibiotics. Two were managed with vaginal suture excision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This large series suggests that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy might confer a low risk of mesh exposure. Together with good anatomical and patient-reported outcomes, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a safe option for patients presenting with post-hysterectomy vault prolapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":"30 9","pages":"1475-1481"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-019-03952-7","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03952-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Apical vaginal support for post-hysterectomy vault prolapse can be provided by vaginal, abdominal, or laparoscopic routes. Sacrocolpopexy is associated with higher satisfaction rates and a lower re-operation rate than vaginal sacrospinous fixation. The laparoscopic approach can reduce hospital stay and blood loss. There are concerns about the use of mesh in urogynaecological procedures, but limited data indicate a low mesh complication rate with sacrocolpopexy (0-5%). This study was aimed at establishing the incidence of complications following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Methods: We carried out a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at a large tertiary hospital. Cases were identified from coding data, theatre logs and the national urogynaecology procedure database. Data were gathered from theatre records, patient notes and the national database. Demographic data, concomitant procedures performed, duration of surgery, intra-operative complications, change in pelvic organ prolapse quantification point C, duration of stay, late complications and further urogynaecological surgery were assessed.

Results: A total of 660 patients underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy between 2005 and 2017 (median time from surgery 4 years 3 months). Five cases (0.7%) developed vaginal mesh exposure. Two were successfully managed conservatively with topical oestrogen. Three required surgical excision of the mesh. Four patients (0.6%) presented with erosion of non-absorbable vaginal sutures. Two were successfully managed conservatively with topical oestrogen and oral antibiotics. Two were managed with vaginal suture excision.

Conclusions: This large series suggests that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy might confer a low risk of mesh exposure. Together with good anatomical and patient-reported outcomes, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a safe option for patients presenting with post-hysterectomy vault prolapse.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜骶骶固定术的网孔相关并发症。
引言和假设:子宫切除术后拱顶脱垂的根尖阴道支持可以通过阴道、腹部或腹腔镜途径提供。骶棘固定术与阴道骶棘固定术相比,具有更高的满意率和更低的再手术率。腹腔镜下入路可减少住院时间和出血量。人们对补片在泌尿妇科手术中的使用表示担忧,但有限的数据表明,骶髋固定术的补片并发症发生率较低(0-5%)。本研究旨在确定腹腔镜骶骶固定术后并发症的发生率。方法:我们对在一家大型三级医院行腹腔镜骶髋固定术的患者进行回顾性队列研究。从编码数据、手术室日志和国家泌尿妇科手术数据库中确定病例。数据收集自医院记录、病人笔记和国家数据库。评估人口统计资料、伴随手术、手术时间、术中并发症、盆腔器官脱垂量化点C的变化、住院时间、晚期并发症和进一步的泌尿妇科手术。结果:在2005年至2017年期间,共有660例患者接受了腹腔镜骶结肠固定术(中位手术时间为4年3个月)。5例(0.7%)出现阴道补片暴露。其中2例使用局部雌激素保守治疗成功。其中三人需要手术切除网状物。4例患者(0.6%)出现不可吸收阴道缝合线糜烂。2例成功保守治疗,外用雌激素和口服抗生素。2例采用阴道缝合切除术。结论:这一大型研究表明腹腔镜骶骶固定术可能具有较低的补片暴露风险。结合良好的解剖学和患者报告的结果,腹腔镜骶colpop固定术是子宫切除术后穹窿脱垂患者的安全选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Clinical Correlates of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Urogynecological Patients with Overactive Bladder. PANTHERA "Pelvic Floor Disorders in Patients Under ANtineoplastic THERApy" Prospective Evaluation of Subjectively Perceived Pelvic Floor Function in Patients with Gynecologic and Breast Cancers Undergoing Systemic Antineoplastic Therapy Using a Validated Pelvic Floor Questionnaire. Sexual Dysfunction Among Thai Women with Urinary Incontinence in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Alternatives to Synthetic Midurethral Slings in the Surgical Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Results of a National Survey. Incorporating Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy in the Treatment of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome and Posterior Compartment Pelvic Organ and Rectal Prolapse : Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the International Continence Society, the International Urogynecological Association, the American Urogynecologic Society, and the American Physical Therapy Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1