{"title":"Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with 10 or More Brain Metastases.","authors":"Masaaki Yamamoto, Yoshinori Higuchi, Yasunori Sato, Hidetoshi Aiyama, Hidetoshi Kasuya, Bierta E Barfod","doi":"10.1159/000493056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The JLGK0901 study showed the non-inferiority of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone as the initial treatment for 5-10 as compared to 2-4 brain metastases (BM) in terms of overall survival and most secondary endpoints [Lancet Oncol 2014;15:387-395]. A trend for patients with 5-10 tumors to undergo SRS alone has since become apparent. The next step is to reappraise whether results of SRS treatment alone for tumor numbers ≥10 differ from those for 2-9 tumors. During the past 2 decades, several retrospective studies have demonstrated the SRS alone treatment strategy to have certain benefits for carefully selected patients with ≥10 BM, i.e., a sufficiently long survival period with lower incidences of neurological death, neurological deterioration, local recurrence, and SRS-related complications. Herein, we introduce our Mito experiences with SRS for ≥10 BM, employing a case-matched study on 934 patients, 467 each in groups with 2-9 BM and ≥10 BM. Post-SRS treatment results, i.e., median survival time, neurological death-free survival time and cumulative incidences of local recurrence, repeat SRS for new lesions, neurological deterioration, and SRS-related complications, were not inferior for patients with ≥10 BM as compared to those with 2-9 BM. We conclude that patients with ≥10 tumors are not unfavorable candidates for SRS alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":39342,"journal":{"name":"Progress in neurological surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000493056","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in neurological surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000493056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Abstract
The JLGK0901 study showed the non-inferiority of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone as the initial treatment for 5-10 as compared to 2-4 brain metastases (BM) in terms of overall survival and most secondary endpoints [Lancet Oncol 2014;15:387-395]. A trend for patients with 5-10 tumors to undergo SRS alone has since become apparent. The next step is to reappraise whether results of SRS treatment alone for tumor numbers ≥10 differ from those for 2-9 tumors. During the past 2 decades, several retrospective studies have demonstrated the SRS alone treatment strategy to have certain benefits for carefully selected patients with ≥10 BM, i.e., a sufficiently long survival period with lower incidences of neurological death, neurological deterioration, local recurrence, and SRS-related complications. Herein, we introduce our Mito experiences with SRS for ≥10 BM, employing a case-matched study on 934 patients, 467 each in groups with 2-9 BM and ≥10 BM. Post-SRS treatment results, i.e., median survival time, neurological death-free survival time and cumulative incidences of local recurrence, repeat SRS for new lesions, neurological deterioration, and SRS-related complications, were not inferior for patients with ≥10 BM as compared to those with 2-9 BM. We conclude that patients with ≥10 tumors are not unfavorable candidates for SRS alone.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1966, this series has become universally recognized as the most significant group of books serving neurological surgeons. Volumes feature contributions from distinguished international surgeons, who brilliantly review the literature from the perspective of their own personal experience. The result is a series of works providing critical distillations of developments of central importance to the theory and practice of neurological surgery.